Scholarly productivity, impact, and quality among academic psychologists at group of eight universities

Australian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 204-215

  McNally, Gavan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Citation; Creativity; Impact; Productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149455445     PISSN: 00049530     EISSN: 17429536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00049531003667406     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allison, P. D., Long, J. S., & Krauze, T. K. (1982). Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review, 47, 615-625.
2. Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596-606.
3. Bazeley, P. (1998). Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applications: What counts in a highly competitive context? Higher Education, 35, 435-452.
4. Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64, 351-374.
5. Butler, L. (2002). A list of published papers is no measure of value. Nature, 419, 877.
6. Butler, L., & McAllister, I. (2009). Metrics or peer review? Evaluating the 2001 UK Research Assessment exercise in political science. Political Studies, 7, 3-17.
7. Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). Psychology is a hub science. Observer, 20, pp. 5, 42.
8. Clemente, F. (1973). Early career determinants of research productivity. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 409-419.
9. Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific performance. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 958-977.
10. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Cole, J. R., & Singer, B. (1991). A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle in science. In H. Zucker-man, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 277-310). New York: Norton.
12. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood, and researchperformanceinscience.ScientificAmerican,255,119-125.
13. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Sciento-metrics, 69, 131-152.
14. Faia, M. A. (1975). Productivity among scientists: A replication and elaboration. American Sociological Review, 40, 825-829.
15. Grant, L., & Ward, K. (1991). Gender and publishing in sociology. Gender and Society, 5, 207-223.
16. Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T, Beane, W. E., Lucker, G. W, & Matthews, K. A. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 896-908.
17. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 16569-16572.
18. Joy, S. (2006). What should I be doing, and where are they doing it? Scholarly productivity of academic psychologists. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 346-364.
19. Kelly, C. D., & Jennions, M. D. (2006). The h-index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 167-170.
20. Kyvik, S. (1990). Age and scientific productivity: Differences between fields of learning. Higher Education, 19, 37-55.
21. Lemoine, W. (1992). Productivity patterns of men and women scientists in Venezuela. Scientometrics, 24, 281-295.
22. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317-323.
23. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science considered. Science, 159,56-63.
24. Nakhaie, M. R. (2002). Gender differences in publication among University Professors in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology, 39,151-179.
25. Nicol, M. B., Henadeera, K., & Butler, L. (2007). NHMRC grant applications: A comparison of "track record " scores allocated by grant assessors with bibliometric analysis of publications. Medical Journal of Australia, 187, 348-352.
26. Oliver, J., Blair, C. A., Gorman, A., & Woehr, D. J. (2005). Research productivity of I-O psychology doctoral programs in North America. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 43, 55-63.
27. Prpic, K. (2002). Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics, 55, 27-58.
28. Rodgers, R. C., & Maranto, C. L. (1989). Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 636-649.
29. Segal, S. M., Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1980). The relationship of scientific creativity in the biological sciences to predoctoral accomplishments and experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 491-502.
30. Shabani, D. B., Carr, J. E., Petursdottir, A. I., Esch, B. E., & Gillet, J. N. (2004). Scholarly productivity in behavior analysis: The most prolific authors and institutions from 1992 to 2001. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 235-243.
31. Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66-89.
32. Snell, C., Sorensen, J., Rodriguez, J. J., & Kuanling, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity among criminal justice and criminology scholars. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 288-295.
33. Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children, and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45, 891-920.
34. Stewart, P. K., Roberts, M. C., & Roy, K. M. (2007). Scholarly productivity in clinical psychology PhD programs: A normative assessment of publication rates. Clinical Psychology, Science, & Practice, 14, 157-171.
35. Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201-222.
36. Toren, N., & Moore, D. (1998). The academic "hurdle race ": A case study. Higher Education, 35, 267-283.