Universal sum and product rules for random matrices

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Rogers, Tim ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049429654     PISSN: 00222488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3481569     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Pastur L. Mathematical Results in Statistical Mechanics 1998, 429. (World Scientific, Singapore, ), p.
2. Khorunzhy A. Pastur L. Commun. Math. Phys. 1993, 153:605. CMPHAY, 0010-3616, 10.1007/BF02096955, and.
3. Khorunzhy A. Khoruzhenko B. Pastur L. J. Math. Phys. 1996, 37:5033. JMAPAQ, 0022-2488, 10.1063/1.531589, and.
4. Pastur L. Theor. Math. Phys. 1972, 10:67. TMPHAH, 0040-5779, 10.1007/BF01035768.
5. Bai Z. Ann. Probab. 1997, 25:494. APBYAE, 0091-1798, 10.1214/aop/1024404298.
6. Pan G. Zhou W. J. Multivariate Analysis 2010, 11:645. 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.08.005, and.
7. Girko V. Theor. Probab. Appl. 1985, 29:694. TPRBAU, 0040-585X, 10.1137/1129095.
8. Gotze F. Tikhomirov A. and e-print arXiv:0709.3995.
9. Gotze F. Tikhomirov A. and e-print arXiv:0702.386.
10. Tao T. Vu V. Commun. Contemp. Math. 2008, 10:261. ZZZZZZ, 0219-1997, 10.1142/S0219199708002788, and.
11. Stephanov M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 76:4472. PRLTAO, 0031-9007, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4472.
12. Sometimes, for example, in Refs. 1718, this function, or its negative, is known as the resolvent.
13. For instance, an electrostatic potential introduced in Ref. 29 and used frequently thereafter.
14. Feinberg J. Zee A. Nucl. Phys. B 1997, 504:579. NUPBBO, 0550-3213, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00502-6, and.
15. Feinberg J. Zee A. Nucl. Phys. B 1997, 501:643. NUPBBO, 0550-3213, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00419-7, and.
16. Feinberg J. Scalettar R. Zee A. J. Math. Phys. 2001, 42:5718. JMAPAQ, 0022-2488, 10.1063/1.1412599, and.
17. Janik R. Nowak M. Papp G. Zahed I. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55:4100. PLEEE8, 1063-651X, 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.4100, and.
18. Janik R. Nowak M. Papp G. Zahed I. Nucl. Phys. B 1997, 501:603. NUPBBO, 0550-3213, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00418-5, and.
19. Jarosz A. Nowak M. and e-print arXiv:math-ph/0402057.
20. Jarosz A. Nowak M. J. Phys. A 2006, 39:10107. JPHAC5, 0305-4470, 10.1088/0305-4470/39/32/S12, and.
21. Goerlich A. Jarosz A. and e-print arXiv:math-ph/0408019.
22. Gudowska-Nowak E. Janik R. Jurkiewicz J. Nowak M. Nucl. Phys. B 2003, 670:479. NUPBBO, 0550-3213, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.08.012, and.
23. Burda Z. Janik R. Waclaw B. Phys. Rev. E 2010, 81:041132. PLEEE8, 1063-651X, 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.041132, and.
24. Khoruzhenko B. 2003, The Diablerets Winter School (unpublished notes available online at ).
25. Chafai D. Circular law for non-central random matrices. J. Theor. Probab. JTPREO, 0894-9840, (to be published).
26. 2001, This result was also found independently by Haagerup nearly a decade ago; it appears in handwritten notes distributed at MSRI in although the proof is substantially different.
27. In fact, the full jdpf of eigenvalues for matrices of this type was found recently in Ref. 35.
28. Forrester P. Mays A. and e-print arXiv:0910.2531.
29. Sommers H. Crisanti A. Sompolinsky H. Stein Y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 60:1895. PRLTAO, 0031-9007, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1895, and.
30. Khoruzhenko B. J. Phys. A 1996, 29:L165. JPHAC5, 0305-4470, 10.1088/0305-4470/29/7/003.
31. Notice that although this choice fails technical assumption (D3), the result still appears to hold.
32. Edelman A. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 1988, 9:543. SJMAEL, 0895-4798, 10.1137/0609045.
33. Carmona P. Hu Y. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 2006, 42:215. AIHPA2, 0365-320X, 10.1016/j.anihpb.2005.04.001, and.
34. Banded Toeplitz matrices are a good choice.
35. Krishnapur M. Ann. Probab. 2009, 37:314. APBYAE, 0091-1798, 10.1214/08-AOP404.