Analysis of deposition mechanism during ultrafiltration of glycerin-rich solutions

Desalination

Volumn 261, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 313-320

  Amin, Indok Nurul Hasyimah Mohd ^a   Mohammad, Abdul Wahab ^a   Markom, Mastura ^a   Peng, Leo Choe ^b   Hilal, Nidal ^c  

^a UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^c SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blocking mechanism; Flux decline; Fouling; Glycerin

Indexed keywords

CLARIFICATION; FATTY ACIDS; FOULING; PALMITIC ACID; ULTRAFILTRATION;

BLOCKING MECHANISMS; CAKE LAYER FORMATION; CONSTANT PRESSURES; DEPOSITION MECHANISM; FLUX DECLINE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; OLEOCHEMICAL INDUSTRY; POLYETHERSULPHONES;

GLYCEROL;

ADSORPTION; FATTY ACID; FOULING; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE; PH; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 78049442016     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. M.C. Burshe, S.B. Sawant, V.G. Pangarkar, Dehydration of glycerin-water mixtures by pervaporation, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 76 (1999) 209-214.
2. Fereidoon Shahidi, Bailey's Industrial Oil and Fat Products, sixth ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
3. D.B. Khairnar, V.G. Pangarkar, Dehydration of glycerin/water mixtures by pervaporation using homo and copolymer membranes, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 81 (2004) 505-510.
4. L. Jeromin, W. Johannisbauer, S. Blum, R. Sedelies, H. Moormann, B. Holfoth, J. Plachenka, Process for the purification of glycerol water, U.S. Patent. (1996) 5,527,974.
5. J. Lindau, A.-S. Jonsson, A. Bottino, Flux reduction of ultrafiltration membranes with different cut-off due to adsorption of a low-molecular-weight hydrophobic solutecorrelation between flux decline and pore size, J. Membr. Sci. 149 (1998) 11-20.
6. B. Blankert, B.H.L. Betlem, B. Roffel, Dynamic optimization of a dead-end filtration trajectory: blocking filtration laws, J. Membr. Sci. 285 (2006) 90-95.
7. G. Jonsson, P. Pradanos, A. Hernandez, Fouling phenomena in microporous membranes. Flux decline kinetics and structural modifications, J. Membr. Sci. 112 (1996) 171-183.
8. W.R. Bowen, J.I. Calvo, A. Hernandez, Steps of membrane blocking in flux decline during protein microfiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 101 (1995) 153-165.
9. F. Wang, V.V. Tarabara, Pore blockingmechanisms during early stages ofmembrane fouling by colloids, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 328 (2008) 464-469.
10. J. Hermia, Constant pressure blocking filtration law: application to power law non-Newtonian fluids, Trans. Ind. Chem. Eng. 60 (1982) 183.
11. M.C.V. Vela, S.A. Blanco, J.L. Garcia, E.B. Rodriguez, Analysis of membrane pore blocking models applied to the ultrafiltration of PEG, Sep. Purif. Tech. 62 (2008) 489-498.
12. S.-H. Lin, C.-L. Hung, R.-S. Juang, Applicability of the exponential time dependence of flux decline during dead-end ultrafiltration of binary protein solutions, Chem. Eng. J. 145 (2008) 211-217.
13. T.Mohammadi, M. Kazemimoghadam, M. Saadabadi, Modeling of membrane fouling and flux decline in reverse osmosis during separation of oil in water emulsions, Desalination 157 (2003) 369-375.
14. A.B. Koltuniewicz, R.W. Field, Process factors during removal of oil-in-water emulsions with cross-flow microfiltration, Desalination 105 (1996) 79-89.
15. J. Jacob, P. Pradanos, J.I. Calvo, A. Hernandez, G. Jonsson, Fouling kinetics and associated dynamics of structural modifications, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Eng. Aspects 138 (1998) 173-183.
16. E. Iritani, Y. Mukai, Y. Tanaka, T. Murase, Flux decline behavior in dead-end microfiltration of protein solutions, J. Membr. Sci. 103 (1995) 181-191.
17. C. Fersi, L. Gzara, M. Dhahbi, Flux decline study for textile wastewater treatment by membrane processes, Desalination 244 (2009) 321-332.
18. A.R. Costa, M.N. de Pinho, M. Elimelech, Mechanisms of colloidal natural organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006) 716-725.
19. N. Ochoa, C. Pagliero, J. Marchese, M. Mattea, Ultrafiltration of vegetable oils degumming by polymeric membranes, Sep. Purif. Tech. 22-23 (2001) 417-422.
20. S.S. Koseoglu, K.C. Rhee, E.W. Lusas, Bench-scale membrane degumming of crude vegetable oil: process optimization, J. Membr. Sci. 134 (1997) 101-108.
21. A. Grenier, M. Meireles, P. Aimar, P. Carvin, Analysing flux decline in dead-end filtration, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 86 (2008) 1281-1293.
22. I.N.H.M. Amin, A. W. Mohammad, M. Markom, C.P. Leo, N. Hilal, Flux decline study in ultrafiltration of glycerin-rich fatty acid solutions, J. Membr. Sci. 51 (2010) 75-86.
23. A.-S. Jönsson, J. Lindau, R. Wimmerstedt, J. Brinck, B. Jönsson, Influence of the concentration of a low-molecular organic solute on the flux reduction of a polyethersulphone ultrafiltration membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 135 (1997) 117-128.
24. J. Brinck, A.-S. Jonsson, B. Jonsson, J. Lindau, Influence of pHon the adsorptive fouling of ultrafiltration membranes by fatty acid, J. Membr. Sci. 164 (2000) 187-194.
25. P. Priyananda, V. Chen, Flux decline during ultrafiltration of protein-fatty acid mixtures, J. Membr. Sci. 273 (2006) 58-67.
26. C.-W. Li, Y.-S. Chen, Fouling of UF membrane by humic substance: effects of molecular weight and powder-activated carbon (PAC) pre-treatment, Desalination. 170 (2004) 59-67.
27. A.-S. Jonsson, B. Jonsson, The influence of nonionic and ionic surfactants on hydrophobic and hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 56 (1991) 49-76.