|
Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages 53-
|
Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONVALESCENCE;
DEFIBRILLATOR;
DISEASE MODEL;
HEART VENTRICLE FIBRILLATION;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE;
METHODOLOGY;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
RESUSCITATION;
RIB FRACTURE;
SWINE;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
ANIMALS;
BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION;
CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION;
DEFIBRILLATORS;
DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL;
HUMANS;
MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIPULATIONS;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;
RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;
RIB FRACTURES;
SWINE;
VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 77958612587
PISSN: None
EISSN: 14712261
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-10-53 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (49)
|
References (0)
|