An online database of ACT-R parameters: Towards a transparent community-based approach to model development

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, ICCM 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 282-286

  Wong, Tsunhin John ^a   Cokely, Edward T ^a,b   Schooler, Lael J ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ACT R; Modeling; Parameter

Indexed keywords

ACT-R; COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES; DATABASE SUPPORT; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MODELING STUDIES; NUMERICAL PARAMETERS; ONLINE DATABASE; PARAMETER;

DATABASE SYSTEMS; MODELS; QUERY PROCESSING;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 78149380285     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, Memory, and thought. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? Oxford University Press, USA.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Lebiere, C., & Matessa, M. (1998). An integrated theory of list memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 341-380.
5. Gigerenzer, G. (1998). We need statistical thinking, not statistical rituals. Behavorial and Brain Sciences, 21, 199-200.
6. Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. J. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107-143.
7. Gunzelmann, G., Gross, J. B., Gluck, K. A., & Dinges, D. F. (2009). Sleep Deprivation and Sustained Attention Performance: Integrating Mathematical and Cognitive Modeling. Cognitive Science, 33(5), 880-910.
8. Mata, R., Schooler, L., & Rieskamp, J. (2007). The aging decision maker: cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 796-810.
9. Oaksford, M. (2002). How does it fit? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 412-413.
10. Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J., & Zhang, S. (2002). Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109(3), 472-491.
11. Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review, 107(2), 358-367.
12. Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Reply to Rodgers and Rowe (2002). Psychological Review, 109(3), 605-607.
13. Schooler, L. J., & Hertwig, R. (2005). How Forgetting Aids Heuristic Inference. Psychological Review, 112(3), 610- 628.
14. Taatgen, N. A., Van Rijn, H., & Anderson, J. (2007). An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: The role of cognition, attention, and learning. Psychological Review, 114(3), 577-598.
15. Wexler, K. (1978). A review of John R. Anderson's Language, Memory, and Thought. Cognition, 6, 327- 351.