Movement duration does not affect automatic online control

Human Movement Science

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 871-881

  Cressman, Erin K ^a   Cameron, Brendan D ^b   Lam, Melanie Y ^b   Franks, Ian M ^b   Chua, Romeo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action; Automatic guidance Movement time; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JUMPING; LIMB MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; AUTOMATION; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049268915     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bard C., Turrell Y., Fleury M., Teasdale N., Lamarre Y., Martin O. Deafferentation and pointing with visual double-step perturbations. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 125:410-416.
2. Blouin J., Teasdale N., Bard C., Fleury M. Control of rapid arm movements when target position is altered during saccadic suppression. Journal of Motor Behavior 1995, 27:114-122.
3. Bridgeman B., Lewis S., Heit G., Nagle M. Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979, 5:692-700.
4. Cameron B.D., Cressman E.K., Franks I.M., Chua R. Cognitive constraint on the 'automatic pilot' for the hand: Movement intention influences the hand's susceptibility to involuntary online corrections. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18:646-652.
5. Castiello U., Bennett K., Chambers H. Reach to grasp: The size to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 120:31-40.
6. Chua R., Enns J.T. What the hand can't tell the eye: Illusion of space constancy during accurate pointing. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 162:109-114.
7. Cressman E.K., Franks I.M., Enns J.T., Chua R. No automatic pilot for visually guided aiming based on colour. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 171:174-183.
8. Day B.L., Lyon I.N. Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 130:159-168.
9. Desmurget M., Epstein C.M., Turner R.S., Prablanc C., Alexander G.E., Grafton S.T. Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:563-567.
10. Desmurget M., Prablanc C. Postural control of three-dimensional prehension movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 1997, 77:452-464.
11. Fecteau J.F., Chua R., Franks I.M., Enns J.T. Visual awareness and the on-line modification of action. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 55:104-110.
12. Fisk J.D., Goodale M.A. The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space. Experimental Brain Research 1985, 60:159-178.
13. Goodale M.A., Pélisson D., Prablanc C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 1986, 320:748-750.
14. Gritsenko V., Yakovenko S., Kalaska J.F. Integration of predictive and feedforward and sensory feedback signals for online control of visually guided movement. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102:914-930.
15. Johnson J., van Beers R.J., Haggard P. Action and awareness in pointing tasks. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 146:451-459.
16. Komilis E., Pélisson D., Prablanc C. Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli. Journal of Motor Behavior 1993, 25:299-308.
17. Magescas F., Urquizar C., Prablanc C. Two modes of error processing in reaching. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 193:337-350.
18. Paulignan Y., MacKenzie C., Marteniuk R., Jeannerod M. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements I. The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research 1991, 83:502-512.
19. Pélisson D., Prablanc C., Goodale M.A., Jeannerod M. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb II: Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Experimental Brain Research 1986, 62:303-311.
20. Pisella L., Gréa H., Tilikete C., Vighetto A., Desmurget M., Rode G., et al. An "automatic pilot" for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: Toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:729-736.
21. Prablanc C., Echallier J.F., Komilis E., Jeannerod M. Optimal response of eye and motor systems in pointing at a visual target. Biological Cybernetics 1979, 35:113-124.
22. Prablanc C., Martin O. Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. Journal of Neurophysiology 1992, 67:455-469.
23. Prablanc C., Pélisson D., Goodale M.A. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand. Experimental Brain Research 1986, 62:293-302.
24. Rosetti Y., Pisella L. Several "vision for action" systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and performance XIX 2002, Oxford University. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
25. Soechting J.F., Lacquaniti F. Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology 1983, 49:548-564.
26. Streimer C.L., Yukovsky J., Goodale M.A. Can intention override the "automatic pilot" ?. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202:623-632.