New approach to determine common weights in DEA efficiency evaluation model

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 609-615

  Yang, Feng ^a   Yang, Chenchen ^a   Liang, Liang ^a   Du, Shaofu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Common weight; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Multi objective programming; Ranking

Indexed keywords

COMMON WEIGHTS; DATA ENVELOPMENT; DECISION-MAKING UNITS; EFFICIENCY EVALUATION; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; NEW APPROACHES; RANKING; RANKING APPROACH; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY; SELF EVALUATION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DATA HANDLING; DECISION MAKING; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 77958614855     PISSN: 10044132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2010.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operation Research, 1978, 2: 429-444.
2. R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1984, 30: 1078-1092.
3. R. G. Dyson, R. Allen, A. S. Camanho, et al. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 132(2): 245-259.
4. J. Doyle, R. Green. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and the uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45: 567-578.
5. T. Sueyoshi. Data envelopment analysis non-parametric ranking test and index measurement: Slack-adjusted DEA and an application to Japanese agriculture cooperatives. Omega, 1999, 27: 315-326.
6. A. M. Torgersen, F. R. Forsund, S. A. C. Kittelsen. Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1996, 7: 379-398.
7. Z. Sinuany-Stern, A. Mehrez, A. Barboy. Academic departments efficiency via data envelopment analysis. Computers and Operations Research, 1994, 21(5): 543-556.
8. Z. Sinuany-Stern, L. Friedman. Data envelopment analysis and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units. European Journal ofOperational Research, 1998, 111: 470-478.
9. I. Bardhan, W. F. Bowlin, W. W. Cooper, et al. Models for efficiency dominance in data envelopment analysis. Part I: Additive models and MED measures. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 1996, 39: 322-332.
10. W. D. Cook, M. Kress, L. M. Seiford. On the use of ordinal data in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1993, 44: 133-140.
11. W. D. Cook, M. Kress, L. M. Seiford. Data envelopment analysis in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative factors. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1996, 47: 945-953.
12. T. R. Sexton, R. H. Silkman, A. J. Hogan. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. Measuring Efficiency: an Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1986: 73-105.