Deposition and canopy exchange processes in central-German beech forests differing in tree species diversity

Plant and Soil

Volumn 336, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 405-420

  Talkner, Ulrike ^a,b   Krämer, Inga ^a,c   Hölscher, Dirk ^a   Beese, Friedrich O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b Northwest German Forest Research Station   (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR BALTIC SEA RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Broad leaved deciduous forest; Ion fluxes; Mixed species forest; Nutrient input; Shannon index; Throughfall

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE; CANOPY EXCHANGE; CATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DECIDUOUS FOREST; DIVERSITY INDEX; FOREST CANOPY; INTERCEPTION; ION EXCHANGE; LEACHING; PH; RAINFALL; SOIL NUTRIENT; SPECIES DIVERSITY; STAND STRUCTURE; STEMFLOW;

GERMANY;

ACER; ACER CAMPESTRE; ACER PLATANOIDES; ACER PSEUDOPLATANUS; CARPINUS BETULUS; FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA; FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR; MALVACEAE; TILIA CORDATA;

EID: 78049298587     PISSN: 0032079X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0491-2     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. André F, Jonard M, Ponette Q (2008) Spatial and temporal patterns of throughfall chemistry within a temperate mixed oak-beech stand. Sci Total Environ 397: 215-228.
2. Baumgarten M, von Teuffel K (2005) Nachhaltige Waldwirtschaft in Deutschland. In: von Teuffel K et al (eds) Waldumbau. Springer, Berlin, pp 1-10.
3. Beier C, Gundersen P, Rasmussen L (1992) A new method for estimation of dry deposition of particles based on throughfall measurements. Atmos Environ 26a: 1553-1559.
4. Berger TW, Untersteiner H, Schume H, Jost G (2008) Throughfall fluxes in a secondary spruce (Picea abies), a beech (Fagus sylvatica) and a mixed spruce-beech stand. For Ecol Manage 255: 605-618.
5. Boynton D (1954) Nutrition by foliar application. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 5: 31-54.
6. Bredemeier M (1988) Forest canopy transformation of atmospheric deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut 40: 121-138.
7. Cape JN, Leith ID (2002) The contribution of dry deposited ammonia and sulphur dioxide to the composition of precipitation from continuously open gauges. Atmos Environ 36: 5983-5992.
8. Chiwa M, Crossley A, Sheppard LJ, Sakugawa H, Cape JN (2004) Throughfall chemistry and canopy interactions in a Sitka spruce plantation sprayed with six different simulated polluted mist treatments. Environ Pollut 127: 57-64.
9. Croisé L, Ulrich E, Duplat P, Jaquet O (2005) Two independent methods for mapping bulk deposition in France. Atmos Environ 39: 3923-3941.
10. de Vries W et al (2001) Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe. Technical report 2000, UN/ECE, EC, Forest Intensive Monitoring Coordinate Institute, Heerenveen.
11. Draaijers GPJ, Erisman JW (1995) A canopy budget model to assess atmospheric deposition from throughfall measurements. Water Air Soil Pollut 85: 2253-2258.
12. Draaijers GPJ, van Ek R, Meijers R (1992) Research on the impact of forest stand structure on atmospheric deposition. Environ Pollut 75: 243-249.
13. Draaijers GPJ, Erisman JW, van Leeuwen NFM, Römer FG, te Winkel BH, Vermeulen AT, Wyers GP, Hansen K (1994) A comparison of methods to estimate canopy exchange at the Speulder Forest. National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven, Report No. 722108004.
14. Draaijers GPJ, Erisman JW, van Leeuwen NFM, Römer FG, te Winkel BH, Veltkamp AC, Vermeulen AT, Wyers GP (1997) The impact of canopy exchange on differences observed between atmospheric deposition and throughfall fluxes. Atmos Environ 31: 387-397.
15. Elling W, Heber U, Polle A, Beese F (2007) Schädigung von Waldökosystemen. Elsevier, München.
16. Erisman JW, Draaijers G (2003) Deposition to forests in Europe: Most important factors influencing dry deposition and models used for generalization. Environ Pollut 124: 379-388.
