Optical one-way quantum computing with a simulated valence-bond solid

Nature Physics

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 850-854

  Kaltenbaek, Rainer ^a   Lavoie, Jonathan ^a   Zeng, Bei ^a,b   Bartlett, Stephen D ^c   Resch, Kevin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER COMPUTING; COMPUTATION THEORY; GROUND STATE; QUANTUM COMPUTERS;

CLUSTER STATE; ONE-WAY QUANTUM COMPUTATION; PHYSICAL SYSTEMS; QUANTUM COMPUTING; QUANTUM LOGIC GATE; QUANTUM MANY-BODY SYSTEMS; SPIN LATTICES; VALENCE-BOND SOLIDS;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 78149284629     PISSN: 17452473     EISSN: 17452481     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nphys1777     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188-5191 (2001).
2. Nielsen, M. A. Cluster-state quantum computation. Rep. Math. Phys. 57, 147-161 (2006).
3. Bartlett, S. D. & Rudolph, T. Simple nearest-neighbor two-body Hamiltonian system for which the ground state is a universal resource for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 74, 040302(2006).
4. Verstraete, F. & Cirac, J. I. Valence-bond states for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 70, 060302(2004).
5. Gross, D. & Eisert, J. Novel schemes for measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220503(2007).
6. Gross, D., Eisert, J., Schuch, N. & Perez-Garcia, D. Measurement-based quantum computation beyond the one-way model. Phys. Rev. A 76, 052315(2007).
7. Brennen, G. K. & Miyake, A. Measurement-based quantum computer in the gapped ground state of a two-body Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010502(2008).
8. Chen, X., Zeng, B., Gu, Z-C., Yoshida, B. & Chuang, I. L. Gapped two-body Hamiltonian whose unique ground state is universal for one-way quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 220501(2009).
9. Affleck, I., Kennedy, T., Lieb, E. H. & Tasaki, H. Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 799-802 (1987).
10. Raussendorf, R., Harrington, J. & Goyal, K. A fault-tolerant one-way quantum computer. Ann. Phys. 321, 2242-2270 (2006).
11. Walther, P. et al. Experimental one-way quantum computing. Nature 434, 169-176 (2005).
12. Prevedel, R. et al. High-speed linear optics quantum computing using active feed-forward. Nature 445, 65-69 (2007).
13. Vallone, G., Pomarico, E., De Martini, F. & Mataloni, P. One-way quantum computation with two-photon multiqubit cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 78, 042335(2008).
14. Tokunaga, Y., Kuwashiro, S., Yamamoto, T., Koashi, M. & Imoto, N. Generation of high-fidelity four-photon cluster state and quantum-domain demonstration of one-way quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210501(2008).
15. Biggerstaff, D. N. et al. Cluster-state quantum computing enhanced by high-fidelity generalized measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 240504(2009).
16. Gao, W-B. et al. Experimental realization of a controlled-NOT gate with four-photon six-qubit cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 020501(2010).
17. Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010501(2005).
18. Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L. & Nielsen, M. A. Noise thresholds for optical cluster-state quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 73, 052306(2006).
19. Gross, D., Flammia, S. T. & Eisert, J. Most quantum states are too entangled to be useful as computational resources. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190501(2009).
20. Verstraete, F., Murg, V. & Cirac, J. I. Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems. Adv. Phys. 57, 143-224 (2008).
21. Popp, M., Verstraete, F., Martín-Delgado, M. A. & Cirac, J. I. Localizable entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 71, 042306(2005).
22. Gross, D. & Eisert, J. Quantum computational webs. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/0810.2542 (2008).
23. Hagiwara, M., Katsumata, K., Affleck, I., Halperin, B. I. & Renard, J. P. Observation of S = 1/2 degrees of freedom in an S=1 linear-chain Heisenberg antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3181-3184 (1990).
24. Buluta, I. & Nori, F. Quantum simulators. Science 326, 108-111 (2009).
25. Howell, J. C., Lamas-Linares, A. & Bouwmeester, D. Experimental violation of a spin-1 bell inequality using maximally entangled four-photon states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401(2002).
26. Lanyon, B. P. et al. Manipulating biphotonic qutrits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060504(2008).
27. Darmawan, A. S. & Bartlett, S. D. Optical spin-1 chain and its use as a quantum-computational wire. Phys. Rev. A 82, 012328(2010).
28. Jozsa, R. Fidelity for mixed quantum states. J. Mod. Opt. 41, 2315-2323 (1994).
29. Kwiat, P. G., Waks, E., White, A. G., Appelbaum, I. & Eberhard, P. H. Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons. Phys. Rev. A 60, R773-R776 (1999).
30. Lavoie, J., Kaltenbaek, R. & Resch, K. J. Experimental violation of Svetlichny's inequality. New J. Phys. 11, 073051(2009).
31. Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Kwiat, P. G. & Zeilinger, A. Dense coding in experimental quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4656-4659 (1996).