Mercury emission from anthropogenic sources in Poland and their scenarios to the year 2020

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

Volumn 213, Issue 1-4, 2010, Pages 227-236

  Glodek, Anna ^a   Panasiuk, Damian ^a   Pacyna, Jozef M ^b,c  

^a NILU Polska   (Poland)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR AIR RESEARCH   (Norway)

^c GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Anthropogenic sources; Emission scenarios; Emissions; Mercury; Social benefits

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCES; EMISSION SCENARIO; EMISSIONS; MERCURY; SOCIAL BENEFITS;

EMISSION CONTROL;

MERCURY (METAL);

COAL; FUEL; MERCURY;

ABATEMENT COST; ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; EMISSION CONTROL; HEAVY METAL; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MERCURY (ELEMENT);

AIR POLLUTANT; AIR POLLUTION; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; COMBUSTION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HEAVY METAL REMOVAL; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METAL INDUSTRY; POLAND; PREDICTION; RECYCLING; RENEWABLE ENERGY; REVIEW; WASTE DISPOSAL;

POLAND;

EID: 78049344789     PISSN: 00496979     EISSN: 15732932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-010-0380-6     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. EC. (2001a). Best Available Techniques Reference Document on the Production of Iron and Steel, December 2001, European Commission, Available information [on line]: at: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/eippcb/doc/isp-bref-1201.pdf.
2. EC. (2001b). IPPC Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Cement and Lime Manufacturing Industries, December 2001, European Commission, Available information [on line]: at: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/eippcb/doc/clp-bref- 1201.pdf.
3. EC. (2001c). IPPC Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufacturing industry, December 2001, European Commission, Available information [on line]: at: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/eippcb/doc/cak-bref- 1201.pdf.
4. EC. (2005a). IPPC Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Large Combustion Plants. May 2005, European Commission, Available information [on line]: at: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/eippcb/doc/lcp-final-0505.pdf.
5. EC. (2005b). IPPC Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Waste Incineration. July 2005, European Commission, Available information [on line]: at: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/eippcb/doc/wi-bref-0705.pdf.
6. EMEP. (2007). Emission data officially reported to the EMEP Programme (European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme), Available information [on line]: at: http://www.ceip.at/emission-data-webdab/emissions-as-reported-by-parties/
7. Hlawiczka, S., Cenowski, M., & Fudala, J. (2006). Inwentaryzacja emisji niemetanowych lotnych zwiazkow organicznych i metali ciezkich za rok 2005. Katowice: IETU.
8. IPCC. (2007). Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group III Report "Mitigation of Climate Change 2007", Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2007.
9. Kindbom, K., & Munthe, J. (2007). Product-related emissions of Mercury to Air in the European Union. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
10. Laplace Conseil. (2007). Data based on figure from View on the Future of the Global Steel Industry, Laplace Conseil, 2006-2007, Available information [on line]: at: http://www.laplaceconseil.fr/LaplaceConseil/htdocs/admin/upload// File/New%20steel%20Paradigm.pdf
11. Maxson, P. (2006). Mercury flows and safe storage of surplus mercury. Report by Concorde East/West Sprl for DG Environment of the European Comission.
12. MG. (2007). Polityka energetyczna Polski do 2030 roku. Projekt wrzesien 2007. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Gospodarki.
13. EG Pacyna JM Pacyna F Steenhuisen S Wilson 2006a Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000 Atmospheric Environment 40 4048 4063 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlvFartLY%3D 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.041
14. EG Pacyna JM Pacyna J Fudala E Strzelecka-Jastrzab S Hlawiczka D Panasiuk 2006b Mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in Europe in 2000 and their scenarios until 2020 Science of the Total Environment 370 147 156 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XpvF2nsro%3D 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.06.023
15. EG Pacyna JM Pacyna J Fudala E Strzelecka-Jastrzab S Hlawiczka D Panasiuk S Nitter T Pregger H Pfeiffer R Friedrich 2007 Current and future emissions of selected heavy metals to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in Europe Atmospheric Environment 41 8557 8566 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlOjtLnJ 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.040
16. Pacyna, J. M., Munthe, J., Wilson, S., Maxson, P., Sundseth, K., Pacyna, E. G., et al. (2008a). Technical Background Report to the Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme/ UNEP Chemical Branch., Available information [on line]: at: http://www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/ Atmospheric-Emissions/Technical-background-report.pdf
17. Pacyna, J. M., Sundseth, K., Pacyna, E. G., Munthe, J., Belhaj, M., Astrom, S., et al. (2008b). Socio-economic costs of continuing the status-quo of mercury pollution. GLOCBA-SE Report Final Draft, Nordic Council of Ministers, TemaNord 2008:580, Copenhagen., Available information [on line]: at: http://www.norden.org/pub/miljo/miljo/sk/TN2008580.pdf
18. Pacyna, E. G., Pacyna, J. M., Sundseth, K., Munthe, J., Kindbom, K., Wilson, S., et al. (2009). Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmospheric Environment, Article in Press, Accepted Manuscript. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.009
19. Panasiuk, D., Pacyna, J. M., Glodek, A., Pia̧tek, R., Pacyna, E.G., Strzelecka-Jastrzab, E., et al. (2006). Scenarios for heavy metals, dioxins/furans and PCBs emissions to air in Europe for years 2010 and 2020, The EU DROPS project, FP6, No 022788, Deliverable No. D1.2, Katowice, Poland.
20. Rabl, A., & Spadaro, J. V. (2007). Global Health Impacts and Costs due to Mercury Emissions., Available information [on line]: at: http://www.arirabl.com/publications/myPapers/Hg-Costs-Spadaro+Rabl07.pdf
21. Rea, D., & Graham, L. (2004). Benefits of reducing Mercury in Saltwater ecosystems, A case study. US EPA, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds.
22. Scasny, M., Maca, V., & Melichar, J. (2008). Data set values for benefit valuation and costs-of-illness related to relevant health impacts. The EU DROPS project, FP6, No 022788, Deliverable No. D2.2. Kjeller: Norwegian Institute for Air Research.
23. Strzelecka-Jastrzab, E., Panasiuk, D., Pacyna, J. M., Pacyna, E. G., Fudala, J., Hlawiczka, S., et al. (2007). Emission projections for the years 2010 and 2020 and assessment of the emission reduction scenario implementation costs, The EU DROPS project, FP6, No 022788, Deliverable No. D1.3, Katowice, Poland.
24. Sundseth, K., Pacyna, J. M., & Panasiuk, D. (2008). Integrated system implementation. The EU DROPS project, FP6, No 022788, Deliverable No. D5.1. Kjeller: Norwegian Institute for Air Research. 2008.
25. UNEP. (2006). Summary of supply, trade and demand information on mercury; UNEP Chemical Branch, Geneva., Available information [on line]: at: http://www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/HgSupplyTradeDemandJM.pdf