The hundredth psalm to the tune of "Green Sleeves": Digital approaches to Shakespeare's language of genre

Shakespeare Quarterly

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 357-390

  Hope, Jonathan ^a   Witmore, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049434301     PISSN: 00373222     EISSN: 15383555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/shq.2010.0002     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Open Source Shakespeare, http://www.opensourceshakespeare.org,
2. Jonathan Hope, "Ideas about Language in the Renaissance," in Shakespeare and Language: Reason, Eloquence, and Artifice in the Renaissance (London: Arden Shakespeare, 2010).
3. Stephen Ramsay"Toward an Algorithmic Criticism," Literary and Linguistic Computing 18 (2003): 167-74,
4. "Algorithmic Criticism," in The Blackwell Companion to Digital Literary Studies, ed. Susan Schreibman and Ray Siemens (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007), 477-91, http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companiondLS/ (accessed 2 March 2010).
5. Hugh Craig "Style, Statistics, and New Models of Authorship," Early Modern Literary Studies 15.1 (2009-10), http://purl.oclc.org/emls/15-1/ craistyl.htm.
6. Jacques derrida"Signature Event Context," in Limited Inc., trans. Samuel Weber (Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 1998), 1-23.
7. David Wills in Prosthesis (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1995), 135.
8. Hans Robert Jauss, Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, trans. Timothy Bahti (Minneapolis, U of Minnesota Pr, 1982);
9. Frances N. Teague, Shakespeare's Speaking Properties (Cranbury, NJ: Associated UP, 1991).
10. David Kaufer, Suguru Ishizaki, Brian Butler, and Jeff Collins, The Power of Words: Unveiling the Speaker and Writer's Hidden Craft (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004), x, xv.
11. "Description of DocuScope," http://betterwriting.net/projects/ fed01/dsc-fed01.html (accessed 3 March 2010).
12. Jonathan Hope and Michael Witmore, "The Very Large Textual Object: A Prosthetic Reading of Shakespeare," Early Modern Literary Studies 9.3 (January, 2004): 6.1-36, http://purl.oclc.org/emls/09-3/hopewhit.htm;
13. Michael Witmore and Jonathan Hope, "Shakespeare by the Numbers: On the Linguistic Texture of the Late Plays," in Early Modern Tragicomedy, ed. Subha Mukherji and Raphael Lyne (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2007), 133-53.
14. http://winedarksea.org/?p=816 and http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/ 46265.
15. Charlton Hinman, The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963);
16. Peter W. M. Blayney, The First Folio of Shakespeare (Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library Publications, 1991).
17. M. A. K. Halliday, Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2d ed. (London: A. Hodder, 1994).
18. Paula J. Schwanenflugel and Calvin R. White, "The Influence of Paragraph Information on the Processing of Upcoming Words," Reading Research Quarterly 26 (1991): 160-77.
19. Shakespeare(Comedy of Errors, 5.1/1842).
20. Susan Snyder, Shakespeare: A Wayward Journey (Newark: U of Delaware P, 2002), 29-45,
21. The Comic Matrix of Shakespeare's Tragedies (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1979), 70-74.
22. Barbara A. Mowat, The Dramaturgy of Shakespeare's Romances (Athens: U of Georgia P, 1976), 36, 69,
23. "'What's in a Name?' Tragicomedy, Romance, or Late Comedy," in A Companion to Shakespeare's Works, vol. 4, The Poems, Problem Comedies, Late Plays, ed. Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003), 129-49, esp. 134.
24. Alastair FowlerKinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1982).
25. Matthew L. Jockers, "Machine-Classifying Novels and Plays by Genre," 13 February 2009, http://www.stanford.edu/~mjockers/cgi-bin/drupal/ node/27 (accessed 26 July 2010).
26. Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor with John Jowett and William Montgomery, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997), 80-89.
27. Franco Moretti, Maps, Graphs, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary Theory (London: Verso Books, 2005);
28. Robin Valenza, "How Literature Becomes Knowledge: A Case Study," ELH 76 (2009): 215-45;
29. Brad Pasanek and D. Sculley, "Mining Millions of Metaphors," Literary and Linguistic Computing 23 (2008): 345-60.
30. J. F. Burroughs, Computation into Criticism: A Study of Jane Austen's Novels and an Experiment in Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987);
31. Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen, Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998).
32. James J. Gibson, "The Theory of Affordances," in Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, ed. Robert Shaw and John Bransford (Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Earlbaum, 1977), 67-82.
33. Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. Willard R. Trask (Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003), 556.
34. Michael Witmore, Culture of Accidents: Unexpected Knowledges in Early Modern England (Stanford: Stanford UP, 2001).
35. Patricia Parker"Othello and Hamlet: Dilation, Spying, and the 'Secret Place' of Woman," in Shakespeare Reread: The Texts in New Contexts, ed. Russ Mcdonald (Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1994), 105-46.
36. John Bender and Michael Marrinan, The Culture of Diagram (Stanford: Stanford UP, 2010).
37. Alfred Harbage, Annals of English Drama 975-1700, 3d ed., rev. S. Schoenbaum and Sylvia Stoler Wagonheim (London: Routledge, 1989).
38. Mueller"DATA: Digitally Assisted Text Analysis," http://literaryinformatics.northwestern.edu (accessed 19 August 2010).
39. John W. Tukey, Exploratory Data Analysis (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977).
40. H. Charles Romesburg, Cluster Analysis for Researchers ([Raleigh,] NC: Lulu.com, 2004), 134-35.
41. John Unsworth2005 "Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do Humanities Researchers Have in Common, and How Might Our Tools Reflect This?" at http://www3.isrl.illinois.edu/~unsworth//kings.5-00/primitives.html (accessed 28 July 2010).