The role of skeletal muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders;Rola biopsji miȩśnia szkieletowego w diagnostyce chorób nerwowo-miȩśniowych

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 481-491

  Nadaj Pakleza, Aleksandra ^a   Kierdaszuk, Biruta ^b   Kamińska, Anna ^b  

^a PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Diagnostic methods; Muscle biopsy; Muscular dystrophy; Myopathy; Pathological changes in muscle

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; GLYCOGEN STORAGE DISEASE; INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS; MITOCHONDRIAL MYOPATHY; MUSCLE BIOPSY; MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; MYOPATHY; MYOSITIS; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE; OCULOPHARYNGEAL MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; REVIEW; SKELETAL MUSCLE; BIOPSY; CLASSIFICATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MUSCLE ATROPHY; MUSCLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY;

BIOPSY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; MUSCULAR ATROPHY; MUSCULAR DISEASES; MYOSITIS; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 78149312594     PISSN: 00283843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3843(14)60139-0     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Brink J. Open muscle biopsy. Oper Tech Gen Surg 2002; 4: 235-238.
2. Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I. [red.]. Choroby nerwowo- miȩśniowe. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1999.
3. Dubowitz V., Sewry C.A. The procedure of muscle biopsy. W: Dubowitz V., Sewry C.A. Muscle biopsy: a practical approach. Wyd. 3. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia 2007, ss. 3-39.
4. Kamińska A. Histopatologia i histochemia miȩśnia szkieletowego w normie i uszkodzeniach pierwotnie miȩśniowych. W: Drozdowski W. [red.]. Postȩpy w diagnostyce i leczeniu chorób miȩśni. Medycyna Praktyczna, Kraków 2004, ss. 11-12.
5. Jamshidi R., HarrisonM.R., Lee H. i wsp. Indication for pediatric muscle biopsy determines usefulness. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 2199-2201.
6. FilostoM., Tonin P., Vattemi G. i wsp. The role of muscle bio psy in investigating isolated muscle pain. Neurology 2007; 68: 181-186. (Pubitemid 46105734)
7. Anderson J.R. Recommendations for the biopsy procedure and assessment of skeletal muscle biopsies. Virchows Arch 1997; 431: 227-233.
8. Lai C.H., Melli G., Chang Y.J. i wsp. Open muscle biopsy in suspected myopathy: diagnostic yield and clinical utility. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17: 136-142.
9. Gene Table of Neuromuscular Disorders; dostȩpne na: http://www. musclegenetable.org.
10. th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005, ss. 893-895.
11. O'Ferrall E.K., Sinnreich M. The role of muscle biopsy in the age of genetic testing. Curr Opin Neurol 2009; 22: 543-553.
12. Nadaj-Pakleza A., Richard P., Lusakowska A. i wsp. Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of 9 Polish patients. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2009; 43: 113-120.
13. LagunoM., Miró O., PereaM. i wsp. Muscle diseases in elders: a 10-year retrospective study. J Gerontol Med Sci 2002; 57: M378-M384. (Pubitemid 34575730)
14. Lacomis D. The utility of muscle biopsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2004; 4: 81-86.
15. DalakasM.C., Hohlfeld R. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Lancet 2003; 362: 971-982.
16. th ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001, ss. 636-659.
17. Dalakas M.C. Sporadic inclusion body myositis - diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2006; 2: 437-447.
18. Engel W.K., Askanas V. Inclusion-body myositis. Clinical, diagnostic, and pathologic aspects. Neurology 2006; 66 (2 suppl 1): S20-S29. (Pubitemid 43739980)
19. Askanas V., Engel W.K., Nogalska A. Inclusion body myositis: a degenerative muscle disease associated with intra-muscle fiber multi-protein aggregates, proteasome inhibition, endoplasmic reticulum stress and decreased lysosomal degradation. Brain Pathol 2009; 19: 493-506.
20. Buchthal F., Kamieniecka Z. The diagnostic yield of quantified electromyography and quantified muscle biopsy in neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve 1982; 5: 265-280. (Pubitemid 12070781)
21. Al Saleh A., Oware A., Kane N. The correlation between EMG and muscle biopsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118: e145-e147.