Apportionment of institutional votes for the nomenclature section: A rebuttal to smith & al

Taxon

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1567-1570

  Applequist, Wendy L ^a   Callmander, Martin W ^a,b   Davidse, Gerrit ^a   Sennikov, Alexander ^c,d   Thulin, Mats ^e   Vorster, Piet ^f   Yatskievych, George ^a  

^a MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^b Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la ville de Genève ^*  (Switzerland)

^c Finnish Museum of Natural History   (Russian Federation)

^d KOMAROV BOTANICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^e UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Acacia; Developing nations; Institutions; International botanical congress; International code of botanical nomenclature; Voting

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGUME; NOMENCLATURE; TAXONOMY;

ACACIA;

EID: 78149275812     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.595020     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. McNeill, J. & Turland, N. J. 2009. Institutional Votes at the Nomenclature Section of the XVIII International Botanical Congress, Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Taxon 58: 971-973.
2. Moore, G. 2007. The handling of the proposal to conserve the name Acacia at the 17th International Botanical Congress-an attempt at minority rule. Bothalia 37: 109-118.
3. Orchard, A.E. & Maslin, B.R. 2003. Proposal to conserve the name Acacia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) with a conserved type. Taxon 52: 362-363.
4. Smith, G.F., Figueiredo, E. & Moore, G. 2010. Who amends the International code of botanical nomenclature? Taxon 59: 930-934.
5. Smith, G.F., Van Wyk, A.E., Luckow, M. & Schrire, B. 2006. Conserving Acacia Mill. with a conserved type. What happened in Vienna? Taxon 55: 223-225.