17. FAO (1998) FAO, ISRIC, ISSS World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Reports 84, Rome.
18. Finzi AC, Canham CD, van Breemen N (1998) Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: Species effects on pH and cations. Ecol Appl 8: 447-454.
19. Gaige E, Dail D, Hollinger D, Davidson E, Fernandez I, Sievering H, White A, Halteman W (2007) Changes in canopy processes following whole-forest canopy nitrogen fertilization of a mature spruce-hemlock forest. Ecosystems 10: 1133-1147.
20. Georgii HW (1986) Atmospheric pollutants in forest areas. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
21. Godt J (1986) Untersuchung von Prozessen im Kronenraum von Waldökosystemen. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme/Waldsterben, Band 17, Göttingen.
22. Guckland A, Jacob M, Flessa H, Thomas FM, Leuschner C (2009) Acidity, nutrient stocks and organic matter content in soils of a temperate deciduous forest with different abundance of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172: 500-511.
23. Hagen-Thorn A, Callesen I, Armolaitis K, Nihlgård B (2004) The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantations on former agricultural land. For Ecol Manage 195: 373-384.
24. Jacob M (2009) Productivity and nutrient relations of trees in deciduous forests with contrasting tree species diversity. University of Goettingen, Dissertation.
25. Jacob M, Leuschner C, Thomas FM (2010) Productivity of temperate broad-leaved forest stands differing in tree species diversity. Ann For Sci 67: 503.
26. Johnson DW, Lindberg SE (1992) Atmospheric deposition and forest nutrient cycling. Ecol Stud 91, Springer, New York.
27. Knoke T, Stimm B, Ammer C, Moog M (2005) Mixed forests reconsidered: A forest economics contribution on an ecological concept. For Ecol Manage 213: 102-116.
28. Krämer I, Hölscher D (2009) Rainfall partitioning along a tree diversity gradient in a deciduous old-growth forest in Central Germany. Ecohydrol 2: 102-114.
29. Krauß HH, Heinsdorf D (2005) Ernährungsstufen für wichtige Wirtschaftsbaumarten. Beitr Forstwirtsch Landsch ökol 39: 172-179.
30. Leuschner C, Jungkunst HF, Fleck S (2009) Functional role of forest diversity: pros and cons of synthetic stands and across-site comparisons in established forests. Basic Appl Ecol 10: 1-9.
31. Lindberg SE, Lovett GM, Richter DD, Johnson DW (1986) Atmospheric deposition and canopy interactions of major ions in a forest. Science 231: 141-145.
32. Lovett GM, Lindberg SE (1984) Dry deposition and canopy exchange in a mixed oak forest as determined by analysis of throughfall. J Appl Ecol 21: 1013-1027.
33. Lovett GM, Nolan SS, Driscoll CT, Fahey TJ (1996) Factors regulating throughfall flux in a New Hampshire forested landscape. Can J For Res 26: 2134-2144.
34. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
35. Matzner E (1986) Deposition/Canopy-interactions in two forest ecosystems of northwest Germany. In: Georgii HW (ed) Atmospheric Pollutants in Forest Areas. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 247-262.
36. Matzner E, Meiwes KJ (1994) Atmospheric pollutants-Long-term development of element fluxes with bulk precipitation and throughfall in two German forests. J Environ Qual 23: 162-166.
37. Mayer R (1983) Interaction of forest canopies with atmospheric constituents: Aluminum and heavy metals. In: Ulrich B, Pankrath J (eds) Effects of accumulation of air pollutants in forest ecosystems. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 47-55.
38. Meesenburg H, Meiwes KJ, Rademacher P (1995) Long term trends in atmospheric deposition and seepage output in northwest German forest ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut 85: 611-616.
39. Meesenburg H, Eichhorn J, Meiwes KJ (2009) Atmospheric deposition and canopy interaction. In: Brumme R, Khanna PK (eds) Functioning and management of European beech ecosystems. Springer, New York.
40. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621-626.
