Using multiple scales to estimate the projected frontal surface area of complex three-dimensional shapes such as flexible freshwater macrophytes at different flow conditions

Limnology and Oceanography: Methods

Volumn 8, Issue SEPT, 2010, Pages 474-483

  Sagnes, Pierre ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149402845     PISSN: 15415856     EISSN: 15415856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2010.8.474     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alexander, D. E. 1990. Drag coefficients of swimming animals: effects of using different reference areas. Biol. Bull. 179:186-190 [doi:10.2307/1541768].
2. Asaeda, T., T. Fujino, and J. Manatunge. 2005. Morphological adaptations of emergent plants to water flow: a case study with Typha angustifolia, Zizania latifolia, and Phragmites australis. Freshw. Biol. 50:1991-2001 [doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01445.x].
3. Barrat-Segretain, M. -H., A. Elger, P. Sagnes, and S. Puijalon. 2002. Comparison of three life-history traits of invasive Elodea canadensis Michx. and Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H. St. John. Aquat. Bot. 74:299-313 [doi:10.1016/S0304-3770(02)00106-7].
4. Boller, M. L., and E. Carrington. 2006. The hydrodynamic effects of shape and size change during reconfiguration of a flexible macroalga. J. Exp. Biol. 209:1894-1903 [doi:10.1242/jeb.02225].
5. Boller, M. L., and E. Carrington. 2007. Interspecific comparison of hydrodynamic performance and structural properties among intertidal macroalgae. J. Exp. Biol. 210:1874-1884 [doi:10.1242/jeb.02775].
6. Blake, R. W. 2006. Biomechanics of rheotaxis in six teleost genera. Can. J. Zool. 84:1173-1186 [doi:10.1139/Z06-105].
7. Callaghan, F. M., and others. 2007. A submersible device for measuring drag forces on aquatic plants and other organisms. New Zeal. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 41:119-127 [doi:10.1080/00288330709509900].
8. Cooper, G. G., F. M. Callaghan, V. Nikora, N. Lamouroux, B. Statzner, and P. Sagnes. 2007. Effects of flume characteristics on the assessment of drag on flexible macrophytes and a rigid cylinder. New Zeal. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 41:129-135 [doi:10.1080/00288330709509901].
9. García-March, J. R., L. Pérez-Rojas, and A. M. García-Carrascosa. 2007. Influence of hydrodynamic forces on population structure of Pinna nobilis L., 1758 (Mollusca: Bivalvia): The critical combination of drag force, water depth, shell size and orientation. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 342:202-212 [doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2006.09.007].
10. Gaylord, B., C. A. Blanchette, and M. W. Denny. 1994. Mechanical consequences of size in wave-swept algae. Ecol. Monog. 64:287-313 [doi:10.2307/2937164].
11. Green, J. C. 2005. Further comments on drag and reconfiguration of macrophytes. Freshw. Biol. 50:2162-2166 [doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01470.x].
12. Haring, R. N., and R. C. Carpenter. 2007. Habitat-induced morphological variation influences photosynthesis and drag on the marine macroalga Pachydictyon coriaceum. Mar. Biol. 151:243-255 [doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0474-2].
13. Hoerner, S. F. 1965. Résistance à l'avancement dans les fluides. Gauthier-Villars.
14. Kane, B., and E. T. Smiley. 2006. Drag coefficients and crown area estimation of red maple. Can. J. Forest Res. 36:1951-1958 [doi:10.1139/X06-086].
15. Lightbody, A. F., and H. M. Nepf. 2006. Prediction of velocity profiles and longitudinal dispersion in emergent salt marsh vegetation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51:218-228 [doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1.0218].
16. Niklas, K. J., and H. C. Spatz. 2000. Wind-induced stresses in cherry trees: evidence against the hypothesis of constant stress levels. Trees Struct. Funct. 14:230-237.
17. O'Hare, M., K. A. Hutchinson, and R. T. Clarke. 2007. The drag and reconfiguration experienced by five macrophytes from a lowland river. Aquat. Bot. 86:253-259 [doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.11.004].
18. Puijalon, S., G. Bornette, and P. Sagnes. 2005. Adaptations to increasing hydraulic stress: morphology, hydrodynamics and fitness of two higher aquatic plant species. J. Exp. Bot. 56:777-786 [doi:10.1093/jxb/eri063].
19. Ricklefs, R. E., and D. M. Miles. 1994. Ecological and evolutionary inferences from morphology: An ecological perspective, p. 13-41. In P. C. Wainwright and S. M. Reilly [eds.], Ecological morphology: Integrative organismal biology. University of Chicago Press.
20. Rudnicki, M., S. J. Mitchell, and M. D. Novak. 2004. Wind tunnel measurements of crown streamlining and drag relationships for three conifer species. Can. J. Forest Res. 34:666-676 [doi:10.1139/x03-233].
21. Sagnes, P., J.-Y. Champagne, and R. Morel. 2000. Shifts in drag and swimming potential during grayling ontogenesis: relations with habitat use. J. Fish Biol. 57:52-68 [doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00775.x].
22. Sagnes, P., and B. Statzner. 2009. Hydrodynamic abilities of riverine fish: a functional link between morphology and velocity use. Aquat. Living Resour. 22:79-91 [doi:10.1051/alr/2009008].
23. Sand-Jensen, K. 2003. Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes. Freshw. Biol. 48:271-283 [doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.00998.x].
24. Sand-Jensen, K.. 2005. Aquatic plants are open flexible structures-a reply to Sukhodolov. Freshw. Biol. 50:196-198 [doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01297.x].
25. Schutten, J., and A. J. Davy. 2000. Predicting the hydraulic forces on submerged macrophytes from current velocity, biomass and morphology. Oecologia 123:445-452 [doi:10.1007/s004420000348].
26. Statzner, B., N. Lamouroux, V. Nikora, and P. Sagnes. 2006. The debate about drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes: comparing results obtained by three recently discussed approaches. Freshw. Biol. 51:2173-2183 [doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01636.x].
27. Sukhodolov, A. 2005. Comment on drag and reconfiguration of macrophytes. Freshw. Biol. 50:194-195 [doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01296.x].
28. Suren, A. M., G. M. Smart, R. A. Smith, and S. L. R. Brown. 2000. Drag coefficients of stream bryophytes: experimental determinations and ecological significance. Freshwater Biol. 45:309-317 [doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2000.00621.x].
29. Taïar, R., P. Sagnes, C. Henry, A. B. Dufour, and A. H. Rouard. 1999. Hydrodynamics optimization in butterfly swimming: position, drag coefficient and performance. J. Biomech. 32:803-810 [doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00066-4].
30. Vogel, S. 1994. Life in moving fluids. The physical biology of flow, 2nd ed. Princeton Univ. Press.
31. Vollsinger, S., S. J. Mitchell, K. E. Byrne, M. D. Novak, and M. Rudnicki. 2005. Wind tunnel measurements of crown streamlining and drag relationships for several hardwood species. Can. J. Forest Res. 35:1238-1249 [doi:10.1139/x05-051].
32. Wainwright, P. C. 1996. Ecological explanation through functional morphology: the feeding biology of sunfishes. Ecology 77:1336-1343 [doi:10.2307/2265531].
33. Waringer, J. A. 1993. The drag coefficient of cased caddis larvae from running waters: experimental determination and ecological applications. Freshw. Biol. 29:419-427 [doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00776.x].