Modelling water blending-sensitivity of optimal policies

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 749-757

  Webby, R B ^a   Green, D A ^a   Metcalfe, A V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Conditional value at risk; Linear programming; Stochastic dynamic programming; Water resource allocation

Indexed keywords

BLENDING; ECONOMICS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; VALUE ENGINEERING; WATER RESOURCES;

CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK; DISCRETISATION; EXPECTED MONETARY VALUES; LINEAR FORMULATION; LINEAR PROGRAMS; OPTIMAL POLICIES; STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAM; STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING;

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING;

LINEAR PROGRAMING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 78049240659     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-008-9166-2     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Archibald, T. W., McKinnon, K. I. M., & Thomas, L. C. (2006). Naval Research Logistics, 53, 217-225.
2. Cabero, J., Baíllo, Á., Cerisola, S., Ventosa, M., García-Alcalde, A., Perán, F., et al. (2005). IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20, 1379-1388.
3. FAO (1991). www.fao.org/docrep/U3160E/u3160e05/url/. Accessed 30 Jul 2007.
4. Howard, R. A. (1960). Dynamic programming and Markov processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Kuczera, G. (2008). Urban water supply drought security: A comparative analysis of complimentary centralised and decentralised storage systems. In Proceedings of 31st hydrology and water resources symposium. Adelaide.
6. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1443-1471.