Two prognostic indicators of the publication rate of clinical studies were available during ethical review

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 63, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1342-1350

  De Jong, Jean Philippe ^a   Ter Riet, Gerben ^a   Willems, Dick Ludolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clinical protocols; Follow up studies; Publishing; Research ethics committees; Survival analysis; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTED HAZARD RATIO; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; MEDICAL ETHICS; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOM SAMPLE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SAMPLE SIZE; SURVIVAL;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PUBLICATION BIAS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 78049295959     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. J. Sugarman, N.E. Kass, S.N. Goodman, P. Perentesis, P. Fernandes, and R.R. Faden What patients say about medical research IRB 20 1998 1 7
2. J. Pich, X. Carne, J.A. Arnaiz, B. Gomez, A. Trilla, and J. Rodes Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results Lancet 361 2003 1015 1016
3. P. Sune-Martin, and J.B. Montoro-Ronsano Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results Lancet 361 2003 2245 2246
4. E. Decullier, V. Lheritier, and F. Chapuis Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study BMJ 331 2005 19
5. K. Dickersin, Y.I. Min, and C.L. Meinert Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards JAMA 267 1992 374 378
6. R. Hall, C. de Antueno, and A. Webber Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board Can J Anaesth 54 2007 380 388
7. P.J. Easterbrook, and D.R. Matthews Fate of research studies J R Soc Med 85 1992 71 76
8. A.T. Turer, K.W. Mahaffey, K.L. Compton, R.M. Califf, and K.A. Schulman Publication or presentation of results from multicenter clinical trials: evidence from an academic medical center Am Heart J 153 2007 674 680
9. E. von Elm, A. Rollin, A. Blumle, K. Huwiler, M. Witschi, and M. Egger Publication and non-publication of clinical trials: longitudinal study of applications submitted to a research ethics committee Swiss Med Wkly 138 2008 197 203
10. I. Chalmers Underreporting research is scientific misconduct JAMA 263 1990 1405 1408
11. J. Savulescu, I. Chalmers, and J. Blunt Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability BMJ 313 1996 1390 1393
12. World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. October 2008. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html. Accessed April 6, 2010.
13. J. Pearn Publication: an ethical imperative BMJ 310 1995 1313 1315
14. H. Mann Research ethics committees and public dissemination of clinical trial results Lancet 360 2002 406 408
15. J. McCormack, P. Loewen, and P. Jewesson Dissemination of results needs to be tracked as well as the funding is BMJ 331 2005 456
16. J.M. Stern, and R.J. Simes Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects BMJ 315 1997 640 645
17. P.J. Easterbrook, J.A. Berlin, R. Gopalan, and D.R. Matthews Publication bias in clinical research Lancet 337 1991 867 872
18. Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek Jaarverslag 2006; Onderzoek met proefpersonen 2002-2006 Dutch Central Committee for Research on Human Subjects. Annual report 2006; Research on human subjects 2002-2006 2007 Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek The Hague, The Netherlands In Dutch
19. K.J. Rothman, S. Greenland, and T.L. Lash Modern epidemiology 3rd edition 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia, PA
20. M.J. Bradburn, T.G. Clark, S.B. Love, and D.G. Altman Survival analysis part II: multivariate data analysis - an introduction to concepts and methods Br J Cancer 89 2003 431 436
21. K. Dickersin, and Y.I. Min NIH clinical trials and publication bias Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993 Doc. No. 50
22. E.J. Weber, M.L. Callaham, R.L. Wears, C. Barton, and G. Young Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish JAMA 280 1998 257 259
23. K. Dickersin, S. Chan, T.C. Chalmers, H.S. Sacks, and H. Smith Jr. Publication bias and clinical trials Control Clin Trials 8 1987 343 353
24. K. Dickersin, and D. Rennie Registering clinical trials JAMA 290 2003 516 523