The argument interchange format

Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 383-402

  Rahwan, Iyad ^a,b   Reed, Chris ^c  

^a THE BRITISH UNIVERSITY IN DUBAI   (United Arab Emirates)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049289871     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_19     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
2. D. Brickley and R. V. Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation REC-rdf-schema-20040210, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), February 2004.
3. S. Buckingham Shum. Cohere: TowardsWeb 2.0 argumentation. In P. Besnard, S. Doutre, and A. Hunter, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pages 97-108. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008.
4. S. Buckingham Shum, E. Motta, and J. Domingue. ScholOnto: An ontology-based digital library server for research documents and discourse. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 3(3):237-248, 2000.
5. S. Buckingham Shum, V. Uren, G. Li, B. Sereno, and C.Mancini. Modelling naturalistic argumentation in research literatures: Representation and interaction design issues. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Computational Modelling of Naturalistic Argumentation, 22(1):17-47, 2007. (Pubitemid 46120553)
6. C. I. Chesñevar, J. McGinnis, S. Modgil, I. Rahwan, C. Reed, G. Simari, M. South, G. Vreeswijk, and S. Willmott. Towards an argument interchange format. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 21(4):293-316, 2007. (Pubitemid 44877967)
7. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-358, 1995.
8. L. Emmet and G. Cleland. Graphical notations, narratives and persuasion: a pliant systems approach to hypertext tool design. In HYPERTEXT 2002, Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, June 11-15, 2002, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, pages 55-64, New York, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
9. T. F. Gordon, H. Prakken, and D. Walton. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10-15):875-896, 2007. (Pubitemid 47285070)
10. P. A. Kirschner, S. J. B. Schum, and C. S. Carr, editors. Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer Verlag, London, 2003.
11. P.-A. Matt, F. Toni, T. Stournaras, and D. Dimitrelos. Argumentation-based agents for eprocurement. In AAMAS '08, pages 71-74, 2008.
12. S. Modgil and J. McGinnis. Towards characterising argumentation based dialogue in the argument interchange format. In I. Rahwan and P. Moraitis, editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS), volume 5384 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 2008. to appear.
13. M. F. Moens, E. Boiy, R. M. Palau, and C. Reed. Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on AI & Law (ICAIL-2007), 2007.
14. I. Rahwan. Mass argumentation and the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics, 6(1):29-37, 2008.
15. I. Rahwan and B. Banihashemi. Arguments in OWL: A progress report. In P. Besnard, S. Doutre, and A. Hunter, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pages 297-310, Amsterdam, Nethrelands, 2008. IOS Press.
16. I. Rahwan, F. Zablith, and C. Reed. Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10-15):897-921, 2007. (Pubitemid 47285078)
17. A. Ravenscroft. Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6):453-465, 2007.
18. C. Reed and G. Rowe. Araucaria: Software for argument analysis. International Journal of AI Tools, 14(3-4):961-980, 2004.
19. C. Reed, S. Wells, J. Devereux, and G. Rowe. AIF+: Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Format. In P. Besnard, S. Doutre, and A. Hunter, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pages 311-323. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008.
20. M. South, G. Vreeswijk, and J. Fox. Dungine: A Java Dung reasoner. In P. Besnard, S. Doutre, and A. Hunter, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pages 360-368, Amsterdam, Nethrelands, 2008. IOS Press.
21. T. van Gelder. The rationale for rationale. Law, Probability and Risk, 6(1-4):23-42, 2007.
22. D.Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, 1996.
23. D. Walton. Legal Argumentation and Evidence. Penn State Press, University Park, PA, 2002.
24. T. Yuan, J. Schulze, J. D. C., and Reed. Towards an arguing agents competition: Building on Argumento. In Working Notes of the 8th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA-2008), 2008.