41. Neirynck J, Mirtcheva S, Sioen G, Lust N (2000) Impact of Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Fraxinus excelsior L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. on earthworm biomass and physico-chemical properties of a loamy topsoil. For Ecol Manage 133: 275-286.
42. Nordén U (1991) Acid deposition and throughfall fluxes of elements as related to tree species in deciduous forests of South Sweden. Water Air Soil Pollut 60: 209-230.
43. Nordén U (1994) Influence of tree species on acidification and mineral pools in deciduous forest soils of south Sweden. Water Air Soil Pollut 76: 363-381.
44. Parker GG (1983) Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. Adv Ecol Res 13: 57-133.
45. Potter CS, Ragsdale HL, Swank WT (1991) Atmospheric deposition and foliar leaching in a regenerating southern appalachian forest canopy. J Ecol 79: 97-115.
46. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
47. Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P, Hobbie SE, Eissenstat DM, Chorover J, Chadwick OA, Hale CM, Tjoelker MG (2005) Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: A common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecol Lett 8: 811-818.
48. Roelofs JGM, Kempers AJ, Houdijk ALFM, Jansen J (1985) The effect of air-borne ammonium sulphate on Pinus nigra var. maritima in the Netherlands. Plant Soil 84: 45-56.
49. Schmidt I, Leuschner C, Mölder A, Schmidt W (2009) Structure and composition of the seed bank in monospecific and tree species-rich temperate broad-leaved forests. For Ecol Manage 257: 695-702.
50. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
51. Stachurski A, Zimka JR (2002) Atmospheric deposition and ionic interactions within a beech canopy in the Karkonosze Mountains. Environ Pollut 118: 75-87.
52. Staelens J, de Schrijver A, Verheyen K (2007) Seasonal variation in throughfall and stemflow chemistry beneath a European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) tree in relation to canopy phenology. Can J For Res 37: 1359-1372.
53. Staelens J, Houle D, de Schrijver A, Neirynck J, Verheyen K (2008) Calculating dry deposition and canopy exchange with the canopy budget model: Review of assumptions and application to two deciduous forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 191: 149-169.
54. Swank WT (1984) Atmospheric contributions to forest nutrient cycling. Water Resour Bull 20: 313-321.
55. Talkner U, Jansen M, Beese FO (2009) Soil phosphorus status and turnover in central-European beech forest ecosystems with differing tree species diversity. Eur J Soil Sci 60: 338-346.
56. Tyler G (1976) Soil factors controlling metal ion absorption in the wood anemone Anemone nemorosa. Oikos 27: 71-80.
57. 10 aus dem Luftmessnetz des Umweltbundesamtes. UBA, Dessau-Roßlau. http://www. umweltbundesamt. de/luft/luftmessnetze/mb2006/mb0606. pdf, last visited: 02. 03. 2010.
58. 2, Alkali and earth alkali cations and chloride. In: Pankrath J (ed) B Ulrich. Effects of accumulation of air pollutants in forest ecosystems. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 33-45.
59. Ulrich B (1983b) A concept of forest ecosystem stability and of acid deposition as driving force for destabilization. In: Ulrich B, Pankrath J (eds) Effects of accumulation of air pollutants in forest ecosystems. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 1-29.
60. Ulrich B (1994) Nutrient and acid-base budget of central European forest ecosystems. In: Godbold DL, Hüttermann A (eds) Effects of acid rain on forest processes. Wiley-Liss, pp 1-50.
61. Ulrich B, Pankrath J (1983) Effects of accumulation of air pollutants in forest ecosystems. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
62. Ulrich KU, Paul L, Meybohm A (2006) Response of drinking-water reservoir ecosystems to decreased acidic atmospheric deposition in SE Germany: Trends of chemical reversal. Environ Pollut 141: 42-53.
63. Wulf M (2003) Preference of plant species for woodlands with differing habitat continuities. Flora 198: 444-460.