Data-driven stochastic subspace identification of flutter derivatives of bridge decks

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Volumn 98, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 784-799

  Boonyapinyo, Virote ^a   Janesupasaeree, Tharach ^b  

^a THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Toyo Thai Corporation Public Company Limited   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Bridge decks; Data driven stochastic subspace identification; Flutter derivatives; Turbulent flow; Wind tunnel test

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE DECKS; BUFFETING; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); NUMERICAL METHODS; RELIGIOUS BUILDINGS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TESTING; TURBULENT FLOW; WIND STRESS;

BUFFETING FORCE; DATA YIELDS; DETERMINISTIC SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL METHODS; FLUTTER DERIVATIVES; STOCHASTIC METHODS; STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION; WIND TUNNEL TESTS;

WIND TUNNELS;

EID: 78149415049     PISSN: 01676105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2010.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brownjohn J.M.W., Jakobsen J.B. New estimation method of aerodynamic admittance function. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2001, 89:1113-1136.
2. Boonyapinyo V., Yamada H., Miyata T. Wind-induced nonlinear lateral-torsional buckling of cable-stayed bridges. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 1994, 120(2):486-506.
3. Boonyapinyo V., Miyata T., Yamada H. Advanced aerodynamic analysis of suspension bridges by state-space approach. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 1999, 125(12):1357-1366.
4. Boonyapinyo V., Lauhatanon Y., Lukkunaprasit P. Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis of suspension bridges. Eng. Struct. 2006, 28(5):793-803.
5. Chen Z.Q., Yu X.D. A new method for measuring flutter self-excited forces of long-span bridges. China Civ. Eng. J. 2002, 35:34-41.
6. Chowdhury A.G., Sarkar P.P. A new technique for identification of eighteen flutter derivatives using a three-degree-of-freedom section model. Eng. Struct. 2003, 25:1763-1772.
7. Dyrbye C., Hansen S.O. Wind Loads on Structures 1996, John Wiley, New Jersey.
8. Falco M., Curami A., Zasso A. Nonlinear effects in sectional model aeroelastic parameter identification. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1992, 42:1321-1332.
9. Golub G.H., Van Loan C.F. Matrix Computations 1996, John Hopkins University Press, MD, USA. 3rd ed.
10. Gu M., Zhang R.X., Xiang H. Identification of flutter derivatives of bridge decks. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2000, 84:151-162.
11. Gu M., Qin X.R. Direct identification of flutter derivatives and aerodynamic admittances of bridge decks. Eng. Struct. 2004, 26:2161-2172.
12. Haan, F.L., 2000. The effects of turbulence on the aerodynamics of long-span bridges. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
13. Hatanaka A., Tanaka H. New estimation method of aerodynamic admittance function. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2002, 90:2073-2086.
14. Hjorth-Hansen E. Section model test Aerodynamics of Large Bridges 1992, Balkema, PE, pp. 819-827.
15. Jakobsen J.B., Hjorth-Hansen E. Determination of the aerodynamic derivatives by a system identification method. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1995, 57:295-305.
16. Jakobsen J.B., Hjorth-Hansen E. Aeroelastic effects on a rectangular box-girder bridge. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1998, 74-76:819-827.
17. Juang J.N., Pappa R.S. An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 1985, 8:620-627.
18. Larose, G.L., 1997. The dynamic action of gusty winds on long span bridges. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark.
19. Mishra S.S., Kumar K., Krishna P. Identification of 18 flutter derivatives by covariance driven stochastic subspace method. Wind Struct. 2006, 9(2):159-178.
20. Overschee, P.V., 1991. Subspace algorithms for the stochastic identification problem. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Decision and Control, Brighton, England, pp. 1321-1326.
21. Overschee P.V., Moor D.B. Subspace Identification for Linear System: Theory-Implementation-Applications 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
22. Peeters B. Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for out-put only modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 1999, 13(6):855-878.
23. Poulsen N.K., Damsgaard A., Reinhold T.A. Determination of flutter derivatives for the Great Belt Bridge. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1992, 57:295-305.
24. Peeters B., De Roeck Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 2001, 123:659-666.
25. Sarkar P.P., Jones N., Scanlan R.H. Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 1994, 120(8):1718-1741.
26. Sarkar P.P., Caracoglia L., Haan F.L., Sato H., Murakoshi J. Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections, part 1: analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data. Eng. Struct. 2009, 31:158-169.
27. Scanlan R.H., Tomko J.J. Airfoil and bridges deck flutter derivatives. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 1971, 97(6):1717-1733.
28. Scanlan R.H. Motion of suspended bridge spans under gusty wind. J. Struct. Div. ASCE 1977, 103(9):1867-1883.
29. Scanlan R.H., Lin W.H. Effects of turbulence on bridge flutter derivatives. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 1978, 104(4):719-733.
30. Simiu E., Scanlan R.H. Wind Effects on Structures 1996, John Wiley, NJ. 3rd ed.
31. Strømmen E. Theory of Bridge Aerodynamics 2006, Springer, New York. 1st ed.
32. Yamada H., Miyata T, Ichikawa H. Measurement of aerodynamic coefficients by system identification methods. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1992, 42:1255-1263.