Multimodal threat cueing in simulated combat vehicle

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 1287-1291

  Oskarsson, Per Anders ^a   Eriksson, Lars ^a   Lif, Patrik ^a   Lindahl, Björn ^a   Hedström, Johan ^a  

^a SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D AUDIO; COMBAT VEHICLES; HEAD UP DISPLAYS; LOCALIZATION ACCURACY; MAIN TASKS; MENTAL WORKLOAD; MULTI-MODAL; MULTIMODAL DISPLAYS; RADIO CALLS; REACTION TIME; SUBJECTIVE RATING; TASK DIFFICULTY;

ERGONOMICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

MILITARY VEHICLES;

EID: 78049402307     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Carlander, O., & Eriksson, L. (2006). Uni- and bimodal threat cueing with vibrotactile and 3D audio technologies in a combat vehicle. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 1552-1556). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
2. Carlander, O., Eriksson, L., & Oskarsson, P.-A. (2007). Handling uni- and multimodal threat cueing with simultaneous radio calls in a combat vehicle setting. In Proceedings of HCI International 2007 (pp. 293-302). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Gilson, R. D., Redden, E. S., & Elliott, L. R. (2007). Remote tactile displays for future soldiers. US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD. Report No. ARL-SR-0152.
4. McGrath, B. J., Estrada, A., Braithwaite, M. G., Raj, A. K., & Rupert, A. H. (2004). Tactile situation awareness system flight demonstration final report. Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Pensacola, FL. Report No. 2004- 10.
5. Redden, E. S. (2006). Findings of a multi-year investigation of tactile and multi-modal displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 1697-1700). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6. Santangelo, V., & Spence, C. (2007). Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1311-1321.
7. Sarter, N. (2007). Multiple-resource theory as a basis for multimodal interface design: Success stories, qualifications, and research needs. In A.F. Kramer, D.A. Wiegmann, & A. Kirlik (Eds.), Attention: From theoiy to practice (pp. 187-195). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Spence, C, & Driver, J. (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. van Erp, J. B. F., Eriksson, L., Levin, B., Carlander, O., Veltman, J. E., & Vos W. K. (2007). Tactile cueing effects on performance in simulated aerial combat with high acceleration. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine. 75(12), 1128-1134.
10. van Erp, J. B. F., van Veen, H. A. H. C, Jansen, C, & Dobbins, T. (2005). Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt. A CM Transaction on Applied Perception, 2(2), 1-12.
11. van Erp, J. B. F., Veltman, J. A., van Veen, H. A. H. C, & Oving, A. B. (2002). Tactile torso display as countermeasure to reduce night vision goggles induced drift. In Proceedings of NATO RTO HFM Panel Symposium on Spatial Disorientation in Military Vehicles: Causes, Consequences and Cures (pp. 49.1-49.8). Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: NATO RTO.
12. Veltman, J. A., Oving, A. B., & Bronkhorst, A. W. (2004). 3-D audio in the fighter cockpit improves task performance. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14(3), 239-256.
13. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159-177.