Influence of specimen geometry on split Hopkinson tensile bar tests on sheet materials

Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

Volumn 65, Issue , 2008, Pages 587-598

  Verleysen, P ^a   Degrieck, J ^a   Verstraete, T ^a   Van Slycken, J ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Deformation; High strain rate; Specimen geometry; Split Hopkinson bar test; Stress strain curve

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149341727     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Itabashi M, Kawata K (2000) Carbon content effect on high-strain-rate tensile properties for carbon steels. Int J Impact Eng 24:117-131. DOI 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00050-0
2. Kawata K, Hashimoto S, Takeda N, Sekino S (1985) On high-velocity brittleness and ductility of dual-phase steel and some hybrid fiber reinforced plastics. In: Vinson JR, Taya M (eds) Recent advances in composites in the United States and Japan (ASTM STP 864). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, p 700
3. Field J, Walley S, Proud W, Goldrein H, Siviour C (2004) Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies. Int J Impact Eng 30:725-775. DOI 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.03.005
4. Verleysen P, Degrieck J (2000) Improved signal processing for split Hopkinson bar tests on (quasi-)brittle materials. Exp Tech 246:31-33. DOI 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2000.tb01346.x
5. Staab GH, Gilat A (1991) A direct-tension split Hopkinson bar for high strain-rate testing. Exp Mech 31:232-235. DOI 10.1007/BF02326065
6. Uenishi A, Teodosiu C (2004) Constitutive modelling of the high strain rate behaviour of interstitial-free steel. Int J Plast 20:915-936. DOI 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.06.004
7. Kolsky H (1949) An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc B 62:676-700. DOI 10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302
8. Davies E, Hunter S (1963) The dynamic compression testing of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Mech Phys Solids 11:155-179. DOI 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-4
9. Clark DS, Wood DS (1957) The influence of specimen dimension and shape on the results in tension impact testing. Am Soc Mech Eng Counc Rep Membersh 38:577-585
10. Rusinek A, Cheriguene R, Baumer A, Klepaczko IR, Larour P (2008) Dynamic behaviour of high-strength sheet steel in dynamic tension: experimental and numerical analyses. J Strain Anal Eng Des 43:37-53
11. Huh H, Kang WJ, Han SS (2002) A tension split Hopkinson bar for investigating the dynamic behavior of sheet metals. Exp Mech 42:8-17. DOI 10.1007/BF02411046
12. Verleysen P, Degrieck J (2004) Optical measurement of the specimen deformation at high strain rate. Exp Mech 44:247-252. DOI 10.1007/BF02427890
13. Verleysen P, Degrieck J (2004) A modified digital phase-shift moiré technique for impact deformation measurements. Opt Lasers Eng 426:653-671. DOI 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2004.05.001
14. Verleysen P, Degrieck J (2003) Measurement of the evolution of the axial strain distribution in Hopkinson specimens. J Phys IV 110:501-506
15. Van Slycken J, Verleysen P, Degrieck J, Samek L, De Cooman BC (2006) High-strain-rate behavior of low-alloy multiphase aluminum- and silicon-based transformation-induced plasticity steels. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 37A5:1527-1539
16. Gilat A, Goldberg RK, Roberts GD (2003) High strain rate response of epoxy in tensile and shear loading. J Phys IV 110:123-127
17. Yoshida F, Uemori T, Fujiwara K (2002) Elastic-plastic behavior of steel sheets under in-plane cyclic tension-compression at large strain. Int J Plast 185-6:633-659
18. Chong H, Haeng K (2001) Evaluation of mechanical properties under a temperature gradient field. Meas Sci Technol 12:1881-1885
19. Eskandari H, Nemes J (2000) Dynamic testing of composite laminates with a tensile split Hopkinson bar. J Compos Mater 344:260-273
20. Wang C, Xia Y (2000) Validity of one-dimensional experimental principle for flat specimen in bar-bar tensile impact apparatus. Int J Solids Struct 37:3305-3322
21. Nicholas T (1981) Tensile testing of materials at high rates of strain. Exp Mech 21:177-185
22. Yuanxin Z, Yuanming X (2000) Experimental study of the rate-sensitivity of SiCp/Al composites and the establishment of a dynamic constitutive equation. Compos Sci Technol 60:403-410
23. Dey S, Hopperstad O, Borvik T, Clausen A (2002) Constitutive relation and failure criterion for three structural steels at high strain rates. In: Jones N, Brebbia C, Rajendran A (eds) Structures under shock and impact VII. WIT, Southampton, pp 427-436
24. Hu XY, Daehn GS (1996) Effect of velocity on flow localization in tension. Acta Mater 44:1021-1033. DOI 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00228-6
25. Rusinek A, Zaera R, Klepaczko JR, Cheriguene R (2005) Analysis of inertia and scale effects on dynamic neck formation during tension of sheet steel. Acta Mater 53:5387-5400