Contrast-enhanced MRI and PET-CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected local recurrence of rectal carcinoma;RM e PET-TC nella valutazione di pazienti con sospetta recidiva locale di carcinoma rettale

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 906-919

  Fiocchi, F ^a   Iotti, V ^a   Ligabue, G ^a   Pecchi, A ^a   Luppi, G ^a   Bagni, B ^a   Rivasi, F ^a   Torricelli, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Contrastenhanced MRI; Local recurrence; PET CT; Rectal cancer; Risk adapted follow up

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RECTUM TUMOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

AGED; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 78049262447     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0558-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. O. Schaefer M. Langer 2007 Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT Eur Radiol 17 2044 2054 10.1007/s00330-007-0613-2 17404742 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svgtFSrsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47097462)
2. P. Torricelli A. Pecchi G. Luppi, et al. 2003 Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer Abdom Imaging 28 19 27 10.1007/s00261-001-0127-3 12483379 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38jitFCgsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36460656)
3. G.B. Secco R. Fardelli D. Gianquinto, et al. 2002 Efficacy and cost of riskadapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial EJSO 28 418 423 10.1053/ejso.2001.1250 12099653
4. A.G. Renahan M. Egger M.P. Saunders, et al. 2002 Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials BMJ 324 813 10.1136/bmj.324.7341. 813
5. A. Figueredo R.B. Rumble J. Maroun, et al. 2003 Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: A practice guideline BMC Cancer 3 26 10.1186/1471-2407-3-26 14529575 (Pubitemid 38851323)
6. Jeffery GM, Hickey BE, Hider P (2002) Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD002200. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub2
7. A.G. Renahan M. Egger M.P. Saunders, et al. 2005 Mechanism of improved survival from intensive follow-up in colorectal cancer: a hypotesis Br J Cancer 92 430 433
8. E. Even-Sapir Y. Parag H. Lerman, et al. 2004 Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection Radiology 232 815 822 10.1148/radiol.2323031065 15273334 (Pubitemid 39100268)
9. M. Bellomi S. Rizzo L.L. Travaini, et al. 2007 Role of multidetector CT and FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of local and distant recurrence of resected rectal cancer Radiol Med 112 681 690 10.1007/s11547-007-0172-2 17657420 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svovFWitw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47228680)
10. D.C. Desai E.E. Zervos M.W. Arnold, et al. 2003 Positron emission tomography affects surgical management in recurrent colorectal cancer patients Ann Surg Oncol 10 59 64 10.1245/ASO.2003.05.006 12513962
11. W.A. Weber R. Figlin 2007 Monitoring cancer treatment with PETCT: does it make a difference? J Nucl Med 48 36S 44S 10.2967/jnumed.107.042911 17204719 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXitVanu7c%3D (Pubitemid 47572703)
12. C.E. Schmidt B. Bestmann T. Kuechler, et al. 2005 Prospective evaluation of quality of life of patients receiving either abdominoperineal resection or sphincter-preserving procedure for rectal cancer Ann Surg Oncol 12 117 123 10.1245/ASO.2005.12.036 15827791 (Pubitemid 40486619)
13. E. Arriola M. Navarro D. Parès, et al. 2006 Imaging techniques contribute to increased surgical rescue of relapse in the follow-up of colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 49 478 484 10.1007/s10350-005-0280-9 16450212
14. F. Abir S. Alva W.E. Longo, et al. 2006 The postoperative surveillance of patients with colon cancer and rectal cancer Am J Surg 192 100 108 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.053 16769285 (Pubitemid 43849615)
15. K.S. Virgo A.M. Vernava W.E. Longo, et al. 1995 Cost of patient follow-up after potentially curative colorectalcancer treatment JAMA 273 1837 1841 10.1001/jama.273.23.1837 7776499 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3psFWntA%3D%3D
16. A.G. Renehan S.T. O'Dwyer D.K. Whynes 2004 Cost effectiveness analysis of intensive versus conventional follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer BMJ 328 81 10.1136/bmj.328.7431.81 14715603
17. B. Glimelius J. Oliveira 2008 Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 19 [Suppl2] ii31 ii32 10.1093/annonc/mdn078 18456759
18. C.E. Desch A.B. Benson III M.R. Somerfield, et al. 2005 Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology Practice Guideline J Clin Oncol 23 8512 8519 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.0063 16260687
19. J.D. Soyka P. Veit-Haibach K. Strobel, et al. 2008 Staging pathways in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: is contrastenhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT the diagnostic tool of choice? J Nucl Med 49 354 361 10.2967/jnumed.107.048249 18287263 (Pubitemid 351355199)
20. K.C. Potter J.E. Husband S.L. Houghton, et al. 2009 Diagnostic accuracy of serial CT/magnetic resonance imaging review vs. positron emission tomography/CT in colorectal cancer patients with suspected and known recurrence Dis Colon Rectum 52 253 259 19279420