Corpus-based analysis on cross-domain experiments in classification-and-ranking generation

Journal of Computer Science

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1326-1333

  Mustapha, Aida ^a   Sulaiman, Md Nasir ^a   Mahmod, Ramlan ^a   Selamat, Mohd Hasan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Classification and ranking; Corpus based; Dialogue systems; Natural language generation; Open domain

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049516572     PISSN: 15493636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2010.1326.1333     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allen, J.F., L.K. Schubert, G. Ferguson, P. Heeman and C.H. Hwang et al., 1995. The TRAINS project: A case study in building a conversational planning agent. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell., 7: 7-48. DOI: 10.1080/09528139508953799.
2. Bangalore, S. and O. Rambow, 2000. Exploiting a probabilistic hierarchical model for generation. Proceeding of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, July 31-Aug. 4, Association for Computational Linguistics, Saarbrucken, Germany, pp: 42-48. DOI: 10.3115/990820.990827.
3. Belz, A., 2005. Statistical generation: Three methods compared and evaluated. Proceeding of the 10th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Aug. 8-10, CiteSeerX, USA., pp: 15-23. http://www.itri.brighton.ac.uk/~Anja.Belz/Publications/belz-enlg05.pdf.
4. Chambers, N. and J. Allen, 2004. Stochastic language generation in a dialogue system: Toward a domain independent generator. Proceeding of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Apr. 30-May 1, Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, USA., pp: 1-11.
5. Chen, J., S. Bangalore, O. Rambow and M.A. Walker, 2002. Towards automatic generation of natural language generation systems. Proceeding of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Aug. 24-Sept. 1, Association for Computational Linguistics, Taipei, Taiwan, pp: 1-7. DOI: 10.3115/1072228.1072366.
6. Core, M.G. and J.F. Allen, 1997. Coding dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme. Proceeding of the Working Notes of AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, Nov. 8-10, CiteSeerX, Boston, MA., pp: 28-35.
7. Daniel, J., R. Bates, N. Coccaro, R. Martin and M. Meteer et al., 1997. Switchboard discourse language modeling project report. Center for Speech and Language Processing. http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26dbd915d0585f37c37c40bb97f4dc797/sonntag?layout=plain.
8. Halliday, M.A.K., 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. J. Linguist., 3: 199-244. http://www.jstor.org/pss/4174965.
9. Hoeven, G.F.V.D., G.A. Andernach, S.V. van de Burgt, G.J.M. Kruijff and A. Nijholt et al., 1995. SCHISMA: A natural language accessible theatre information and booking system. Proceeding of the 1st International Workshop on Applications of Natural Language to Data Bases, June 28-29, PubZone, Versailles, France, pp: 271-285.
10. Langkilde, I. and K. Knight, 1998. Generation that exploits corpus-based statistical knowledge. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Aug. 10-14, Association for Computational Linguistics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp: 704-710. DOI: 10.3115/980845.980963.
11. Marciniak, T. and M. Strube, 2004. Classificationbased generation using TAG. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., 3123: 100-109. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27823-8.
12. McKeown, K., 1985. Text generation (Studies in Natural Language Processing). 1st Edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 10: 0521301165, pp: 264.
13. Mustapha, A. M.N. Sulaiman, R. Mahmod and H. Selamat, 2008. Classification-and-ranking architecture for response generation based on intentions. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Network Secur., 8: 253-258. http://paper.ijcsns.org/07_book/200812/20081236.pdf.
14. Reiter, E. and C. Mellish, 1992. Using classification to generate text. Proceeding of the 30th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, June 28-July 2, Association for Computational Linguistics, Newark, Delaware, pp: 265-272. DOI: 10.3115/981967.982001.
15. Saat, N.Z.M., K. Ibrahim and A.A. Jemain, 2010. Bayesian methods for ranking the severity of apnea among patients. Am. J. Applied Sci., 7: 167-170. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2010.167.170.
16. Stent, A.J., 2000. The Monroe corpus. University of Rochester. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=898497.
17. Traum, D.R. and E.A. Hinkelman, 1992. Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue. Comput. Intel., 8: 575-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x.
18. Tan, T.S. and S. Hussain, 2009. Corpus design for Malay corpus-based speech synthesis system. Am. J. Applied Sci., 6: 696-702. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2009.696.702.
19. Varges, S. and M. Purver, 2006. Robust language analysis and generation for spoken dialogue systems. Proceeding of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Workshop on Development and Evaluation of Robust Spoken Dialogue Systems for Real Applications, Aug. 29-Sept. 1, Riva del Garda, Trentino, Italy, pp: 1-4.
20. Ward, N., 1994. A Connectionist Language Generator. Ablex Pub., Norwood, New Jersey, ISBN: 10: 1567500382, pp: 310.