Relative error: An approach for in vivo characterization of electromagnetic tracking errors and confidence intervals

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6326 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 257-266

  Matinfar, Mohammad ^a   Parthasarathy, Vijay ^a   Chan, Raymond ^a   Jain, Ameet ^a  

^a PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE ERROR; CALIBRATION MEASUREMENTS; CALIBRATION PHANTOM; CLINICAL ENVIRONMENTS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ELECTROMAGNETIC TRACKING; EM FIELD; EM SENSORS; GEOMETRIC FEATURE; ILL POSED; IN-VIVO; INTERVENTIONAL; INVERSE SOLUTION; REAL-TIME INFORMATION; RELATIVE ERRORS; RELATIVE MEASUREMENT; SPARSE SET; STATISTICAL RELATIONSHIP;

AUGMENTED REALITY; CALIBRATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; INSTRUMENT ERRORS; MAGNETIC MATERIALS; MEDICAL IMAGING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

MEASUREMENT ERRORS;

EID: 78049443325     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15699-1_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Nafis, C., Jensen, V., Jako, R.V.: Method for evaluating compatibility of commercial electromagnetic (em) microsensor tracking systems with surgical and imaging tables. In: Proc. SPIE of Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-guided Procedures, and Modeling, vol. 9618, pp. 691-820 (2008)
2. Shen, E., Shechter, G., Kruecker, J., Stanton, D.: Effects of sensor orientation on ac electromagnetic tracking system accuracy in a ct scanner environment. In: Proc. SPIE of Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-guided Procedures and Modeling, vol. 9618, pp. 11-23 (2008)
3. Kindratenko, V.: A survey of electromagnetic position tracker calibration techniques. J. Virtual Reality 5, 169-182 (2000)
4. Wilson, E., Yaniv, Z., Zhang, H., Nafis, C., Shen, E., Shechter, G., Wiles, A., Peters, T., Lindisch, D., Cleary, K.: A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi-center study. In: Proc. SPIE of Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-guided Procedures and Modeling, vol. 6509, pp. 65092T1-65092T11 (2007)
5. Frantz, D., Wiles, A., Leis, S., Kirsch, S.: Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems. J. Physics in Medicine and Biology 48, 2241-2251 (2003)
6. Fischer, G.S., Taylor, R.: Electromagnetic tracker measurement error simulation and tool design. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3750, pp. 73-80. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
7. Matinfar, M., Narayanasamy, G., Guitierrez, L., Chan, R., Jain, A.: Absolute vs. relative error characterization of electromagnetic tracking accuracy. In: Proc. SPIE of Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-guided Procedures and Modeling, vol. 7625, pp. 762524-1-762524-9 (2010)
8. Birkfellner, W., Watzinger, F., Wanschitz, F., Enislidis, G., Truppe, M., Ewers, R., Bergmann, H.: Concepts and results in the development of a hybrid tracking system for cas. In: Wells, W.M., Colchester, A.C.F., Delp, S.L. (eds.) MICCAI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1496, pp. 343-351. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
9. Feuerstein, M., Reichl, T., Vogel, J., Traub, J., Navab, N.: New approaches to online estimation of electromagnetic tracking errors for laparoscopic ultrasonography. J. of Medical Physics 13, 311-323 (2008)