Identification of novel Mlo family members in wheatand their genetic characterization

Genes and Genetic Systems

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 167-175

  Konishi, Shogo ^a,b   Sasakuma, Tetsuo ^a   Sasanuma, Tsuneo ^a,b  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b YAMAGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Gene family; Mlo; RT PCR; Stress response; Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERN; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MLO GENE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOSS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OSMOTIC STRESS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; PLANT ROOT; SALT STRESS; SHOOT; TAMLO 1 GENE; TAMLO 2 GENE; TAMLO 3 GENE; TAMLO 4 GENE; TAMLO 5 GENE; TAMLO 6 GENE; TAMLO 7 GENE; WHEAT;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MULTIGENE FAMILY; ORYZA SATIVA; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT ROOTS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TRITICUM;

ARABIDOPSIS; BRYOPHYTA; DICOTYLEDONEAE; FILICOPHYTA; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 78149449010     PISSN: 13417568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1266/ggs.85.167     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Büschges, R., Hollricher, K., Panstruga, R., Simons, G., Wolter, M., Frijters, A., van Daelen, R., van der Lee, T., Diergaarde, P., Groenendijk, J., et al. (1997) The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogens resistance. Cell 88, 695-705.
2. Chen, Z., Hartmann, A. H., Wu, M., Friedman, E. J., Chen, J., Pulley, M., Schulze-Lefert, P., and Panstruga, R. (2006) Expression analysis of the AtMLO gene family encoding plant-specific seven-transmembrane domain proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. 60, 583-597.
3. Devoto, A., Piffanelli, P., Nilsson, I., Wallin, E., Panstruga, R., von Heijne, G., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (1999) Topology, subcellular localization, and sequence diversity of the Mlo family in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34993-35004.
4. Devoto, A., Hartmann, A. H., Piffanelli, P., Elliott, C., Simmons, C., Taramino, G., Goh, C.-S., Cohen, E. F., Emerson, C. B., Schulze-Lefert, P., et al. (2003) Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the plant-specific seven-transmembrane MLO family. J. Mol. Evol. 56, 77-88.
5. Elliott, C., Zhou, F., Spielmeyer, W., Panstruga, R., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2002) Functional conservation of wheat and rice Mlo orthologs in defense modulation to the powdery mildew fungus. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 15, 1069-1077.
6. Huang, X., and Madan, A. (1999) CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 9, 868-877.
7. Jarosch, B., Jansen, M., and Schaffrath, U. (2003) Acquired resistance functions in mlo barley, which is hypersusceptible to Magnaporthe grisea. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 16, 107-114.
8. Jiang, Y., and Deyholos, M. K. (2006) Comprehensive transcriptional profiling of NaCl -stressed Arabidopsis roots reveals novel classes of responsive genes. BMC Plant Biol. 6, 25.
9. Jørgensen, J. H. (1992) Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 63, 141-152.
10. Kim, M. C., Panstruga, R., Elliott, C., Müller, J., Devoto, A., Yoon, H. W., Park, H., Cho, M. J., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2002) Calmodulin interacts with MLO to regulate defense against mildew in barley. Nature 416, 447-450.
11. Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R. F. (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132.
12. Liu, Q., and Zhu, H. (2008) Molecular evolution of the MLO gene family in Oryza sativa and their functional divergence. Gene 409, 1-10.
13. Nemoto, Y., and Sasakuma, T. (2002) Differential stress responses of early salt-stress responding genes in common wheat. Phytochemistry 61, 129-133.
14. Peterhänsel, C., Freialdenhoven, A., Kurth, J., Kolsch, R., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (1997) Interaction analyses of genes required for resistance responses to powdery mildew in barley reveal distinct pathways leading to leaf cell death. Plant Cell 9, 1397-1409.
15. Piffanelli, P., Zhou, F., Casais, C., Orme, J., Scharath, U., Collins, N., Panstruga, R., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2002) The barley MLO modulator of defence and cell death is responsive to biotic and abiotic stress stimuli. Plant Physiol. 129, 1076-1085.
16. Piffanelli, P., Ramsay, L., Waugh, R., Benabdelmouna, A., D'Hont, A., Hollricher, K., Jørgensen, J. H., Schulze-Lefert, P., and Panstruga, R. (2004) A barley cultivation-associated polymorphism conveys resistance to powdery mildew. Nature 430, 887-891.
17. Reinstädler, A., Müller, J., Czembor, J. H., Piffanelli, P., and Panstruga, R. (2010) Novel induced mlo mutant alleles in combination with site-directed mutagenesis reveal functionally important domains in the heptahelical barley Mlo protein. BMC Plant Biol. 10, 31.
18. Tacconi, G., Baldassarre, V., Collins, N. C., Bulgarelli, D., Stanca, A. M., and Vale, G. (2006) Haplotype characterization and markers at the barley Mlo powdery mildew resistance locus as tools for marker-assisted selection. Genome 49, 864-872.
19. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1596-1599.
20. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 4673-4680.
21. Tusnády, G. E., and Simon, I. (2001) The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics 17, 849-850.
22. Wolter, M., Hollricher, K., Salamini, F., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (1993) The mlo resistance alleles to powdery mildew infection in barley trigger a developmentally controlled defense mimic phenotype. Mol. Gen. Genet. 239, 122-128.
23. Zellerhoff, N., Himmelbach, A., Dong, W., Bieri, S., Schaffrath, U., and Schweizer, P. (2010) Nonhost resistance of barley to different fungal pathogens is associated with largely distinct, quantitative transcriptional responses. Plant Physiol. 152, 2053-2066.