Linearity and reliability of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus dynamic constant external resistance relationships for the biceps brachii

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1487-1498

  Stock, M S ^a   Beck, T W ^a   DeFreitas, J M ^a   Dillon, M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; MMG; Strength training

Indexed keywords

MUSCLE; RELIABILITY;

BICEPS BRACHII; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EXTERNAL RESISTANCE; INTRA CLASS; MECHANOMYOGRAPHIC; MECHANOMYOGRAPHIC AMPLITUDES; MUSCLE ACTION; STRENGTH TRAININGS; UNILATERAL DYNAMICS;

ACCELEROMETERS;

EID: 78149332451     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/11/006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Basmajian J V and De Luca C J 1985 Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography 5th edn (Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins)
2. Beck T W, DeFreitas J M, Stock M S and Dillon M A 2009 The linearity and reliability of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus submaximal isometric force relationship Physiol. Meas. 30 1009-16
3. Beck T W, Housh T J, Cramer J T, Weir J P, Johnson G O, Coburn J W, Malek M H and Mielke M 2005 Mechanomyographic amplitude and frequency responses during dynamic muscle actions: a comprehensive review Biomed. Eng. Online 4
4. Beck T W, Housh T J, Johnson G O, Weir J P, Cramer J T, Coburn J W and Malek M 2004a Mechanomyographic and electromyographic time and frequency domain responses during submaximal to maximal isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 92 352-9 (Pubitemid 39117499)
5. Beck T W, Housh T J, Johnson G O, Weir J P, Cramer J T, Coburn J W and Malek M 2004b Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus torque relationships during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 14 555-64 (Pubitemid 39061147)
6. Beck T W, Housh T J, Johnson G O, Weir J P, Cramer J T, Coburn J W and Malek M H 2006 Comparison of a piezoelectric contact sensor and an accelerometer for examining mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus torque relationships during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 16 324-35
7. Coburn J W, Housh T J, Cramer J T, Weir J P, Miller J M, Beck T W and Johnson G O 2004 Mechanomyographic responses of the vastus medialis to isometric and eccentric muscle actions Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36 1916-22
8. Coburn J W, Housh T J, Cramer J T, Weir J P, Miller J M, Beck T W, Malek M and Johnson G O 2005 Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses of the vastus medialis muscle during isometric and concentric muscle actions J. Strength Cond. Res. 19 412-20
9. Dalton P A and Stokes M J 1991 Acoustic myography reflects force changes during dynamic concentric and eccentric contractions of the human biceps brachii muscle Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 63 412-6
10. deVries H A 1968 'Efficiency of electrical activity' as a physiological measure of the functional state of muscle tissue Am. J. Phys. Med. 47 10-22
11. Fisher A and Merhautova J 1961 Electromyographic manifestations of individual stages of adapted sports technique Health and Fitness in the Modern World (Chicago, IL: The Athletic Institute) chapter 13
12. Gordon G and Holbourn A H S 1948 The sounds from single motor units in a contracting muscle J. Physiol. 107 456-64
13. Herda T J, Ryan E D, Beck T W, Costa P B, DeFreitas J M, Stout J R and Cramer J T 2008 Reliability of mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during isometric step and ramp muscle actions J. Neurosci. Methods. 171 104-9
14. Kraemer W J and Fry A C 1995 Strength Testing: Development and Evaluation of Methodology (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics)
15. Marusiak J, Jaskolska A, Kisiel-Sajewicz K, Yue G H and Jaskolski A 2009 EMG and MMG activities of agonist and antagonist muscles in Parkinson's disease patients during absolute submaximal load holding J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 19 903-14
16. Moritani T and deVries H A 1978 Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction Am. J. Phys. Med. 57 263-77
17. Moritani T and deVries H A 1979 Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain Am. J. Phys. Med. 58 115-30
18. Orizio C 1993 Muscle sound: bases for the introduction of a mechanomyographic signal in muscle studies Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 21 201-43
19. Orizio C, Gobbo M, Diemont B, Esposito F and Veicsteinas A 2003 The surface mechanomyogram as a tool to describe the influence of fatigue on biceps brachii motor unit activation strategy. Historical basis and novel evidence Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 90 326-36
20. Orizio C, Perini R and Veicsteinas A 1989 Muscular sound and force relationship during isometric contraction in man Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 58 528-33 (Pubitemid 19089966)
21. Pedhazur E J 1997 Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction 3rd edn (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers)
22. Petitjean M, Maton B and Cnockaert J C 1992 Evaluation of human dynamic contraction by phonomyography J. Appl. Physiol. 73 2567-73
23. Sarlabous L, Torres A, Fiz J A, Gea J, Martinez-Llorens J M and Jané R 2009 Evaluation of the respiratory muscular function by means of diaphragmatic mechanomyographic signals in COPD patients 31st Annu. Conf. IEEE-EMBS, 2009
24. Stock M S, Beck T W, DeFreitas J M and Dillon M A 2010a Linearity and reliability of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships for the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles Muscle Nerve 41 342-9
25. Stock M S, Beck T W, DeFreitas J M and Dillon M A 2010b Linearity and reliability of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus concentric dynamic constant external resistance relationships for the bench press exercise J. Strength. Cond. Res. 24 785-95
26. Tian S L, Liu Y, Li L, Fu W J and Peng C H 2010 Mechanomyography is more sensitive than EMG in detecting age-related sarcopenia J. Biomech. 43 551-6
27. Torres A, Fiz J A, Galdiz B, Gea J and Jané R 2004 Non invasive assessment of respiratory muscle effort by means of the study of diaphragm movement registered with surface sensors. Animal model (dogs) 26th Annu. Conf. IEEE-EMBS, 2004
28. Torres A, Fiz J A, Gladiz J B, Gea J, Morera J and Jané R 2006 Inspiratory pressure evaluation by means of the entropy of respiratory mechanomyographic signals 28th Annu. Conf. IEEE-EMBS, 2006
29. Watakabe M, Mita K, Akataki K and Itoh Y 2001 Mechanical behaviour of condenser microphone in mechanomyography Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 39 195-201
30. Weir J P 2005 Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM J. Strength Cond. Res. 19 231-40