Analysis of risk factors for surgical-site infections in 276 oral cancer surgeries with microvascular free-flap reconstructions at a single university hospital

Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 334-339

  Karakida, Kazunari ^a   Aoki, Takayuki ^b   Ota, Yoshihide ^b   Yamazaki, Hiroshi ^b   Otsuru, Mitsunobu ^b   Takahashi, Miho ^b   Sakamoto, Haruo ^a   Miyasaka, Muneo ^b  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY HACHIOJI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b TOKAI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Microvascular free flap reconstructions; Oral cancer; Risk factor; Surgical site infection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL INFECTION; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREE TISSUE GRAFT; HUMAN; INFECTION RISK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOUTH CANCER; NECK DISSECTION; OPERATION DURATION; ORAL SURGERY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SMOKING HABIT; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURGICAL INFECTION; TONGUE CARCINOMA; TRACHEOSTOMY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

EID: 78149415862     PISSN: 1341321X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10156-010-0108-y     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. AJ Mangram TC Horan ML Pearson LC Silver WR Jarvis 1999 Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20 250 278 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jsFarsw%3D%3D 10.1086/501620 10219875
2. SP Lilani N Jangale A Chowdhary GB Daver 2005 Surgical site infection in clean and clean-contaminated cases Indian J Med Microbiol 23 249 252 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnksFSjsA%3D%3D 16327121
3. R Chattopadhyay S Zaroukian E Potvin 2006 Surgical site infection rates at the Pontiac Health Care Centre, a rural community hospital Can J Rural Med 11 41 48 16454971
4. M Uchino H Ikeuchi T Tsuchida K Nakajima N Tomita Y Takesue 2009 Surgical site infection following surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in patients with clean-contaminated wounds World J Surg 33 1042 1048 10.1007/s00268-009- 9934-4 19198930
5. N Penel C Fournier D Lefebvre JL Lefebvre 2005 Multivariate analysis of risk factors for wound infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma surgery with opening of mucosa. Study of 260 surgical procedures Oral Oncol 41 294 303 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.08.011 15743692 (Pubitemid 40311758)
6. CJ Lotfi C Cavalcanti Rde AM Costa e Silva R Latorre Mdo C Ribeiro Kde AL Carvalho, et al. 2008 Risk factors for surgical-site infections in head and neck cancer surgery Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138 74 80 10.1016/j.otohns.2007. 09.018 18164997 (Pubitemid 350299639)
7. N Penel Y Mallet M Roussel-Delvallez JL Lefebvre Y Yazdanpanah 2008 Factors determining length of the postoperative hospital stay after major head and neck cancer surgery Oral Oncol 44 555 562 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.07.003 17936062 (Pubitemid 351672238)
8. SA Liu YK Wong CK Poon CC Wang CP Wang KC Tung 2007 Risk factors for wound infection after surgery in primary oral cavity cancer patients Laryngoscope 117 166 171 10.1097/01.mlg.0000249737.05840.29 17202947 (Pubitemid 46066080)
9. H Ogihara K Takeuchi Y Majima 2009 Risk factors of postoperative infection in head and neck surgery Auris Nasus Larynx 36 457 460 10.1016/j.anl.2008.10.005 19111412
10. RS Weber I Raad R Frankenthaler P Hankins RM Byers O Guillamondegui, et al. 1992 Ampicillin-sulbactam vs clindamycin in head and neck oncologic surgery. The need for gram-negative coverage Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118 1159 1163 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FktVSntg%3D%3D 1418893
11. JT Johnson K Kachman RL Wagner EN Myers 1997 Comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam versus clindamycin in the prevention of infection in patients undergoing head and neck surgery Head Neck 19 367 371 1:STN:280:DyaK2szoslaitA%3D%3D 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199708)19:5<367::AID- HED1>3.0.CO;2-Y 9243262
12. MD Batstone D Lowe RJ Shaw JS Brown ED Vaughan SN Rogers 2009 Passive versus active drainage following neck dissection: a non-randomised prospective study Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266 121 124 10.1007/s00405-008-0723-8 18548264