Use of breast MRI surveillance in women at high risk for breast cancer: A single-institutional experience

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2010, Pages

  Elmore, Leisha ^a   Margenthaler, Julie A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIOTHERAPY; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GENES, BRCA1; GENES, BRCA2; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MUTATION; NEOPLASM STAGING; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149270828     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1236-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ries L, Kosary C, Hankey B. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2000. USA National Cancer Institute 2003.
2. M Kriege C Brekelmans C Boetes, et al. 2004 Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition N Engl J Med. 351 427 437 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmtFalu7o%3D 10.1056/NEJMoa031759 15282350
3. CK Kuhl S Schrading CC Leutner, et al. 2005 Mammography, breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer J Clin Oncol. 23 8469 8476 10.1200/JCO.2004.00. 4960 16293877
4. CD Lehman JD Blume P Weatherall, et al. 2005 Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging Cancer. 103 1898 1905 10.1002/cncr.20971 15800894
5. MJ Stoutjesdijk C Boetes GJ Jager, et al. 2001 Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst. 93 1095 1102 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvisVamuw%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1095 11459871
6. E Warner DB Plewes KA Hill, et al. 2004 Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, clinical breast examination JAMA. 292 1317 1325 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXns12rs78%3D 10.1001/jama.292.11.1317 15367553
7. CK Kuhl S Schrading E Wardelmann, et al. 2007 Magnetic resonance imaging versus mammography for diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situ J Clin Oncol. 25 1504 1510
8. CK Kuhl S Schrading HB Bieling, et al. 2007 MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study Lancet. 370 485 492 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61232-X 17693177
9. D Saslow C Boetes W Burke, et al. 2007 American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J Clin. 57 75 89 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 17392385
10. P Carney D Miglioretti B Yankaskas 2003 Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med. 138 168 175 12558355
11. MT Mandelson N Oestreicher PL Porter, et al. 2000 Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst. 92 1081 1087 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvivFyrtA%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081 10880551
12. RD Rosenberg WC Hunt MR Williamson, et al. 1998 Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183, 134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico Radiology. 209 511 518 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FisVOisQ%3D%3D 9807581
13. SE Harms DP Flamig KL Hesley MD Meiches RA Jensen WP Evans 1993 MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation Radiology. 187 493 501 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3jsVOluw%3D%3D 8475297
14. JM Hrung SS Sonnad JS Schwartz CP Langlotz 1999 Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis Acad Radiol. 6 387 397 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzjvVemsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80189-5 10410164
15. NHGM Peters IHMB Rinkes NPA Zuithoff WPTM Mali KGM Moons PHM Peeters 2008 Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions Radiology. 246 116 124 10.1148/radiol.2461061298 18024435
16. M Gail L Brinton D Byar D Corle S Green C Schairer 1989 Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually J Natl Cancer Inst. 81 1879 1886 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FnvF2kuw%3D%3D 10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 2593165
17. EB Claus N Risch WD Thompson 1994 Autosomal dominant inheritance of early onset breast cancer Cancer. 73 643 651 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7jtVagug%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<643::AID-CNCR2820730323>3.0.CO;2-5 8299086
18. Y Miki J Swenson S Shattuck-Eidens, et al. 1994 A strong candidate gene for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 Science. 266 66 71 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXhtF2ns70%3D 10.1126/science.7545954 7545954
19. DM Euhus AM Leitch JF Huth, et al. 2002 Limitations of the Gail model in the specialized breast cancer risk assessment clinic Breast J. 8 23 27 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08005.x 11856157
20. KF Hoskins A Zwaagstra M Ranz 2006 Validation of a tool for identifying women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer in population-based screening Cancer. 107 1769 1776 10.1002/cncr.22202 16967460
21. C Taneja J Edelsberg D Weycker A Guo G Oster J Weinreb 2009 Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced MRI in high risk women J Am Coll Radiol. 6 171 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.10.003 19248993