A comparative study on performance of Malaysian porous asphalt mixes incorporating conventional and modified binders

Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 20, 2010, Pages 2403-2410

  Hamzah, Meor Othman ^a   Hasan, M R M ^a   Che Wan, C N ^b   Abdullah, N H ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING   (Malaysia)

^b Polytechnic Tuanku Sultanah Bahiyah   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Abrasion loss; Aggregate grading; Air voids; Indirect tensile strength; Permeability

Indexed keywords

ABRASION; AGGREGATES; ASPHALT; BINDERS; BINS; BITUMINOUS MATERIALS; GRADING; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; SPECIFICATIONS; TRIBOLOGY;

ABRASION LOSS; AGGREGATE GRADATIONS; AGGREGATE GRADING; AIR VOIDS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; CYLINDRICAL SPECIMENS; INDIRECT TENSILE STRENGTH; PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT;

TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 78049269075     PISSN: 18125654     EISSN: 18125662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2010.2403.2410     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alvarez, A.E., A.E. Martin, C.K. Estakhri, J.W. Button, C.J. Glover and S.H. Jung, 2006. Synthesis of current practice on the design, construction and maintenance of porous friction courses. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A and M University System College Station, Texas. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-5262-l. pdf.
2. Asphalt Institute, 2007. The Asphalt Handbook. 7th Edn., Asphalt Institute, USA., ISBN: 978-1-934154-27-4.
3. ASTM, 2000. ASTM D2041: Standard test method for theoretical maximum specific gravity and density of bituminous paving mixtures. Annual Books of ASTM Standard, West Conshohocken, PA. http: //www. astm. org/ Standards/D2041. htm.
4. ASTM, 2005. ASTM D4123: Standard test method for indirect tension test for resilient modulus of bituminous paving mixtures. Annual Books of ASTM Standard, Vol. 04.03, West Conshohocken, PA.
5. Colonna, P., 1996. Design and performance of porous asphalt in the puglia region of Southern Italy. Proceedings of the Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, (EEC'96), Asphalt Academy, pp: 1-12.
6. Cooley, Jr. L.A., E.R. Brown and D.E. Watson, 2000. Evaluation of OGFC mixtures containing cellulose fibers. Transportation Research Record 1723, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. http://www.interfibe.com/pdf/NC AT Study. pdf.
7. Faghri, M. and M.H. Sadd, 2002. Performance improvement of open-graded asphalt mixes. Transportation Centre, University of Rhode Island, URITC ProjectNo. 536144. http://ohio.sierraclub.org/ miami/images/files/PerformancelmprovementofOpe nGradedAsphaltMixes.pdf.
8. Hamzah, M.O., M.M. Samat, K.H. Joon and R. Muniandy, 2004. Modification of aggregate grading for porous asphalt. Proceedings of the 3rd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, (EEC'04), Vienna, pp: 250-261.
9. Hamzah, M.O., M.R.M. Hasan, M.R. Ismail and Z. Shahadan, 2010. Effects of temperature on abrasion loss of porous and dense asphalt mixes. Eur. J. Sci. Res., 40: 589-597.
10. Herrington, P.R., S. Reilly and S. Cook, 2005. Porous Asphalt Durability Test. Transfund Opus International Consultants Ltd., Lower Hutt, New Zealand, ISBN: 0-478-25376-1.
11. Huber, G., 2000. Performance Survey on Open-Graded Friction Course Mixes. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., ISBN: 0-309-06863-0.
12. JKR., 2008. Standard specification for road works. (Section 4: Flexible Pavement), Public Works Department, Ministry of Works Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
13. Kok, B.V. and M. Yilmaz, 2009. The effects of using lime and styrene-butadiene-styrene on moisture sensitivity resistance of hot mix asphalt. Construct. Build. Materials, 23: 1999-2006.
14. Mallick, R.B., P.S. Kandhal, L.A. Jr. Cooley and D.E. Watson, 2000. Design, construction, and performance of new generation open-graded friction courses. NCAT Report No. 2000-01. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University. http://ntl.bts.gOv/lib/8000/8800/8813/rep00-01.pdf.
15. Mogawer, W.S., R.B. Mallick, M.R. Teto and W.C. Crockford, 2002. Evaluation of permeability of superpave mixes. Technical Report No. NETC 00-2, The New England Transportation Consortium, Connecticut, http://docs.trb.org/00932402.pdf.
16. Moore, L.M., R.G. Hicks and D.F. Rogge, 2001. Design, construction and maintanance guidelines for porous asphalt pavements. Transportat. Res. Rec.: J. Transportat. Res. Board, 1778: 91-99.
17. Nielsen, C.B., E. Nielsen, J.B. Andersen and J. Raaberg, 2004. Development of durable porous apshalt mixes from laboratoiy experiments. Proceedings of the 3rd Eutoasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, Vienna.
18. Pagotto, C., M. LegretandP. le Cloirec, 2000. Comparison of the hydraulic bahaviour and the quality of highway runoff water according to the type of pavement. Water Res., 34: 4446-4454.
19. Pouhkakos, L.D., S. Takahashi and M.N. Parti, 2004. A comparison of Swiss and Japanese porous asphalt through various mechanical tests. Conference Paper Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC) 2004, Ascona.
20. Roseen, R., T. Ballestero and J. Houle, 2007. University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center (UNHSC) annual report. University of New Hampshire, Durham. http://ciceet.unh.edu/unh_stormwater_report_2007 /SC_Report_2007. pdf.
21. Suresha, S.N., V. George and A.U. Ravi Shankar, 2009. Effect of aggregate gradations on properties of porous friction course mixes. Materials Structures, 43: 789-801.
22. Watson, D.E., K.A. Moore, K. Williams and L.A. Jr. Cooley, 2003. Refinement of new-generation open- graded friction course mix design. Transportat. Res. Rec., 1832: 78-85.
23. Watson, D.E., L.A. Jr. Cooley, K.R. Moore and K. William, 2004. Laboratory performance testing of open graded friction course mixtures. Transportat. Res. Rec.: J. Transportat. Res. Broad, 1891: 40-47.
24. Yildrim, Y., J. Ideker and D. Hazlett, 2006. Evaluation of viscosity values for mixing and compaction temperatures. J. Materials Civil Eng., 18: 545-553.