Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 2600-2616

  Schad, Daniel J ^a   Nuthmann, Antje ^b   Engbert, Ralf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Foveal load hypothesis; Linear mixed effect model; Parafoveal on foveal effects; Perceptual span; Reading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; READING; RELIABILITY; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; READING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 78149413426     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Altarriba J., Kroll J.F., Sholl A., Rayner K. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition 1996, 24(4):477-492.
2. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R 2008, Cambridge University Press.
3. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59(4):390-412.
4. Baddeley A.D., Thomson N., Buchanan M. Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1975, 14(6):575-589.
5. Balota D.A., Cortese M.J., Sergent-Marshall S.D., Spieler D.H., Yap M.P. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:283-316.
6. Balota D.A., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1985, 17(3):364-390.
7. Bates, D., & Sakar, D. (2008). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes, Version 0.999375-15.
8. Calvo M.G., Meseguer E. Eye movements and processing stages in reading: Relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2002, 5(1):66-77.
9. Cousineau D. Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2005, 1(1):42-45.
10. de Zubicaray G.I., McMahon K.L., Eastburn M.M., Finnigan S., Humphreys M.S. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects in recognition memory. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 24(3):587-598.
11. Diana R.A., Reder L.M. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32(4):805-815.
12. Drieghe D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61(8):1239-1249.
13. Ehrlich S.E., Rayner K. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20:641-655.
14. Engbert, R. (2007). Reading with a dynamic processing span. Paper presented at the 14th European conference on eye movements, ECEM 14, University of Potsdam.
15. Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (in press). Parallel graded attention models of reading. In: S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Engbert R., Kliegl R. Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research 2003, 43(9):1035-1045.
17. Engbert R., Longtin A., Kliegl R. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research 2002, 42(5):621-636.
18. Engbert R., Mergenthaler K. Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(18):7192-7197.
19. Engbert R., Nuthmann A. Self-consistent estimation of mislocated fixations during reading. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(e1534):1-6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001534.
20. Engbert R., Nuthmann A., Richter E.M., Kliegl R. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review 2005, 112(4):777-813.
21. Geyken A. The DWDS-corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20th century. Collocations and idioms: Linguistic, lexicographic, and computational aspects 2006, Continuum Press, London. C. Fellbaum (Ed.).
22. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading - Implications for attention and eye-movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16(3):417-429.
23. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Eye-movement control during reading - Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology - Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale 1993, 47(2):201-221.
24. Hyönä J., Olson R.K. Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21(6):1430-1440.
25. Inhoff A.W., Eiter B.M., Radach R. Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(5):979-995.
26. Inhoff A.W., Pollatsek A., Posner M.I., Rayner K. Covert attention and eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology 1989, 41(1):63-89.
27. Inhoff A.W., Rayner K. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading - Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 1986, 40(6):431-439.
28. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A theory of reading - From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 1980, 87(4):329-354.
29. Kennedy A. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects are not an artifact of mislocated saccades. Journal of Eye Movement Research 2008, 2(1):2. 1-10.
30. Kennedy A., Pynte J. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research 2005, 45(2):153-168.
31. Kennison S.M., Clifton C. Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21(1):68-81.
32. Kliegl R. Toward a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136(3):530-537.
33. Kliegl R., Masson M.E.J., Richter E.M. A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition 2010, 18(5):655-681.
34. Kliegl R., Grabner E., Rolfs M., Engbert R. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16(1-2):262-284.
35. Kliegl R., Nuthmann A., Engbert R. Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135(1):12-35.
36. Kliegl R., Risse S., Laubrock J. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1250-1255.
37. Liversedge S.P., Findlay J.M. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(1):6-14.
38. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 109:163-203.
39. Mason R.A., Just M.A. How the brain processes causal inferences in text - A theoretical account of generation and integration component processes utilizing both cerebral hemispheres. Psychological Science 2004, 15(1):1-7.
40. McConkie G.W., Rayner K. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1975, 17(6):578-586.
41. Miozzo M., Caramazza A. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132(2):228-252.
42. Monsell S. The nature and locus of the word frequency effect in reading. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition 1991, 148-197. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. D. Besner, G. Humphreys (Eds.).
43. Morrison R.E. Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:667-682.
44. Morton J. The effects of context upon speed of reading, eye movements and eye-voice span. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1964, 16(4):340-354.
