Social capital and individual innovativeness in university research networks

Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 105-117

  Casanueva, Cristóbal ^a   Gallego, Ángeles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Individual level; Innovativeness; Network structure; Resources; Social capital; University research

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049489572     PISSN: 14479338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/impp.12.1.105     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adler P and Kwon S (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17-40.
2. Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3): 425-456.
3. Barclay D, Higgins C and Thompson R (1995) The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration, Technology Studies 2(2): 285-309.
4. Batjargal B (2003) Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: a longitudinal study, Organization Studies 24(4):534-556.
5. Bell GG (2005) Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness, Strategic Management Journal 26: 287-295.
6. Borgatti SP, Everett M and Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Natick MA.
7. Borgatti SP, Jones C and Everett MG (1998) Network measures of social capital, Connections 21(2): 27-36.
8. Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital, in Richardson JG (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, New York.
9. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
10. Burt RS (1997) The contingent value of social capital, Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2): 339-365.
11. Carmines EG and Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage, Beverly Hills CA.
12. Carr C, Castilhos M, Davis D, Snyder M and Stecher B (1982) Cost-benefit analysis in educational evaluation, Studies in Educational Evaluation 8: 75-85.
13. Chen Y, Gupta A and Hoshower L (2006) Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: an expectancy theory analysis, Journal of Education for Business 81(4): 179-189.
14. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling, in Marcoulides GA (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.
15. Chin WW, Marcolin BL and Newsted PR (1996) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study, in DeGross JI, Jarvenpaa S and Srinivasan A (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems. Cleveland OH.
16. Cohen WM and Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152.
17. Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology 94 (Suppl):S95-S120.
18. Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal 34(3): 555-590.
19. Dyer JH and Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledgesharing network: the Toyota case, Strategic Management Journal21(3): 345-367.
20. Florin J, Lubatkin M and Schulze W (2003) A social capital model of high growth ventures, Academy of Management Journal 46(3): 374-384.
21. Fornell C and Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39-50.
22. Gabarro JJ (1978) The development of trust, influence, and expectations, in A.G. Athos and J.J. Gabarro (Eds.), Interpersonal behaviours: Communication and understanding in relationships. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
23. Gargiulo M and Benassi M (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital, Organization Science 11(2): 183-196.
24. Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology 91:481-510.
25. Granovetter MS (1992) Problems of explanation in economic sociology, in Nohria N and Eccles R (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.
26. Gulati R (1995a) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances, Academy of Management Journal 38: 85-112.
27. Gulati R (1995b) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 619-652.
28. Gulati R (1999) Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation, Strategic Management Journal 20: 397-420.
29. Gulati R, Nohria N and Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks, Strategic Management Journal 21 : 203-215.
30. Ibarra H (1993) Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles, Academy of Management Journal 36(3): 471-501.
31. Inkpen AC, Tsang EW (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer, Academy of Management Journal 30(1): 146-165.
32. Kogut B and Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science 3(3): 383-397.
33. Koka B and Prescott J (2002) Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view, Strategic Management Journal 23: 795-816.
34. Kostova T and Roth K (2003) Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation, Academy of Management Review 28(2): 297-317.
35. Laundry R, Amara N and Lamari M (2002) Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69: 681-701.
36. Leana CR and Van Buren III HJ (1999) Organizational social capital and employment practices, Academy of Management Review 24(3): 538-555.
37. Lin N (1999) Building a network theory of social capital, Connections 22(1): 28-51
38. Marsh HW and Hattie J (2002) The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs?, The Journal of Higher Education 79(5): 603-641.
39. McFadyen MA and Cannella AA (2005) Knowledge creation and the location of university research scientist interpersonal exchange relations: Within and beyond the university, Strategic Organization 3(2): 131-155.
40. Moran P (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance, Strategic Management Journal 26: 1129-1151.
41. Murray F (2004) The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life, Research Policy 33(4): 643-659.
42. Nahapiet J and Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242-266.
43. Nohria N and Eccles RG 1992 Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action. Harvard Business School Review, Boston MA.
44. Nunnally J (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
45. Podolny JM and Page L (1998). Network forms of organization, Annual Review of Sociology 24.
46. Podolny JM and Baron JN (1997) Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace, American Sociological Review 62(5): 673-693.
47. Portes A (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology, Annual Review of Sociology24: 1-24.
48. Powell WW, Koput KW and Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quaterly 41(1): 116-145.
49. Quinn JB, Anderson P and Finkelstein S (1996) Leveraging intellect, The Academy of Management Executive 10(3): 7-25.
50. Rodan S and Galunic C (2004) More than networks structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness, Strategic Management Journal 25: 541-562.
51. Shan W, Walker G and Kogut B (1994) Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal 15:387-394.
52. Shipilov A (2006) Network strategies and performance of Canadian investment banks, Academy of Management Journal. 49(3): 590-604.
53. Tallman S, Jenkins M, Henry N and Pinch S (2004) Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review 29: 258-271.
54. Tsai W (2000) Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages, Strategic Management Journal 21: 925-939.
55. Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance, Academy of Management Journal44(5): 996-1004.
56. Tsai W and Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464-476.
57. Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect, American Sociological Review 61: 674-698.
58. Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quaterly 42: 35-67.
59. Walker G, Kogut B and Shan W (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network, Organization Science 8(2): 109-125.
60. Wasserman S and Faust K (1994) Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige.
61. Williamson IO and Cable DM (2003) Predicting early career research productivity: The case of management faculty, Journal of Organizational Behavior 24(1): 25-44.
62. Woerdeman DL and Van der Meulen Rodgers Y (2006). Work styles, attitudes, and productivity of scientists in the Netherlands and United Kingdom: A comparison by gender, Management Revue 17(2): 184-202.
63. Zaheer A and Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance, Strategic Management Journal 26: 809-825.