Impact on General Principles of Treaty Interpretation

The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Christoffersen, Jonas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

European convention on human rights; Human rights law; Human rights treaties; International law; Treaty interpretation

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149396913     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565221.003.0003     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. K. Vasak, 'Towards a Specific International Human Rights Law' in K. Vasak and P. Alston (eds.), The International Dimension of Human Rights (Unesco, Paris 1982) 671-672.
2. W. Friedmann, The Changing Structure of International Law (London, Stevens & Sons 1964), 40-44, 62 and 240-244;
3. J. Crawford, 'The ILC's Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect' (2002) 96 AJIL 874, 887
4. Friedmann, The Changing Structure of International Law (1964), 63.
5. A. Orakhelashvili, 'Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights' (2003) 14 EJIL 529, 533;
6. M. K. Addo and N. Grief, 'Is There a Policy Behind the Decisions and Judgments Relating to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights?' (1995) 20 ELR 178, 183
7. G. L. Weil, The European Convention on Human Rights: Background, Development and Prospects (A. W. Sijthoff, Leiden 1963) 198. An example is Article 227 para. 1 EC (Article 170 EC Treaty).
8. See e.g. P. van Dijk, Judicial Review of Governmental Action and the Requirement of an Interest to Sue: A Comparative Study of the Requirement of an Interest to Sue in National and International Law (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, The Hague 1980);
9. M. Ragazzi, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1997) 210-214;
10. N. Jørgensen, The Responsibility of States for International Crimes (Clarendon Press, Oxford 2000) 220.
11. See e.g. C. Tomuschat, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003) 159-170.
12. No link is drawn by e.g. van Dijk, Judicial Review of Governmental Action and the Requirement of an Interest to Su: A Comparative Study of the Requirement of an Interest to Sue in National and International Law (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, The Hague 1980) 335-336;
13. M. Kamminga, Inter-State Accountability for Violations of Human Rights (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia 1992) 156-163.
14. Council of Europe, Collected Edition of the Travaux Préparatoires, vol. 3 (1961) 770.
15. P.-H. Teitgen in Council of Europe, Collected Edition of the Travaux Préparatoires, vol. 1 (1961) 131.
16. M. Sørensen, 'Do the Rights set Forth in the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950 Have the Same Significance in 1975?' Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquy about the European Convention on Human Rights-organised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Italy and the Secretariat General of the Council of Europe (Rome 5-8 November 1975) (Council of Europe, Strasbourg 1975) 106.
17. H. Waldock, 'The Effectiveness of the System set up by the European Convention on Human Rights' (1980) 1 HRLJ 1, 4-5;
18. ILC (1966) Annual Report, 222.
19. C. McLachlan, 'The Principle of Systematic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention' (2005) 54 ICLQ 279, 306-309.
20. McLachlan (2005) 54 ICLQ 279, 309-319.
21. ILC (1966) Annual Report, 222, para. 15.
22. See e.g. R. Toma, La réalité judiciaire de la Cour européenne des droits de l'Homme: Activisme et retenue judiciaires (Nomos, Baden-Baden 2003)
23. See e.g. E. McWhinney, Judicial Settlement of International Disputes: Jurisdiction, Justiciability and Judicial Law-Making on the Contemporary International Court (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1991).
24. Vasak, Towards a Specific International Human Rights Law (1982) 672.
25. L.D. Eriksson, 'The Indeterminacy of Law or Law as a Deliberate Practice' in A. Hirvonen (ed.), Polycentricity: The Multiple Scenes of Law (Pluto Press, London/Sterling/Virginia 1998) 46.
26. H. Lauterpacht, The Function of Law in the International Community (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1933) 256.
27. W. Sadurski, Moral Pluralism and Legal Neutrality (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London 1990) 44-47.
28. A.W. Green, Political Integration by Jurisprudence: The Work of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in European Political Integration (A.W. Sijthoff, Leiden 1969).
29. H. Rasmussen, On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster 1986).
30. H. Kutscher, Methods of Interpretation as seen by a Judge at the Court of Justice (Court of Justice of the European Communities, Luxembourg 1976) 6.
31. A. Bredimas, Methods on Interpretation and Community Law (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam/New York/Oxford 1978);
32. C. Gulmann., 'Methods of Interpretation of the European Court of Justice' (1980) 24 Scandinavian Studies of Law 187, 190;
33. L.N. Brown and T. Kennedy, The Court of Justice of the European Communities, 4th ed. (Sweet and Maxwell, London 1994) 294-322.
34. O. Spiermann, 'The Other Side of the Story: An Unpopular Essay on the Making of the European Community Legal Order' (1999) 10 EJIL 763;
35. D. Wyatt, 'New Legal Order, or Old?' (1982) 7 ELR 147.
36. J. Weiler, 'Rewriting Van Gend & Loos: Towards a Normative Theory of ECJ Hermeneutics' in O. Wiklund (ed.), Judicial Discretion in European Perspective (Nordstedts Juridik/Kluwer Law International, Stockholm 2003).
37. For the Inter-American Court, see D.R. Pinzón, The 'Victim' Requirement, the Fourth Instance Formual and the Notion of 'Person' in the Individual Complaint Procedure of the Inter-American Human Rights System (2001) 7 ILSA J Intl Comp L 1.
38. B. Cheng, General Principles of Law as applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Stevens & Sons Limited, London 1953) 117.
39. Y. Shany, 'Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?' (2006) 16 EJIL 907, 913.
40. D. Feldman, 'Establishing the Legitimacy of Judicial Procedures for Protecting Human Rights' (2001) 13 European Review of Public Law 139.
41. P. Mahoney, 'Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two sides of the Same Coin' (1990) 11 HRLJ 57, 81.
42. J.A. Sweeney, 'Margins of Appreciation: Cultural Relativity and the European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era' (2005) 54 ICLQ 459, 466.
43. L. Wildhaber, 'A Constitutional Future for the European Court of Human Rights' (2002) 23 HRLJ 161.
44. Shany, (2006) 16 EJIL 907.
45. R. Higgins, 'The ICJ, the ECJ, and the Integrity of International Law' (2003) 52 ICLQ 1, 10-12 and 19.