Hot or not-evaluating the effect of artificial tanning on the public's perception of attractiveness

Dermatologic Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1651-1655

  Chung, Vinh Q ^a   Gordon, Justin S ^b   Veledar, Emir ^b   Chen, Suephy C ^b  

^a Vanguard Dermatology and Skin Cancer Specialists   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN COLOR; SUN EXPOSURE; ESTHETICS; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SKIN PIGMENTATION; SUNBATHING; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

ADULT; BEAUTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; SKIN PIGMENTATION; SUNBATHING; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149235091     PISSN: 10760512     EISSN: 15244725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01713.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Karagas MR, Stannard VA, Mott LA, et al,. Use of tanning devices and risk of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 224-6.
2. Veierod MB, Weiderpass E, Thorn M, et al,. A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1530-8.
3. Lazovich D, Forster J., Indoor tanning by adolescents: prevalence, practices and policies. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 20-7. (Pubitemid 40029656)
4. Santmyire BR, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB Jr., Lifestyle high-risk behaviors and demographics may predict the level of participation in sun-protection behaviors and skin cancer primary prevention in the United States: results of the 1998 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2001; 92: 1315-24.
5. Cokkinides VE, Weinstock MA, O'Connell MC, Thun MJ., Use of indoor tanning sunlamps by US youth, ages 11-18 years, and by their parent or guardian caregivers: prevalence and correlates. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 1124-30.
6. Demko CA, Borawski EA, Debanne SM, et al,. Use of indoor tanning facilities by white adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003; 157: 854-60.
7. Geller AC, Colditz G, Oliveria S, et al,. Use of sunscreen, sunburning rates, and tanning bed use among more than 10,000 US children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 1009-14.
8. Stryker JE, Lazovich D, Forster JL, et al,. Maternal/female caregiver influences on adolescent indoor tanning. J Adolesc Health 2004; 35: e1-9.
9. Quick stats: percentage of teens aged 14-17 years who used indoor tanning devices during the preceding 12 months, by sex and age-United States, 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006; 55: 1101.
10. Mahler HI, Kulik JA, Harrell J, et al,. Effects of UV photographs, photoaging information, and use of sunless tanning lotion on sun protection behaviors. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141: 373-80.
11. Mosher CE, Danoff-Burg S., Social predictors of sunscreen and self-tanning product use. J Am Coll Health 2005; 54: 166-8.
12. Robinson JK, Kim J, Rosenbaum S, Ortiz S., Indoor tanning knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among young adults from 1988-2007. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 484-8.
13. Hoerster KD, Mayer JA, Woodruff SI, et al,. The influence of parents and peers on adolescent indoor tanning behavior: findings from a multi-city sample. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57: 990-7.
14. Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, et al, SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2006, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2009 (accessed June 20, 2009).
15. Knight JM, Kirincich AN, Farmer ER, Hood AF., Awareness of the risk of tanning lamps does not influence behavior among college students. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138: 1311-5.
16. Hillhouse J, Turrisi R., Skin cancer risk behaviors: a conceptual framework for complex behavioral change. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141: 1028-31.