The evolution of CSR life-history strategies in a plant model with explicit physiology and architecture

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 222, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-10

  Bornhofen, S ^a   Barot, S ^b   Lattaud, C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE CERGY PONTOISE   (France)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Disturbance; Evolution; L systems; Life history strategies; Resource availability

Indexed keywords

DISTURBANCE; EVOLUTION; L-SYSTEMS; LIFE HISTORY; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

ECOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY);

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISTURBANCE; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; LIFE HISTORY; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

EID: 78049454430     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allen M., Prusinkiewicz P., DeJong T. Using L-systems for modeling source-sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. New Phytol. 2005, 166:869-880.
2. Barot S., Ugolini A., Bekal Brikci F. When do soil decomposers and ecosystem engineers enhance plant production?. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:1-10.
3. Bornhofen S., Lattaud C. Life history evolution of virtual plants: trading off between growth and reproduction. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2006, 4193:808-817.
4. Bornhofen S., Lattaud C. Evolution of virtual plants interacting with their environment. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Virtual Reality (VRIC'07) 2007, 172-176.
5. Bornhofen, S., 2008. Emergence de dynamiques évolutionnaires dans une approche multi-agents de plantes virtuelles. PhD Thesis, Paris Sud, Paris.
6. Bornhofen S., Lattaud C. Competition and evolution in virtual plant communities: a new modeling approach. Nat. Comput. 2009, 8(2):349-438.
7. Boudsocq S., Lata J.C., Mathieu J., Abbadie L., Barot S. Modelling approach to analyze the effects of nitrification inhibition on primary production. Funct. Ecol. 2009, 23:220-230.
8. Chapin F., Autumn K., Pugnaire F. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. Am. Nat. 1993, 142:78-92.
9. Chomsky N. Syntactic Structures 1957, Mouton, The Hague.
10. Cody M., Overton J. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant populations. J. Ecol. 1996, 84:53-61.
11. Crawley M.J. Plant-Herbivore Dynamics, Plant Ecology 1996, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, pp. 401-474.
12. Daufresne T., Hedin L.O. Plant coexistence depends on ecosystem nutrient cycles: extension of the resource-ratio theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:9212-9217.
13. Davidson R. Effect of root/leaf temperature differentials on root/shoot ratios in some pasture grasses and clover. Ann. Bot. 1969, 33:561-569.
14. Dieckmann U. Can adaptive dynamics invade?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12:128-131.
15. Ebner M., Grigore A., Heffner A., Albert J. Coevolution produces an arms race among virtual plants. Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Genetic Programming 2002, 316-325. J. Foster, E. Lutton, J. Miller, C. Ryan, A. Tettamanzi (Eds.).
16. Fick A. Über diffusion. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 1855, 170:59-86.
17. Fornara D.A., Tilman D. Ecological mechanisms associated with the positive diversity-productivity relationship in an N-limited grassland. Ecology 2009, 90:408-418.
18. Foster S., Janson J. The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants. Ecology 1985, 66:773-780.
19. Fussmann G.F., Loreau M., Abrams P.A. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:465-477.
20. Geritz S.A.H., Gyllenberg M. Seven answers from adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18:1174-1177.
21. Geritz S.A.H., Kisdi E., Yan P. Evolutionary branching and long-term coexistence of cycling predators: critical function analysis. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2007, 71:424-435.
22. Geritz S.A.H., Kisdi E., Meszéna G., Metz J.A.J. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 1998, 12:35-57.
23. Grime J. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 1977, 111:1169-1194.
24. Gurevitch J., Scheiner S.M., Fox G.A. The Ecology of Plants 2006, Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, USA.
