Assessment of the user's dependability-relevant abilities for enhanced human-technology interaction

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 980-984

  Wagner, Achim ^a   Bartolein, Christian ^a   Jipp, Meike ^a   Badreddin, Essameddin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT; HUMAN-TECHNOLOGY INTERACTION; SIGMOID FUNCTION; SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS; TECHNICAL SYSTEMS;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 78049365189     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Badreddin, E. (1999). Safety and dependability of mechatronics systems. Lecture notes. Zürich: ETH.
2. Bastien, J. M, & Scpain, D. L. (1993). RT-0456 - Ergonomie criteria fort he evaluation of human-computer interfaces. Technical reportRT-0156, INRIA
3. Kaber, D. B. & Endsley, M. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 113-153.
4. Endsley, M. R. & Kaber, D. B. (1997). The use of level of automation as a means of alleviating out-of-the-loop-performance problems: A taxonomy and empirical analysis. In P. Seppala, T. Luopajarvi, C. H. Nygard, & M. Matilla (Eds.). 13th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (pp. 168-170). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occuptational Health.
5. Endsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situwation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42, 462-492.
6. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item-Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Hancock, P. A. & Chignell, M. H. (1988). Mental workload dynamics in adaptive interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 647-658.
8. Jäger, A. O. (1982). Mehrmodale Klassifikation von Intelligenzleistungen: Experimentell kontrollierte Weiterentwicklung eines deskriptiven Intelligenzstrukturmodells, Diagnostica, 28, 627-630.
9. Jipp, M., Pott, P. P., Wagner, A., Badreddin, E., & Wittmann, W.W. (2004). Skill acquisition process of a robot-based spine operation and a traditional one. International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Setubal, Portugal.
10. Jipp, M., Wagner, A. & Badreddin, E. (2008). Individual Ability-Based System Design of Dependable Human-Technology Interaction. IFAC World Congress.
11. Parasuraman, R., Galster, S., Squire, P., Furukawa, H., & Miller, C. (2005). A Flexible Delegation-Type Interface Enhances System Performance in Human Supervision of Multiple Robots: Empirical Studies with RoboFlag. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 35, 481-493.
12. Prinzel, L., Freeman, F., Scerbo, M., Mikulka, P., & Pope, A. (2003). Effects of a psychophysiological system for adaptive automation on performance, workload and event-related potential P300 component. Human Factors, 45, 601-614.
13. Sarter, N. B., Woods, D.D., & Billings, C.E. (1997). Automation Surprises. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors & Ergonomics (pp. 1926-1943). New York, NY: Wiley.
14. Shneiderman, B. (1983). Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages, IEEE Computer, 16, 57-69.
15. Vicente, K. J., Christoffersen, K, & Pereklita, A. (1995). Supporting Operator Problem Solving Through Ecological Interface Design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 25, 529-545.
16. Vicente, K. & Rasmussen, J. (1992). Ecological Interface Design: Theoretical Foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 589-606.