Comparison of measured acoustic power results gained by using three different methods on an ultrasonic low-frequency device

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 567-576

  Petošić, Antonio ^a   Svilar, Dragoljub ^b   Ivančević, Bojan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^b Brodarski Institut doo   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Derived acoustic power; Dissipated power; Electroacoustic efficiency factor; Electromechanical characterization; Input electrical impedance; Ultrasonic device with sonotrode

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; CALORIMETRY; CAVITATION; CHARACTERIZATION; ELASTIC WAVES; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES; EQUIVALENT CIRCUITS; RESONANT CIRCUITS; TANKS (CONTAINERS); ULTRASONIC DEVICES;

ACOUSTIC POWER; DISSIPATED POWER; ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE; ELECTROACOUSTIC EFFICIENCY; ELECTROMECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATIONS; SONOTRODES;

ELECTRIC NETWORK PARAMETERS;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ARTICLE; CALORIMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PIEZOELECTRICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 78149406438     PISSN: 13504177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Boni L., Benevento A., Cantore F., Dionigi G., Rovera F., Dionigi R. Technological advances in minimally invasive surgery. Expert Review of Medical Devices 2006, 3(2):147-153.
2. International Standard IEC 61847, Ultrasonics - Surgical Systems, Measurement and Declaration of the Basic Output Characteristics, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
3. International Standard CEI, IEC 61088, Characterization and Measurements of Ultrasonic Piezoceramic Transducers, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, 1991.
4. Koda S., Kimura T., Kondo T., Mitome H. A standard method to calibrate sonochemical efficiency of an individual reaction system. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2003, 10:149-156.
5. Contamine R.F., Wilhelm A.M., Berlan J., Delmas H. Acoustic powers. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 1995, 2(1):S43-S47.
6. Kuijpers M.W.A., Kemmere M.F., Keurentjes J.T.F. Calorimetric study of the energy efficiency for ultrasonic-induced radical formation. Ultrasonics 2002, 40:675-678.
7. Löning J.M., Horst C., Hoffmann U. Investigations on the energy conversion in sonochemical processes. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2002, 9:169-179.
8. Kinsler L.E., Frey A.F., Coppens A.B., Sanders J.V. Fundamentals of Acoustics 2000, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
9. A. Petošić, Evaluating Parameters of an Ultrasonic Surgical Device in the Linear and Nonlinear Operating Mode, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Department of Electroacoustics, University of Zagreb, 2008 (in Croatish language).
10. Waterhouse R.V. Radiation impedance of a source near reflectors. JASA 1963, 35(8):1144-1151.
11. Leighton T.J. Acoustic Bubble 1994, Academic Press, San Diego.
12. Laborde J.L., Hita A., Caltagirone J.P., Gerard A. Fluid dynamics phenomena induced by power ultrasonics. Ultrasonics 2000, 38:297-300.
13. Parlitz U., Mettin R., Luther S., Akhatov I., Voss M., Lauterborn W. Spatio-temporal dynamics of acoustic cavitation bubble clouds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A - Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 1999, 357(1751):313-334.
14. Neppiras E.A. Acoustic cavitation series. 1. Acoustic cavitation - an introduction. Ultrasonics 1984, 22(1):25-28.
15. Gaitan D.F., Crum L.A., Church C.C., Roy R.A. Sonoluminescence and bubble dynamics for a single, stable, cavitation bubble. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1992, 91(6):3166-3183.
16. Wu C.Q., Nakagawa N., Fujihara M. Study on acoustic cavitations in the ultrasonic radiation field. JSME International Journal Series C - Mechanical Systems Machine Elements and Manufacturing 2006, 49(3):758-763.
17. Ilyichev V.I., Koretz V.L., Melnikov N.P. Spectral characteristics of acoustic cavitation. Ultrasonics 1989, 27(6):357-361.
18. Fry W.J., Dunn F. Some aspects of the present status of ultrasonic in fundamental biological research and in medicine. A Report on the International Conference of Ultrasonics in Medicine, Los-Angeles, California, September 6-7, 1957. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1957, 29(12):1374-1375.
19. Nyborg W.L. Mechanisms for nonthermal effects of sound. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1968, 44(5):1302-1309.
