The impact of number of sites in a follow the sun setting on the actual and perceived working speed and accuracy: A controlled experiment

Proceedings - 5th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICGSE 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 165-174

  Van Solingen, Rini ^a   Valkema, Menno ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE; WORKING SPEED;

SPEED;

EID: 78149331021     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICGSE.2010.27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Flexible and distributed software processes: old petunias in new bowls? Commun. ACM, 49(10).
2. R-project. http://www.r-project.org/.
3. R. D. Battin, R. Crocker, J. Kreidler, and K. Subramanian. Leveraging resources in global software development. IEEE Softw., 18(2):70-77, 2001.
4. F. P. Brooks. Grasping reality through illusion - interactive graphics serving science. In CHI '88: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1-11, New York, NY, USA, 1988. ACM.
5. F. P. Brooks. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, 20th Anniversary Edition. Addison-Wesley Professional, August 1995.
6. E. Carmel. Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones. Prentice Hall, December 1998.
7. E. Carmel and R. Agarwal. Tactical approaches for alleviating distance in global software development. Software, IEEE, 18(2):22-29, 2001.
8. E. Carmel, Y. Dubinsky, and A. Espinosa. Follow the sun software development: New perspectives, conceptual foundation, and exploratory field study. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 0:1-9, 2009.
9. E. Carmel and P. Tjia. Offshoring Information Technology: Sourcing and Outsourcing to a Global Workforce. Cambridge University Press, June 2005.
10. E. O. Conchuir, H. Holmstrom, P. J. Agerfalk, and B. Fitzgerald. Exploring the assumed benefits of global software development. IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pages 159-168, 2006.
11. J. A. Espinosa and E. Carmel. The impact of time separation on coordination in global software teams: a conceptual foundation. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 8(4):249-266, 2003.
12. J. A. Espinosa and E. Carmel. The effect of time separation on coordination costs in global software teams: A dyad model. In Proceedings of the 37th HICSS Conference. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
13. J. A. Espinosa, N. Nan, and E. Carmel. Do gradations of time zone separation make a difference in performance? a first laboratory study. IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pages 12-20, 2007.
14. G. Lee, W. DeLone, and J. A. Espinosa. Ambidextrous coping strategies in globally distributed software development projects. Commun. ACM, 49(10):35-40, 2006.
15. S. McConnell. The 10 most powerful ideas in software engineering. Keynote Presentation at the International Conference on Software Engineering, 2009. http://keynote-discussion-steve-mcconnell-icse09.googlegroups.com/web/ 10MostPowerfulIdeas-ICSE.pdf.
16. R. Prikladnicki. Quase - a quantitative approach to analyze the human aspects of software development projects. In CHASE '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects on Software Engineering, page 78. IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
17. J. J. Treinen and S. L. Miller-Frost. Following the sun: case studies in global software development. IBM Syst. J., 45(4):773-783, 2006.
18. C. Visser and R. van Solingen. Selecting locations for follow-the-sun software development: Towards a routing model. IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pages 185-194, 2009.
19. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and A.Wesslén. Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA, 2000.