45. Murray W.S., Forster K.I. Serial mechanisms in lexical access: The rank hypothesis. Psychological Review 2004, 111(3):721-756.
46. Myers J.L., Shinjo M., Duffy S.A. Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26(4):453-465.
47. Naveh-Benjamin M., Craik F.I.M., Guez J., Dori H. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 1998, 24(5):1091-1104.
48. Naveh-Benjamin M., Guez J. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: Assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26(6):1461-1482.
49. Norris D. The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review 2006, 113(2):327-357.
50. Nuthmann A., Engbert R. Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Research 2009, 49(3):322-336.
51. Nuthmann A., Engbert R., Kliegl R. Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research 2005, 45(17):2201-2217.
52. Nuthmann A., Engbert R., Kliegl R. The IOVP effect in mindless reading: Experiment and modeling. Vision Research 2007, 47(7):990-1002.
53. Nuthmann A., Kliegl R. An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(5):31. 1-28, doi:10.1167/9.5.31.
54. Pinheiro J., Bates D. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS 2000, Springer, New York.
55. Pollatsek A., Rayner K., Balota D.A. Inferences about eye- movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception and Psychophysics 1986, 40(2):123-130.
56. Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D., Juhasz B.J., Machacek D., Rayner K. Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: A reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34(3):726-750.
57. Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D., Rayner K. Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: A response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2006, 32(6):1485-1489.
58. Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D., Rayner K. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 52(1):1-56.
59. R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Version 2.6.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
60. Radach R., Heller D. Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. Reading as a perceptual process 2000, 165-191. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, J. Pynte (Eds.).
61. Raney G.E., Rayner K. Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology - Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale 1995, 49(2):151-173.
62. Rao K.V., Proctor R.W. Study-phase processing and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984, 10(3):386-394.
63. Rayner K. Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes. Memory & Cognition 1977, 5(4):443-448.
64. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124(3):372-422.
65. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62(8):1457-1506.
66. Rayner K., Ashby J., Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(4):720-732.
67. Rayner K., Duffy S.A. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14(3):191-201.
68. Rayner K., Fischer M.H. Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58(5):734-747.
69. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading 1987, 327-362. Erlbaum, London. M. Coltheart (Ed.).
70. Rayner K., Pollatsek A., Drieghe D., Slattery T.J., Reichle E.D. Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136(3):520-529.
71. Rayner K., Raney G.E. Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review 1996, 3:238-244.
72. Rayner K., Sereno S.C., Raney G.E. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:1188-1200.
73. Rayner K., White S.J., Kambe G., Miller B., Liversedge S.P. On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research 2003, 213-234. Elsevier, Amsterdam. J. Hyönä, R. Radach, H. Deubel (Eds.).
74. Reder L.M., Nhouyvanisvong A., Schunn C.D., Ayers M.S., Angstadt P., Hiraki K. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26(2):294-320.
75. Reichle E.D., Liversedge S.P., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13(3):115-119.
76. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105(1):125-157.
77. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research 2006, 7(1):4-22.
78. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2003, 26(4):445-526.
79. Reichle E.D., Warren T., McConnell K. Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16(1):1-21.
80. Reilly R., O'Regan J.K. Eye movement control in reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Research 1998, 38:303-317.
81. Reilly R.G., Radach R. Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research 2006, 7(1):34-55.
82. Reingold E.M., Rayner K. Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Psychological Science 2006, 17(9):742-746.
83. Schroyens W., Vitu F., Brysbaert M., d'Ydewalle G. Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology 1999, 52(4):1021-1046.
84. Starr M.S., Rayner K. Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5(4):156-163.
85. Vitu F., Brysbaert M., Lancelin D. A test of parafoveal-on-foveal effects with pairs of orthographically related words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16(1-2):154-177.
86. Vitu F., Lancelin D., d'Unienville V.M. A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1220-1249.
87. Vitu F., McConkie G.W., Kerr P., O'Regan J.K. Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research 2001, 41(25-26):3513-3533.
88. Vitu F., O'Regan J.K., Inhoff A.W., Topolski R. Mindless reading - Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57(3):352-364.
89. Whaley C.P. Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1978, 17(2):143-154.
90. White S.J., Rayner K., Liversedge S.P. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12(5):891-896.
91. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis 2009, Springer, New York.