20. Deng C.X., Sieling F., Pan H., Cui J.M. Ultrasonic-induced cell membrane porosity. Ultrasonic in Medicine and Biology 2004, 30(4):519-526.
21. Mortimer B., Du Bruyn T., Davies J., Tapson J. High power resonant tracking amplifier using admittance locking. Ultrasonics 2001, 39:257-261.
22. Hansen H.H. Optimal design of an ultrasonic transducer. Structural Optimization 1997, 14:150-157.
23. Gausmann R., Seemann W. A model for a piezoelectric transformer. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 2001, 81:S189-S190.
24. Chubachi N., Kamata H. Various equivalent circuits for thickness mode piezoelectric transducers. Electronics and Communications in Japan. Part II - Electronics 1996, 79(6):50-59.
25. Lin S.Y. Load characteristics of high power sandwich piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers. Ultrasonics 2005, 43(5):365-373.
26. Castillo M., Acevedo P., Moreno E. KLM model for lossy piezoelectric transducers. Ultrasonics 2003, 41(8):671-679.
27. S. Sheritt, B. Dolgin, Y.B. Cohen, Modeling of horns for sonic/ultrasonic applications, in: IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, 1999.
28. M. Schafer, A. Broadwin, Acoustical characterization of ultrasonic surgical device, in: IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, IEEE Inc., New York, 1994, pp. 1903-1906.
29. Zieniuk J.K., Evans B. The influence of thermal parameters on making ultrasonic power measurements by a calorimetric method. Acustica 1971, 25.
30. A. Štimac, V. Komeštik, T. Štimac, An approach to calibration of ultrasonic surgery equipment, in: Eighth International IMEKO TC-13 Conference on Measurement in Clinical Medicine, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 1998.
31. Margulis I.M., Marguilis M.A. Measurement of acoustic power in studying cavitation processes. Acoustical Physics 2005, 51(6):695-704.
32. Margulis M.A., Margulis I.M. Calorimetric method for measurement of acoustic power absorbed in a volume of a liquid. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2003, 10(6):343-345.
33. Blackstock D.T. Fundamentals of Physical Acoustics 2000, John Wiley and Sons.
34. Pierce A.D. Acoustics: An Introduction to its Physical Principles and Applications 1994, American Institute of Physics.
35. Cheeke J.D.N. Fundamentals and Application of Ultrasonic Waves 2004, CRC Press.
36. Petošić A., Ivančević B., Svilar D. Measuring derived acoustic power of an ultrasonic surgical device in the linear and nonlinear operating mode. Ultrasonics 2009, 49(6):522-531.
37. Makin I.R., Everbach E.C. Measurement of pressure and assessment of cavitation for a 22.5kHz intra arterial angioplastic device. JASA 1996, 100(3):1855-1864.
38. Campos-Pozuelo C., Granger C., Vanhille C., Moussatov A., Dubus B. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the mean acoustic pressure in the cavitation field. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2005, 12(1-2):79-84.
39. Camplain E., Despaux G., Ferrandis J.Y., Attal J. Wide-range viscoelastic measurement using resonating sensors. Ultrasonics 2004, 42:569-572.
40. Aurelle N., Guyomar D., Richard C., Gonnard P., Eyraud L. Nonlinear behaviour of an ultrasonic transducer. Ultrasonics 1996, 34:187-191.
41. N.N. Abboud, G.L. Wojcik, K. Vaughan, J. Mould, D.J. Powell, L. Nikodym, Finite element modeling for ultrasonic transducer, in: Proc. SPIE Int. Symp. Medical Imaging, Ultrasonic Transducer Engineering Conference, San Diego, February, 1998.
42. Sáez V., Frias-Ferrer A., Iniesta J., Gonzáles-García J., Aldaz A., Riera E. Characterization of a 20 kHz sonoreactor. Part I. Analysis of mechanical effects by classical numerical methods. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2005, 12:59-65.
43. Klíma J., Frias-Ferrer A., Gonzales-Garcia J., Ludvik J., Sáez V., Iniesta J. Optimisation of 20kHz sonoreactor geometry on the basis of numerical simulation of local ultrasonic intensity and qualitative comparison with experimental results. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2007, 14:19-28.
44. Louisnard O., Gonzales-Garcia J., Tudela I., Klima J., Saez V., Vargas-Hernandez Y. FEM simulations of a sono-reactor accounting for vibrations of the boundaries. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2008, 16:250-259.
45. Yasui K., Kozuka T., Tuziuti T., Towata A., Lida Y., Kong J., Macey P. FEM calculation of an acoustic field in a sonochemical reactor. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2007, 14:605-614.