Evaluation systems, ethics, and development evaluation

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 540-548

  Thomas, Vinod ^a  

^a WORLD BANK GROUP   (United States)

Author keywords

development; ethics; incentives; quality; use

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049348533     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214010373648     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Evaluation Association-Fairhaven, MA. (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators, Author.
2. Development Assistance Committee. (2010). Development evaluation resources and systems: A study of network members. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
3. Development Assistance Committee. (n.d.). The Paris declaration on aid effectiveness and the Accra Agenda for action. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
4. Donecker, J., & Green, M. (1998). Impact assessment in multilateral development institutions. London, England: Department for International Development.
5. Grasso, P.G. (2003). What makes an evaluation useful? Reflections from experience in large organizations. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 507-514.
6. Independent Evaluation Group. (2005a). Country assistance evaluation retrospective. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
7. Independent Evaluation Group. (2005b). Maintaining momentum to 2015? An impact evaluation of interventions to improve maternal and child health and nutrition in Bangladesh. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
8. Independent Evaluation Group. (2007). World bank assistance to agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: An IEG review. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
9. Independent Evaluation Group. (2009). The World Bank Group's Response to the global crisis: Update on an ongoing IEG evaluation: Evaluation Brief 8. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
10. Independent Evaluation Group. (2010). WBG response to the Haiti earthquake: Evaluative lessons. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
11. International Development Association. (2007). Aid architecture: An overview of the main trends in official development assistance flows. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
12. Leeuw, F., & Vaessen, J. (2009). Impact evaluations and development: NONIE guidance on impact evaluation. Washington, DC: Network of Networks on Impact Evaluation.
13. Mayne, J. (2001). Assessing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16, 1-2.
14. Newman, J., Rawlings, L., & Gertler, P. (1994). Using randomized control designs in evaluating social sector programs in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 9, 181-202.
15. Operations Evaluation Department. (1997). Annual review of development effectiveness. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
16. Ravallian, M., Chen, S., & Sangraula, P. (2008). Dollar a day revisited. Policy Research Working Paper (No. 4620). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
17. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
18. United Nations Children's Fund. (2009). The state of the world's children: special edition. New York, NY: The United Nations.
19. World Bank. (n.d.). The development impact evaluation (DIME) initiative. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
20. World Bank. (2003). Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Lessons from Latin America. Policy Research Working Paper (No. 3119). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
21. World Bank. (2007). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.