A new link between biodiversity science and policy

GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 183-186

  Görg, Christoph ^a   Neßhöver, Carsten ^a   Paulsch, Axel ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049385887     PISSN: 09405550     EISSN: 26255413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14512/gaia.19.3.7     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Babin, D., M. Thibon, A. Larigauderie, S. Guinard, C.Monfreda, S. Brels. 2008. Consultative process towards an IMoSEB-Strengthening the Science-Policy Interface on Biodiversity. Paris: Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD).
2. EC (European Commission). 2006. Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 - and beyond. Sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being. http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/com2006-0216en01-en.pdf (accessed July 25, 2010).
3. EPBRS (European Platform for Biodiversity Research Strategy). 2009. Concept note on a network of knowledge for biodiversity governance. www.epbrs.org/PDF/2009%2009%2010%20Concept%20note%20 on%20the%20network%20of%20knowledge-version%202-1.pdf(accessed July 25, 2010).
4. Görg, C. et al. 2007. International science-policy interfaces for biodiversity governance-Needs, challenges, experiences.Workshop Report. Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. www.ufz.de/data/leipzig-workshop- report-final25406.pdf (accessed July 25, 2010).
5. Henle, K. et al. 2010. Securing the Conservation of biodiversity across Administrative Levels and spatial, temporal, and Ecological Scales. Research needs and approaches of the SCALES project. GAIA 19/3: 187-193.
6. Heywood, V.H. (Ed.). 1995. The Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Koetz, T., P. Bridgewater, S. van den Hove, B. Siebenhüner. 2008. The role of the Subsidiary Body of Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity as science-policy interface. Environmental Science and Policy 11: 505-516.
8. Larigauderie, A., H.A. Mooney. 2010. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 9-14.
9. Loreau,M. et al. 2006. Diversity without representation. Nature 442: 245-246.
10. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being-Synthesis.Washington, D. C.: Island Press.
11. Menzel, S., J. Teng. 2010. Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science. Conservation Biology 24: 907-909.
12. Neßhöver, C., R. Müssner, K. Henle, I. Sousa Pinto. 2008. Linking biodiversity research and policy in Europe. Ambio 37: 138-141.
13. SCBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. Global Biodiver sity Outlook 3. Montreal: SCBD.
14. Scoles, R. J. et al. 2008. Towards a global biodiversity observation system. Science 321: 1044-1045.
15. Soberon, J. M., J. K. Sarukhan. 2010. A new mechanism for science-policy transfer and biodiversity governance. Environmental Conservation 36: 265-267.
16. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2009. Gap analysis for the purpose of facilitating the discussions on how to improve and strengthen the Science-Policy Interface on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. UNEP/IPBES/2/INF/1, www.ipbes.net/meetings/Documents/IPBES-2-1-INF-1%282%29.pdf (accessed July 25, 2010).
17. UNEP. 2010. Busan Outcome.UNEP/IPBES/3/L.2/Rev.1. www.ipbes.net/meetings/ Documents/ipbes3/K1030396-IPBES-3-L.2Rev1.pdf (accessed July 25, 2010).
18. Van den Hove, S., L. Chabason. 2009. The debate on an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). IDDRI Discussion Papers 1/2009.