Test review: Canadian academic english language (CAEL) assessment

Language Testing

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 631-636

  Malone, Margaret E ^a  

^a CENTER FOR APPLIED LINGUISTICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049465961     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: 14770946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265532210384265     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. CAEL Assessment administration manual (2009). Ottawa: CAEL Assessment Office.
2. CAEL Assessment test score and users' guide (2008). Ottawa: Carleton University.
3. Fox J. (2003). From products to process: An ecological approach to bias detection. International Journal of Testing, 3(1), 21-48.
4. Fox J. (2004). Test decisions over time: Tracking validity. Language Testing, 21(4), 437-465.
5. Fox J. (2005). Re-thinking Second Language (L2) Admission Requirements: Problems with language-residency criteria and the need for language assessment and support. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(2), 85-115.
6. Fox J. (2008). Moderating top-down policy impact and supporting EAP curricular renewal: Exploring the potential of diagnostic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 26-42.
7. ILTA: Draft Code of Practice (Version 3). (21 June 2005). Retrieved 21 May 2008 from www.iltaonline.com/CoP_3.1.htm.
8. Jennings M., Fox J., Graves B., and Shohamy E. (1999). The test-takers' choice: An investigation of the effect of topic on language-test performance. Language Testing, 16(4), 426-456.
9. Messick S. (1989). Validity. In RL Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.