Utilizing GQM+strategies for business value analysis: An approach for evaluating business goals

ESEM 2010 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Mandić, Vladimir ^a   Basili, Victor ^b   Harjumaa, Lasse ^a   Oivo, Markku ^a   Markkula, Jouni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b Fraunhofer USA Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

benefits realization; business value analysis; GQM+Strategies; software metrics; value goals; value based software engineering

Indexed keywords

BENEFITS REALIZATION; BUSINESS VALUE; GQM+STRATEGIES; SOFTWARE METRICS; VALUE GOALS; VALUE-BASED;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; VALUE ENGINEERING;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 78149253973     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1852786.1852813     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Evaluation of a Software Requirements Document By Analysis of Change Data, San Diego; USA, 1981. IEEE Press.
2. V. Basili. The experience factory and its relationship to other improvement paradigms. In I. Sommerville et al., editors, Software Engineering - ESEC '93, LNCS 717, pages 68-83. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1993.
3. V. Basili, G. Caldiera, and D. Rombach. Goal question metric paradigm. In J. Marciniak, editor, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Volume 1, pages 528-532. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994.
4. V. Basili, J. Heidrich, M. Lindvall, J. Münch, M. Regardie, D. Rombach, et al. Bridging the gap between business strategy and software development. pages 1-16, Montreal, Canada, 2007. Twenty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems.
5. V. Basili, J. Heidrich, M. Lindvall, J. Münch, M. Regardie, D. Rombach, et al. GQM+Strategies: A comprehensive methodology for aligning business strategies with software measurement. pages 1-14, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2007. MetriKon 2007.
6. V. Basili, J. Heidrich, M. Lindvall, J. Münch, M. Regardie, and A. Trendowicz. GQM+Strategies -aligning business strategies with software measurement. pages 488-490, Madrid, Spain, 2007. First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2007.
7. V. Basili, J. Heidrich, M. Lindvall, J. Münch, C. Seaman, M. Regardie, et al. Determining the impact of business strategies using principles from goal-oriented measurement. pages 1-10, Wien, Austria, 2009. 9. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik 2009.
8. V. Basili, M. Lindvall, M. Regardie, C. Seaman, J. Heidrich, J. Münch, et al. Linking software development and business strategy through measurement. IEEE Computer, 43(4):57-65, 2010.
9. V. Basili and D. Weiss. A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10(6):728-738, 1984. (Pubitemid 15461894)
10. M. Berry and A. Aurum. Measurement and decision making. In B. Boehm et al., editors, Value-Based Software Engineering, pages 155-177. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
11. S. Biffl, A. Aurum, B. Boehm, H. Erdogmus, and P. Grünbacher. Value-Based Software Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
12. G. Böckle, P. Clements, J. McGregor, D. Muthig, and K. Schmid. Calculating ROI for software product lines. IEEE Software, 3(21):23-31, 2004.
13. B. Boehm. Value-based software engineering. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2(28):3-15, 2003.
14. B. Boehm. Value-based software engineering: Overview and agenda. Technical report, USC-CSE-2005-504, University of Southern California, Park Campus, Los Angeles, 2005.
15. B. Boehm. Value-based software engineering: Overview and agenda. In S. Biffl et al., editors, Value-Based Software Engineering, pages 3-14. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 2005.
16. B. Boehm and L. Huang. Value-based software engineering: a case study. Computer, 3(36):33-41, 2003.
17. E. Brynjolfsson and L. Hitt. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4):23-48, 2000.
18. K. El Emam. The ROI from Software Quality. Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005.
19. H. Erdogmus, J. Favaro, and W. Strigel. Return on investment. IEEE Software, 3(21):18-22, 2004.
20. S. Faulk, R. Harmon, and D. Raffo. Value-based software engineering (vbse): A value-driven approach to product-line engineering. pages 1-13, Denver, Colorado, 2000. the First International Conference on Software Product-Line Engineering.
21. P. Grünbacher, S. Köszegi, and S. Biffl. Stakeholder value proposition elicitation and reconciliation. In S. Biffl et al., editors, Value-Based Software Engineering, pages 133-154. Springer-Verlag, Berline Heidelberg, 2006.
22. M. Halling, S. Biffl, and P. Grünbacher. An economic approach for improving requirements negotiation models with inspection. Requirements Engineering, 8(4):236-247, 2003.
23. W. Harrison. Risk and the economic value of the software producer. In S. Biffl et al., editors, Value-Based Software Engineering, pages 91-105. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.
24. T. Little. Value creation and capture: A model of the software development process. IEEE Software, 3(21):48-53, 2004.
25. V. Mandić, L. Harjumaa, J. Markkula, and M. Oivo. Early empirical assessment of the practical value of GQM+Strategies. In Y. Yang et al., editors, International Conference on Software Process, ICSP 2010, pages 14-25. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
26. D. Reifer. Making the Software Business Case: Improvement by the Numbers. Addison-Wesley, Boston, USA, 2002.
27. C. Rodger and J. Petch. Uncertainty and Risk Analysis: A practical guide from Business Dynamics. Business Dynamics, PricewaterhouseCoopers, United Kingdom, 1999.
28. D. Sharma, A. Aurum, and B. Paech. Business value through product line engineering -a case study. pages 167-174, Parma, 2008. 34th Euromicro Conference Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA'08.
29. R. Thomas. Business value analysis: -coping with unruly uncertainty. Strategy & Leadership, 29(2):16-24, 2001.
30. J. Thorp. The information paradox: realizing the business benefits of information technology. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto, Canada, 2003.
31. L. Tierstein. Managing a designer/2000 project. pages 1-6, USA, 1997. Whitepaper, presented at the New York Oracle Users Group Conference (NYOUG Fall ?97).
32. R. van Solingen. Measuring the ROI of software process improvement. IEEE Software, 3(21):32-38, 2004.
33. R. van Solingen and E. Berghout. The Goal/Question/Metric Method: a practical guide for quality improvement of software development. The McGraw-Hill Company, Maidenhead; England, 1999.