Does using lower limit of normal values enhance the ability of a single bone mineral density measure to predict fractures?

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1881-1888

  Wu, Q ^c   Magnus, J H ^a,b   Rice, J C ^a   Lefante, J J ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Bone density; Classification; Diagnosis; LLN; Osteoporosis; T score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CAUCASIAN; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FRACTURE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENOPAUSE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; AGING; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149414489     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1160-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. D Marshall O Johnell H Wedel 1996 Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures BMJ 312 1254 1259 1:STN:280:DyaK283isFejtw%3D%3D 8634613
2. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis Technique report series No. 843. WHO, Geneva
3. SR Cummings D Bates DM Black 2002 Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review JAMA 288 1889 1897 10.1001/jama.288.15.1889 12377088 (Pubitemid 35168145)
4. Lewiecki ME (2003) Mike's Manual 6th New Mexico Clinical Research & osteoporosis Center, Inc. Albuquerque, NM, USA
5. SL Greenspan L Maitland-Ramsey E Myers 1996 Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on site-specific analysis Calcif Tissue Int 58 409 414 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjsVKmt78%3D 10.1007/BF02509439 8661481
6. KG Faulkner E von Stetten P Miller 1999 Discordance in patient classification using T-scores J Clin Densitom 2 343 350 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c%2FhvVCrtg%3D%3D 10.1385/JCD:2:3:343 10548828
7. KG Faulkner 1998 Bone densitometry: choosing the proper skeletal site to measure J Clin Densitom 1 279 285 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvgtFeksg%3D%3D 10.1385/JCD:1:3:279 15304900
8. NA Pocock PN Sambrook T Nguyen P Kelly J Freund JA Eisman 1992 Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments J Bone Miner Res 7 1081 1084 1:STN:280: DyaK3s%2FjsVCntQ%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650070911 1414500
9. KG Faulkner LA Roberts MR McClung 1996 Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA systems Osteoporos Int 6 432 436 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7otlWktQ%3D%3D 10.1007/BF01629574 9116387 (Pubitemid 27007695)
10. O Lofman L Larsson G Toss 2000 Bone Bone mineral density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: reference population, definition of peak bone mass, and measured site determine prevalence J Clin Densitom 3 177 186 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvjsFantQ%3D%3D 10.1385/JCD:3:2:177 10871911
11. EM Lewiecki DL Kendler GM Kiebzak P Schmeer RL Prince G El-Hajj Fuleihan D Hans 2004 Special report on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Osteoporos Int 15 779 784 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2cvlvFGnug%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-004-1677-3 15278247 (Pubitemid 39361947)
12. American Statistical Association JSM online program Available at: http://www.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2007/onlineprogram/index.cfm?fuseaction= abstract-details&abstractid=309589. Accessed January 15, 2009
13. National Center for Health Statistics (1994) Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 Vital Health Stat 1 (32) DHHS publication no (PHS) 94-1308 NCHS, Hyattsville, Maryland
14. Kung HC, Hoyert DL, Xu JQ, Murphy SL. (2008) Deaths: final data for 2005. National vital statistics reports; 56 (10) Hyattsville MD: national Center for Health Statistics
15. SR Cummings MC Nevitt WS Browner K Stone KM Fox KE Ensrud J Cauley D Black TM Vogt 1995 Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group N Engl J Med 332 767 773 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ms1aktw%3D%3D 10.1056/NEJM199503233321202 7862179
16. P Steiger SR Cummings DM Black NE Spencer HK Genant 1992 Age-related decrements in bone mineral density in women over 65 J Bone Miner Res 7 625 632 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FjsVChtg%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650070606 1414480
17. AC Looker HW Wahner WL Dunn MS Calvo TB Harris SP Heyse CC Johnston Jr R Lindsay 1998 Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults Osteoporos Int 8 468 489 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmslensA%3D%3D 10.1007/s001980050093 9850356 (Pubitemid 28486716)
18. KG Faulkner E von Stetten P Steiger P Miller 1998 Discrepancies in osteoporosis prevalence at different skeletal sites: impact on the WHO criteria Bone 12 S198
19. S Grampp HK Genant A Mathur P Lang M Jergas M Takada CC Glüer Y Lu M Chavez 1997 Comparisons of non-invasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification J Bone Miner Res 12 697 711 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ovFCgsg%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.5.697 9144335
20. JW Davis PD Ross RD Wasnich 1994 Evidence for both generalized and regional low bone mass among elderly women J Bone Miner Res 9 305 309 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3kvFCguw%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650090303 8191922
21. H Genant Y Lu A Mathur T Fuerst S Cummings 1996 Classification based on DXA measurements for assessing the risk of hip fractures J Bone Miner Res 11 S120
22. H Genant Y Lu A Mathur T Fuerst S Zhao S Cummings 1997 Diverse diagnostic armamentarium in bone mass measures: opportunities and dilemmas Osteoporos Int 7 258
23. RB Mazess HS Barden 1999 T-scores differ among skeletal sites Calcif Tissue Int 64 S104
24. J Hanson 1997 Standardization of femur BMD J Bone Miner Res 12 1316 1317 1:STN:280:DyaK2svgtleqtw%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.8.1316 9258764 Letter
25. O Lofman L Larsson G Toss 2001 Bone mineral density instead of T-score? J Clin Densitom 4 75 77 10.1016/S1094-6950(06)60152-2
26. ES Leib N Binkley JP Bilezikian DL Kendler EM Lewiecki SM Petak 2006 Position Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Vancouver, BC July 15-17, 2005 J Rheumatol 33 11 2319 2321 17086613 (Pubitemid 44749795)
27. D Hans R Downs JF Duboeuf S Greenspan L Jankowski G Kiebzak S Petak 2005 Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: The 2005 ISCD official positions J Clin Densitom 9 15 21 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.003
28. N Binkley J Bilezikian D Kendler E Leib E Lewiecki S Petak 2005 Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry and executive summary of the 2005 position development conference J Clin Densitom 9 4 14 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.002 (Pubitemid 43775507)
29. Y Lu HK Genant J Shepherd S Zhao A Mathur TP Fuerst SR Cummings 2001 Classification of osteoporosis based on bone mineral densities J Bone Miner Res 16 901 910 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FgvFaksA%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.901 11341335
30. Anonymous 1993 Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis Am J Med 94 646 650 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90218-E (Pubitemid 23166713)
31. SL Hui CW Slemenda CC Johnston 1988 Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study J Clin Invest 81 1804 1809 1:STN:280: DyaL1c3lslCntQ%3D%3D 10.1172/JCI113523 3384952
32. J Kanis F Borgstrom C De Laet, et al. 2005 Assessment of fracture risk Osteoporosis Int 16 581 589 10.1007/s00198-004-1780-5 (Pubitemid 40897454)