Rendering stone fragments paramagnetic with iron-oxide microparticles improves the efficiency and effectiveness of endoscopic stone fragment retrieval

Urology

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1266.e10-1266.e14

  Tracy, Chad R ^a   McLeroy, Stacey L ^b   Best, Sara L ^c   Gnade, Bruce E ^b   Pearle, Margaret S ^c   Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM OXALATE; IRON OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CALCIUM OXALATE STONE; CYSTOSCOPY; DEVICE; EXTRACTION; HUMAN; INCUBATION TIME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UROLITHIASIS;

EID: 78149293957     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.067     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. A. Macejko, O.T. Okotie, and L.C. Zhao Computed tomography-determined stone-free rates for ureteroscopy of upper-tract stones J Endourol 23 2009 379 382
2. G.M. Preminger, D.G. Assimos, and J.E. Lingeman Report on Management of Staghorn Calculi, AUA Guidelines for management of staghorn calculi 2007 http://www.auanet.org Accessed July 22, 1010
3. G.M. Preminger, H.G. Tiselius, and D.G. Assimos Ureteral Calculi, AUA Guidelines for management of ureteral calculi 2007 http://www.auanet.org Accessed July 22, 1010
4. A.J. Portis, R. Rygwall, and C. Holtz Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi with active fragment extraction and computerized tomography followup J Urol 175 2006 2129 2133
5. A.R. El-Nahas, A.M. El-Assmy, and K. Madbouly Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones J Endourol 20 2006 870 874
6. M.M. Osman, Y. Alfano, and S. Kamp 5-Year follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Eur Urol 47 2005 860 864
7. N.P. Gupta, and A.K. Hemal Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth? Urology 59 2002 20 24
8. S.B. Streem, A. Yost, and E. Mascha Clinical implications of clinically insignificant store fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy J Urol 155 1996 1186 1190
9. J.D. Raman, A. Bagrodia, and A. Gupta Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy J Urol 181 2009 1163 1168
10. J.J. de la Rosette, T. Skrekas, and J.W. Segura Handling and prevention of complications in stone basketing Eur Urol 50 2006 991 998
11. F.G. El-Anany, H.M. Hammouda, and H.A. Maghraby Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for large renal calculi BJU Int 88 2001 850 853
12. M.K. Ankem, P.S. Lowry, and R.W. Slovick Clinical utility of dual active deflection flexible ureteroscope during upper tract ureteropyeloscopy Urology 64 2004 430 434
13. A.J. Portis, M.A. Laliberte, and S. Drake Intraoperative fragment detection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of high magnification rotational fluoroscopy combined with aggressive nephroscopy J Urol 175 2006 162 165
14. A. Bagrodia, and J.D. Raman Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques J Endourol 23 2009 627 633
15. M.S. Pearle, J.E. Lingeman, and R. Leveillee Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less J Urol 173 2005 S69 S73
16. D.M. Wilson Clinical and laboratory approaches for evaluation of nephrolithiasis J Urol 141 1989 770 774
17. D.B. Johnson, and M.S. Pearle Complications of ureteroscopy Urol Clin North Am 31 2004 157 171
18. M. Grasso Complications of ureteropyeloscopy S.S. Taneja, R.B. Smith, R.M. Ehrlich, Complications of Urologic Surgery 3rd Ed. 2001 W. B. Saunders Philadelphia 268 276