To compress or not to compress - Compute vs. IO tradeoffs for mapreduce energy efficiency

Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Green Networking, Green Networking '10, Co-located with SIGCOMM 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 23-28

  Chen, Yanpei ^a   Ganapathi, Archana ^a   Katz, Randy H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

compression; Hadoop; MapReduce

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149342464     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1851290.1851296     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Hadoop Power-By Page. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/PoweredBy.
2. Sun Fire X2200 M2 Server power calculator. http://www.sun.com/servers/ x64/x2200/calc/.
3. A. Ganapathi et al. Statistics-driven workload modeling for the Cloud. In SMDB '10: International Workshop on Self Managing Database Systems.
4. L. A. Barroso and U. Hölzle. The case for energy proportional computing. Computer, 40(12):33-37, 2007.
5. Y. Chen, L. Keys, and R. Katz. Towards energy efficient MapReduce. Technical Report UCB/EECS-2009-109, UC Berkeley, 2009.
6. J. Leverich and C. Kozyrakis. On the Energy (In)efficiency of Hadoop Clusters. In HotPower '09: Workshop on Power Aware Computing and Systems.
7. O. O'Malley and A. C. Murthy. Winning a 60 second dash with a yellow elephant. Yahoo! Developer Network Blog. May 11, 2009, http://developer.yahoo. com/ blogs/hadoop/Yahoo 2009.pdf.
8. S. Rivoire et al. Joulesort: a balanced energy-efficiency benchmark. In SIGMOD '07: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Management of data.