25. Hector A., Schmid B., Beierkuhnlein C., Caldeira M.C., Diemer M., Dimitrakopoulos P.G., Finn J.A., Freitas H., Giller P.S., Good J., Harris R., Högberg P., Huss-Danell K., Joshi J., Jumpponen A., Körner C., Leadley W., Loreau M., Minns A., Mulder C.P.H., O'Donovan G., Otway S.J., Pereira J.S., Prinz A., Read D.J., Sherer-Lorenzen M., Schulze E.-D., Siamantziouras A.-S.D., Spehn E.M., Terry A.C., Troubis A.Y., Woodward F.I., Yachi S., Lawton J.H. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 1999, 286:1123-1126.
26. Jacob C. Genetic L-system programming. PPSN III. The 3rd International Conference on Evolutionary Computation 1994, 334-343. Y. Davudor, H. Schwefel, R. Maenner (Eds.).
27. Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis 1986, Springer-Verlag, New York.
28. Jones C.G., Lawton J.H., Shachack M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 1994, 69:373-386.
29. Kéfi S., van Baalen M., Rietkerk M., Loreau M. Evolution of local facilitation in arid ecosystems. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:E1-E17.
30. Kisdi E., Geritz S.A.H. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation in diploid populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:1671-1678.
31. Lindenmayer A. Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. parts I and II. J. Theo. Biol. 1968, 18:280-315.
32. Loeuille N., Leibold M.A. Ecological consequences of evolution in plant defenses in a metacommunity. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2008, 74:34-45.
33. Loreau M., Naeem S., Inchausti P., Bengtsson J., Grime J.P., Hector A., Hooper D.U., Huston M.A., Raffaelli D., Schmid B., Tilman D., Wardle D.A. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 2001, 294:804-808.
34. MacArthur R., Wilson E. The Theory of Island Biogeography 1967, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
35. Menge D.N.L., Levin S.A., Hedin L.O. Evolutionary tradeoffs can select against nitrogen fixation and thereby maintain nitrogen limitation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:1573-1578.
36. Mustard M., Standing D., Aitkenhead M., Robinson D., Mc-Donald A. The emergence of primary strategies in evolving plant populations. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2003, 5:1067-1081.
37. Ochoa, G., 1998. On genetic algorithms and lindenmayer systems. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature V, pp. 335-344.
38. Pacala S.W., Canham C.D., Saponora J., Silander J.A., Kobe R.K., Ribbens E. Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 1996, 66:1-43.
39. Perttunen J., Sievnen R., Nikinmaa E. Lignum: A model combining the structure and functioning of trees. Ecol. Modell. 1998, 108:189-198.
40. Pianka E. On r- and K-selection. Am. Nat. 1970, 104:592-597.
41. Prusinkiewicz P., Lindenmayer A. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants 1990, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
42. Room P., Hanan J., Prusinkiewicz P. Virtual plants: new perspectives for ecologists, pathologists and agricultural scientists. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1:33-38.
43. Schieving F., Poorter H. Carbon gain in a multispecies canopy: the role of specific leaf area and phtosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency in the tragedy of the commons. New Phytol. 1999, 143:201-211.
44. Shinozaki K., Yoda K., Hozumi K., Kiro T. A quantitative analysis of plant form - the pipe model theory. i. Basic analysis. Jpn. J. Ecol. 1964, 14:97-105.
45. Sievanen R., Nikinmaa E., Nygren P., Ozier-Lafontaine H., Perttunen J., Hakula A. Components of functional structural tree models. Ann. For. Sci. 2000, 57:399-412.
46. Simioni G., Gignoux J., Le Roux X. Tree layer spatial structure can effect savanna production and water budget: results of a 3-D model. Ecology 2003, 84:1879-1894.
47. Stearns S.C. The Evolution of Life Histories 1992, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
48. Stanley K., Miikkulainen R. A taxonomy for artificial embryogeny. Artif. Life 2003, 9(2):93-130.
49. Taylor T. Artificial life techniques for generating controllers for physically modeled characters. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Games and Simulation (GAME-ON 2000) 2000.
50. Thornley J. Modelling shoot:root relations: the only way forward?. Ann. Bot. 1998, 81:165-171.
51. Yan H.-P., Kang M.Z., De Reffye P., Dingkuhn M. A dynamics, architectural plant model simulating resource-dependent growth. Ann. Bot. 2004, 93:591-602.