Reconfigurable semi-analytic sensitivity methods and MDO architectures within the πMDO framework

12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, MAO

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Marriage, Christopher J ^a   Martins, Joaquim R R A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC IMPLEMENTATION; EFFICIENT METHOD; EXISTING STRUCTURE; HYBRID APPROACH; MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROBLEMS; OBJECT ORIENTED; PERFORMANCE GAIN; PROBLEM STATEMENT; RE-CONFIGURABLE; SENSITIVITY METHODS; SOFTWARE FRAMEWORKS;

COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 78049496190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. N. M. Alexandrov and S. Kodiyalam. Initial results of an MDO evaluation survey. AIAA Paper 98-4884, 1998.
2. N. M. Alexandrov and R. M. Lewis. Comparative properties of collaborative optimization and other approaches to MDO. In Proceedings of the First ASMO UK/ISSMO Conference on Engineering Design Optimization, 1999.
3. N. M. Alexandrov and R. M. Lewis. Reconfigurability in mdo problem synthesis, part 1. AIAA Paper 2004-4307, Aug. 2004.
4. N. M. Alexandrov and R. M. Lewis. Reconfigurability in mdo problem synthesis, part 2. AIAA Paper 2004-4308, Aug. 2004.
5. R. D. Braun. Collaborative Optimization: An Architecture for Large-Scale Distributed Design. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, Oct. 1996.
6. I. R. Chittick and J. R. R. A. Martins. An asymmetric suboptimization approach to aerostructural optimization. Optimization and Engineering, 2008. (In press).
7. E. J. Cramer, J. E. Dennis, P. D. Frank, R. M. Lewis, and G. R. Shubin. Problem formulation for multidisciplinary optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 4(4):754-776, 1994.
8. V. DeMiguel and W. Murray. An analysis of collaborative optimization methods. AIAA Paper 2000-4720, Aug. 2000.
9. C. A. Mader. ADJoint: An Approach for the Rapid Development of Discrete Adjoint Solvers. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Oct. 2007.
10. J. R. R. A. Martins. A Coupled-Adjoint Method for High-Fidelity Aero-Structural Optimization. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, Oct. 2002.
11. J. R. R. A. Martins, J. J. Alonso, and J. J. Reuther. High-fidelity aerostructural design optimization of a supersonic business jet. Journal of Aircraft, 41(3):523-530, 2004.
12. J. R. R. A. Martins, J. J. Alonso, and J. J. Reuther. A coupled-adjoint sensitivity analysis method for high-fidelity aero-structural design. Optimization and Engineering, 6(1):33-62, March 2005.
13. J. R. R. A. Martins, I. M. Kroo, and J. J. Alonso. An automated method for sensitivity analysis using complex variables. AIAA Paper 2000-0689, Jan. 2000.
14. J. R. R. A. Martins, C. Marriage, and N. P. Tedford. MDO: An object-oriented framework for multidisciplinary design optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2008. (Accepted).
15. J. R. R. A. Martins, P. Sturdza, and J. J. Alonso. The connection between the complex-step derivative approximation and algorithmic differentiation. AIAA Paper 2001-0921, Jan. 2001.
16. J. R. R. A. Martins, P. Sturdza, and J. J. Alonso. The complex-step derivative approximation. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 29(3):245-262, 2003.
17. R. E. Perez. A Multidisciplinary Optimization Framework for Flight Dynamics and Control Integration in Aircraft Design. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, 2006.
18. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski. Sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems. AIAA Journal, 28(1):153-160, 1990.
19. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski. Optimization by decomposition: a step from heirarchic to non-heirarchic systems. Technical report, 1998.
20. N. P. Tedford and J. R. R. A. Martins. Comparison of MDO architectures within a universal framework. AIAA Paper 2006-1017, May 2006.