Remote sensing alone is insufficient for quantifying changes in forest cover

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 38, 2010, Pages

  Reams, Gregory A ^a   Brewer, Charles K ^a   Guldin, Richard W ^a  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOREST; FOREST DYNAMICS; LAND USE; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMOTE SENSING; UNITED NATIONS; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORESTRY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREE; UNITED STATES;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FORESTRY; INTERNATIONALITY; TREES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78049253504     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1008665107     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV (2010) Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8650-8655.
2. Rice D (2010) Fading forests: U.S. losing trees faster than other heavily forested nations. USA Today, April 27, 2010.
3. Smith WB, Miles PD, Perry CH, Pugh SA (2009) Forest Resources of the United States (USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC).
4. Eidenshink J, et al. (2007) A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecol 3:3-21.
5. Quayle B, Brewer K, Williams K (2005) Monitoring post-fire vegetation recovery of wildland fire areas in the western United States using MODIS data. Proceedings of PECORA 16 - Global Priorities in Land Remote Sensing. (American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Sioux Falls, SD).