Residential equilibrium in a multifractal metropolitan area

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 681-704

  Cavailhès, Jean ^a   Frankhauser, Pierre ^b   Peeters, Dominique ^c   Thomas, Isabelle ^c  

^a Centre d'Economie et Sociologie Appliquees a l'Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

R12; R21

Indexed keywords

METROPOLITAN AREA; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPEN SPACE; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; URBAN ECONOMY; URBANIZATION;

FRANCE;

EID: 78049421093     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: 14320592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-009-0316-5     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anas A, Arnott R, Small K (1998) Urban spatial structure. J Econ Lit 36: 1426-1464.
2. Arlinghaus S, Arlinghaus W (1989) The fractal theory of central place geometry: a Diophantine analysis of fractal generators for arbitrary Löschian numbers. Geogr Anal 21: 103-121.
3. Bates LJ, Santerre RE (2001) The public demand of open space: the case of Connecticut communities. J Urban Econ 50: 97-111.
4. Bailly E (1999) Modèle de simulation fractale et croissance urbaine; étude de cas: Nice, Marseille, Gènes (Fractal simulation models and urban growth: case studies: Nice, Marseille, Genoa). PhD thesis, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis.
5. Batty M (1991) Generating urban forms from diffusive growth. Environ Plan A 23: 511-544.
6. Batty M (2005) Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models and fractals. MIT Press, Cambridge.
7. Batty M, Longley P (1994) Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. Academic, London.
8. Batty M, Xie Y (1996) Preliminary evidence for a theory of fractal cities. Environ Plan A 28: 1745-1762.
9. Bender A, Din A, Favarger P, Hoesli M, Laakso J (1997) An analysis of perceptions concerning the environmental quality of housing in Geneva. Urban Stud 34: 503-513.
10. Bolitzer B, Netusil NR (2000) The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. J Environ Manag 59: 185-193.
11. Brueckner JK, Thisse JF, Zenou Y (1999) Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. Eur Econ Rev 43: 91-107.
12. Burchfield M, Overman HG, Puga D, Turner MA (2006) The determinants of urban sprawl: a portrait from space. Q J Econ 121: 587-633.
13. Cavailhès J (2005) Le prix des attributs du logement. Economie et Statistique 381(382): 91-123.
14. Cavailhès J, Frankhauser P, Peeters D, Thomas I (2004a) Where Alonso meets Sierpinski: an urban economic model of a fractal metropolitan area. Environ Plan A 36(8): 1471-1498.
15. Cavailhès J, Peeters D, Sekeris E, Thisse JF (2004) The peri-urban city: why to live between the suburbs and the countryside?. Reg Sci Urban Econ 34: 681-703.
16. Chamberlin E (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
17. Cheshire P, Sheppard S (1995) On the price of land and the value of amenities. Economica 62: 247-267.
18. Cheshire P, Sheppard S (2002) The welfare economics of land use planning. J Urban Econ 52: 242-269.
19. Christaller W (1933) Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.
20. D'Aspremont C, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse JF (1979) On Hotteling's "stability in competition". Econometrica 47: 1045-1050.
21. D'Aspremont C, DosSantos Ferreira R, Gérard-Varet LA (1996) On the Dixit-Stiglitz model of monopolistic competition. Am Econ Rev 86: 623-629.
22. De Keersmaecker ML, Frankhauser P, Thomas I (2003) Using fractal dimensions to characterise intra-urban diversity: the example of Brussels. Geogr Anal 35: 310-328.
23. Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67: 297-308.
24. Frankhauser P (1994) La fractalité des structures urbaines. Anthropos, Paris.
25. Frankhauser P (1998) The fractal approach: a new tool for the spatial analysis of urban agglomerations. Population: an english selection, pp 205-240.
26. Frankhauser P (2008) Fractal geometry for measuring and modelling urban patterns. In: International workshop: the dynamics of complex urban systems, an interdisciplinary approach, Monte Verità (Ascona/Switzerland, November 2004). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 241-243.
27. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge.
28. Fujita M, Thisse JF (2002) Economy of agglomeration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Geoghegan J, Wainger LA, Bockstael NE (1997) Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecol Econ 23: 251-264.
30. Hobden DW, Laughton GE, Morgan KE (2004) Green space borders-a tangible benefit? Evidence from four neighbourhoods in Surrey, British Columbia, 1980-2001. Land Use Policy 21: 129-138.
31. INSEE (1990) Annuaire rétrospectif de la France, 1948-1988, p 658.
32. INSEE (2001) Les déplacements domicile-travail, Insee Première, 767, avril 2001, p 4.
33. Irwin EG (2002) The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Econ 78: 465-480.
34. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99: 483-499.
35. Lucas RE, Rossi-Hansberg E (2002) On the internal structure of cities. Econometrica 70: 1445-1476.
36. MacLennan M, Fotheringham S, Batty M, Longley P (1991) Fractal geometry and spatial phenomena: a bibliography, NCGIA report 91-1.
37. Marshall E (2004) Open-space amenities, interacting agents, and equilibrium landscape structure. Land Econ 80: 272-293.
38. Mooney S, Eisgruber LM (2001) The influence of riparian protection measures on residential property values: the case of the Oregon plan for salmon and watersheds. J Real Estate Finance Econ 22: 273-286.
39. Ogawa M, Fujita H (1982) Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. Reg Sci Urban Econ 12: 166-196.
40. Ottaviano GIP, Tabuchi T, Thisse JF (2002) Agglomeration and trade revisited. Int Econ Rev 43: 409-436.
41. Paterson RW, Boyle KJ (2002) Out of sight, out of mind? Using GIS to incorporate visibility in hedonic property value models. Land Econ 78: 417-425.
42. Roe B, Irwin EG, Morrow-Jones HA (2004) The effects of farmland, farmland preservation, and other neighborhood amenities on housing values and residential growth. Land Econ 80: 55-75.
43. Thomas I, Frankhauser P, De Keersmaecker ML (2007) Fractal dimension versus density of the built-up surfaces in the periphery of Brussels. Papers Reg Sci 86: 287-307.
44. Thomas I, Frankhauser P, Biernacki C (2008) The morphology of built-up landscapes in Wallonia (Belgium); a classification using fractal indices. Landsc Urban Plan 84: 99-115.
45. Thorsnes P (2002) The value of a suburban forest preserve: estimates from sales of vacant residential building lots. Land Econ 78: 426-441.
46. Turner MA (2005) Landscape preferences and patterns of residential development. J Urban Econ 57: 19-54.
47. Tyrvainen L, Miettinen A (2000) Property prices and urban forest amenities. J Environ Econ Manag 39: 205-223.
48. White R, Engelen G (1993) Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns. Environ Plan A 25: 1175-1199.
49. White R, Engelen G (1994) Cellular dynamics and GIS: modelling spatial complexity. Geogr Syst 1: 237-253.
50. Wu JJ, Plantinga AJ (2003) The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure. J Environ Econ Manag 46: 288-309.