An approach for textual authoring of hypermedia documents based on the use of programmatic visualization and hypertextual navigation;Uma abordagem para autoria textual de documentos hipermídia baseada no uso de visualização programática e navegação hipertextual

WebMedia 2009 - 15th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Azevedo, Roberto Gerson De Albuquerque ^a,b   Lima, Bruno Seabra ^a   Neto, Carlos De Salles Soares ^a,b   Teixeira, Mário Meireles ^b  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MARANHÃO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Design; Documentation; I.7.2 Document Preparation : Format and notation, hypertext hypermedia, Markup Languages, Standards; Languages

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149316225     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1858477.1858495     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Guimarães, R. L., Costa, R. M. R., and Soares, L. F. G. 2007. Composer: Ambiente de Autoria de Aplicações Declarativas para TV Digital. XIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Multimídia e Web - WebMedia2007. Gramado, Brasil - Outubro de 2007.
2. Adobe Flash CS4 Professional. Disponível em http://www.adobe.com/ products/flash/
3. LimSee2 - SMIL Editor. Disponível em http://limsee2.gforge.inria. fr
4. Adobe Dreamweaver CS4 Professional. Disponível em http://www.adobe.com/br/products/dreamweaver/
5. Bulterman, D. C. A., Hardman, L., and Mullender, K. S., e Rutledge, L. (1998) "Grins: A graphical interface for creating and playing smil documents". WWW7 Conference Computer Networks and a ISDN Systems.
6. Stenning, K., and Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal (1995, Volume 19).
7. de Souza, C. S. 2005 The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction (Acting with Technology). The MIT Press.
8. Petre, M. 1995. Why Looking Isn't Always Seeing: Readership Skills and Graphical Programming. Communication of the ACM - Junho 1995 Volume38.
9. Stenning, K, Cox, R., and Oberlander, J. (1995). Contrasting the cognitive effects of graphical and sentential logic teaching: Reasoning, representation and individual differences. Language and Cognitive Processes. (1995, Volume 10).
10. Neary, D., and Woodhard, M. 2002. An Experiment to Compare the Comprehensibility of Textual and Visual Forms of Algebraic Specifications. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing (2002, Volume 13).
11. Hundhausen, C. D., and Lee Brown, J. 2007. An experimental study of the impact of visual semantic feedback on novice programming. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing (2008, Volume 18).
12. Kluit, P., Sint, M., and Wester, F. 1998. Visual programming with Java: evaluation of an introductory programming course. In Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on the teaching of computing. (Dublin, Irlanda,1998).
13. Erwig, M., and Meyer, B. A. 1995. Heterogeneous visual languages-integrating visual and textualprogramming. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Visual Languages. (Darmstadt, Alemanha, 1995).
14. Haibt, L. M. 1959. A Program to Draw Multi-Level Flow Charts. In Proceedings of The Western Joint Computer Conference (San Francisco, Estados Unidos, 1959).
15. Knuth, D. E. 1963. Computer-Drawn Flowcharts. In Communications of the ACM. (Volume 6, 1963)
16. Myers, B. A. 1986. Visual programming, programming by example, and program visualization: a taxonomy. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 1986).
17. Price, A. B., Small, I. S, and Baecker, R. M. 1993. A Principled Taxonomy of Software Visualization. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing.
18. Petre, M., and Price, A. B. 1992. Why Computer Interfaces Are Not Like Paintings: the user as a deliberate reader. In Proceedings, East-West HCI'92. (St. Petersburg, Rússia, 1992).
19. Navarro-Prieto, R., and Cañas, J. 2001. Are visual programming languages better? The role of imagery in program comprehension. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.
20. Green, T. R, G., and Petre, M. 1992. When Visual Programs are Harder to Read than Textual Programs. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. Budaspeste, Hungria, 1992.
21. Whitley, K. N. 1996. Visual Programming Languages and the Empirical Evidence For and Against. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing.
22. Shigeru Chiba. 1998. Javassist - A Reflection-based Programming Wizard for Java. In Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications - OOPSLA'98. (Vancouver, Canada, 2000).
23. Eclipse.org (2008). "Eclipse IDE". Disponível em: http://www.eclipse.org
24. LuaEclipse (2008). "Luaeclipse: An integrated development environment for the lua programming language". Disponível em: http://luaeclipse.luaforge.net/
25. Eclipse C/C++ Development Tooling - CDT (2008). Disponível em: http://www.eclipse.org/cdt/
26. Pennington, N. 1987. Stimulus structures and mental representation in expert comprehension of computer programs. Techinical Report on Cognitive Psychology.
27. Bouwhuis, D. G. 1988. Reading as goal-driven behaviour. In B. A. G. Elsendoorn and H. Bouma, Eds., Working Models of Human Perception.
28. W3C. 2000. XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition) - W3C Recommendation. Janeiro 2000. Disponível em http://www.w3.org/TR/html/.
29. W3C. 2008. Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) 3.0 - W3C Recommendation. Dezembro 2008. Disponível em http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/ REC-SMIL3-20081201/
30. ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (2007) "Televisão Digital Terrestre- Codificação de dados e especificações de transmissão para radiodifusão digital. Parte 2: Ginga-NCL para receptores fixos e móveis - Linguagem de aplicação XML para codificação aplicaç ão".
31. Antonacci, M. J., Muchaluat-Saade, D. C., Rodrigues, R. F., and Soares, L. F. G. 2000. Improving the expressiveness of XML-based Hypermedia Authoring Languages, Proceedings of the Multimedia Modeling Conference - MMM'2000, Nagano, Japan, November 2000.
32. W3C. 2003. Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 Specification. Janeiro 2003. Disponível em http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/
33. des Rivieres, J., and Wiegand, J. 2004. Eclipse: A platform for integrating development tools. IBM Systems Journal. Disponível em http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/432/desrivieres.html
34. Eclipse.org. 2006. Visual Editor Project. Disponível em http://www.eclipse.org/vep/WebContent/main.php
35. Muchaluat-Saade, D. C. 1996. Browsers e Trilhas para Documentos Hipermídia Baseados em Modelos com Composições Aninhadas, Dissertação de Mestrado, Departamento de Informática, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro.
36. Furnas, G. 1986. Generalized Fisheye Views, Proceedings of CHI'86 Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, Abril, pp. 16-23.
37. NCL Eclipse. Disponível em http://laws.deinf.ufma.br/~ncleclipse/
38. Casanova, M. A., Tucherman, L., Lima, M. J. D., Netto, J. L. R., Rodriguez, N., and Soares, L.F.G. 1991. The nested context model for hyperdocuments. In Proceedings of the third annual ACM conference on Hypertext. ( San Antonio, Texas, United States, 1991)
39. Moreno, M. F., Costa, R. M. R., and Soares, L. F. G. 2008. Sincronismo entre Fluxos de Mídia Contínua e Aplicações Multimídia em Redes por Difusão. XIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Multimídia e Web - WebMedia2008. (Vila Velha, ES, 2008).
40. Guimarães, R. L., Soares Neto, C. S., Soares, L. F. G. 2008. A Visual Aproach for Modeling Spatiotemporal Relations. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Symposium on Document Engineering {VOL1, ISBN 978-1-60558-081-4, (09/2008)}