The evolution of the UK charity Statement of Recommended Practice: The influence of key stakeholders

European Management Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 455-466

  Hyndman, Noel ^a   McMahon, Danielle ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accounting; Charities; Reporting

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049439503     PISSN: 02632373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2010.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Accounting Standards Committee (ASC) The corporate report 1975, ASC, London.
2. ASC (1988) Accounting by charities, statement of recommended practice No. 2. ASC, London.
3. Accounting Standards Board (ASB) Statement of Principles for Financial Reporting 1999, ASB, London.
4. Ashford J.K. Charity accounts. Financial Reporting 1989-90. A Survey of UK Reporting Practice 1989, 23-48. ICAEW, London. L.C.L. Skerratt, D.J. Tonkin (Eds.).
5. Bird P., Morgan-Jones P. Financial Reporting by Charities 1981, ICAEW, London.
6. Bouckaert L., Vandenhove J. Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics 1998, 17:1073-1081.
7. Cabinet Office Private action, public benefit: A review of charities and the wider not-for-profit sector 2002, Strategy Unit Report, Cabinet Office, London.
8. Charity Commission Accounting by charities: Statement of recommended practice 1995, Charity Commission, London.
9. Charity Commission Accounting and reporting by charities: Statement of recommended practice 2000, Charity Commission, London.
10. Charity Commission Users on boards: Beneficiaries who become trustees 2000, Charity Commission, London.
11. Charity Commission RS8 transparency and accountability 2004, Charity Commission, London.
12. Charity Commission The hallmarks of an effective charity 2004, Charity Commission, London.
13. Charity Commission Accounting and reporting by charities: Statement of recommended practice 2005, Charity Commission, London.
14. Charity Commission. Operational guidance: Charity accounts and reports (2009a) available online at: Accessed 2.12.09. http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/supportingcharities/ogs/g015d001.asp.
15. Charity Commission. SORP 2005: Frequently asked questions (2009b) available online at: Accessed 21.01.09. http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/investigations/sorp/sorpfaq.asp#6.
16. Connolly C., Hyndman N. Charity accounting: An empirical analysis of the impact of recent changes. British Accounting Review 2000, 32:77-100.
17. Connolly C., Hyndman N. A comparative study on the impact of revised SORP 2 on British and Irish charities. Financial Accountability and Management 2001, 17:73-97.
18. Connolly C., Hyndman N. Performance reporting by UK charities: Approaches, difficulties and current practice 2003, ICAS, Edinburgh.
19. Connolly C., Hyndman N. Performance reporting: A comparative study of British and Irish charities. British Accounting Review 2004, 36:127-154.
20. Connolly C., Hyndman N., McMahon D. Charity reporting and accounting: Taking stock and future reform 2009, Charity Commission, London.
21. Donaldson D., Preston R.E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20:65-91.
22. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of financial accounting concepts No. 4: Objectives of financial reporting by non-business organisations 1980, FASB, Connecticut.
23. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach 1984, Pitman, Boston.
24. Friedman M.T., Mason D.S. A stakeholder approach to understanding economic development decision making: Public subsidies for professional sports facilities. Economic Development Quarterly 2004, 18:236-254.
25. Hillsdon A. Charity reporting: The way forward. Accountancy 2003, 132:32-34.
26. Hyndman N. Charity accounting: An empirical study of the information needs of contributors to UK fundraising charities. Financial Accountability and Management 1990, 6:295-307.
27. Hyndman N., McDonnell P. Governance and charities: An exploration of key themes and the development of a research agenda. Financial Accountability and Management 2009, 25:5-31.
28. Jones R., Pendlebury M. Public Sector Accounting 1996, (4th edn), Pitman, London.
29. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22:853-886.
30. National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) The UK civil society Almanac 2010, NCVO, London.