Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered transdermally and intravenously in sheep

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 71, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1127-1132

  Ahern, Benjamin J ^a   Soma, Lawrence R ^b   Rudy, Jeffrey A ^b,c   Uboh, Cornelius E ^b,c   Schaer, Thomas P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG CLEARANCE; DRUG DETERMINATION; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG ELIMINATION; DRUG HALF LIFE; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PLASMA CONCENTRATION-TIME CURVE; SHEEP; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TRANSDERMAL PATCH;

ADMINISTRATION, CUTANEOUS; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANIMALS; AREA UNDER CURVE; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HALF-LIFE; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; SHEEP; TRANSDERMAL PATCH;

ANIMALIA; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 77958598978     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.71.10.1127     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Carroll GL, Hooper RN, Boothe DM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after intravenous and transdermal administration in goats. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:986-991. (Pubitemid 29357719)
2. Egger CM, Glerum LE, Allen SW, et al. Plasma fentanyl concentrations in awake cats and cats undergoing anesthesia and ovariohysterectomy using transdermal administration. Vet Anaesth Analg 2003;30:229-236.
3. Orsini JA, Moate PJ, Kuersten K, et al. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl delivered transdermally in healthy adult horses - variability among horses and its clinical implications. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2006;29:539-546. (Pubitemid 44684097)
4. Posner LP, Gleed RD, Erb HN, et al. Post-anesthetic hyperthermia in cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2007;34:40-47.
5. Romans CW, Gordon WJ, Robinson DA, et al. Effect of postoperative analgesic protocol on limb function following onychectomy in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:89-93.
6. Thomasy SM, Slovis N, Maxwell LK, et al. Transdermal fentanyl combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:550-554. (Pubitemid 39107548)
7. Maxwell LK, Thomasy SM, Slovis N, et al. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl following intravenous and transdermal administration in horses. Equine Vet J 2003;35:484-490. (Pubitemid 38698711)
8. Shafford HL, Hellyer PW, Turner AS. Intra-articular lidocaine plus bupivacaine in sheep undergoing stifle arthrotomy. Vet Anaesth Analg 2004;31:20-26.
9. Ahern BJ, Soma LR, Boston RC, et al. Comparison of the analgesic properties of transdermally administered fentanyl and intramuscularly administered buprenorphine during and following orthopedic surgery in sheep. Am J Vet Res 2009;70:418-422.
10. Huynh NH, Tyrefors N, Ekman L, et al. Determination of fentanyl in human plasma and fentanyl and norfentanyl in human urine using LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2005;37:1095-1100. (Pubitemid 40614840)
11. Palleschi L, Lucentini L, Ferretti E, et al. Quantitative determination of sufentanil in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2003;32:329-336. (Pubitemid 36588734)
12. Solassol I, Bressolle F, Caumette L, et al. Inter- and intraindividual variabilities in pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after repeated 72-hour transdermal applications in cancer pain patients. Ther Drug Monit 2005;27:491-498.
13. Thomasy SM, Mama KR, Whitley K, et al. Influence of general anaesthesia on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous fentanyl and its primary metabolite in horses. Equine Vet J 2007;39:54-58.
14. Fryirsa B, Woodhouse A, Huang JL, et al. Determination of subnanogram concentrations of fentanyl in plasma by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: comparison with standard radioimmunoassay (Erratum published in Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1997;695:448). J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1997;688:79-85.
15. International Organization for Standardization. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025. Geneva: Committee on Conformity Assessment, ISO/CASC, 1999.
16. Boston RC, Greif PC, Bermn M. Conversational SAAM - an interactive program for kinetic analysis of biological systems. Comput Programs Biomed 1981;13:111-119.
17. Stefanovski D, Moate PJ, Boston RC. WinSAAM: a windows-based compartmental modeling system. Metabolism 2003;52:1153-1166.
18. Berman M, Schoenfeld R. Invariants in experimental data on linear kinetics and the formulation of models. J Appl Physiol 1965;27:1361-1370.
19. Wastney ME, Patterson BH, Linares OA, et al. Investigating biological systems using modeling: strategies and software. New York: Academic Press Inc, 1999;129.
20. Gabrielsson J, Weiner D. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis: concepts & applications. Stockholm: Swedish Pharmaceutical Press, 2000;81-82.
21. Baggot JD. Principles of drug disposition in domestic animals: basis of veterinary clinical pharmacology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1977;170-171.
22. Grubb TL, Gold JR, Schlipf JW, et al. Assessment of serum concentrations and sedative effects of fentanyl after transdermal administration at three dosages in healthy llamas. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:907-909.
23. Kyles A. Transdermal fentanyl. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1998;721-726.
24. Varvel JR, Shafer SL, Hwang SS, et al. Absorption characteristics of transdermally administered fentanyl. Anesthesiology 1989;70:928-934.
25. Wilkinson AC, Thomas ML III, Morse BC. Evaluation of a transdermal fentanyl system in yucatan miniature pigs. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 2001;40:12-16.
26. Gellasch KL, Kruse-Elliott KT, Osmond CS, et al. Comparison of transdermal administration of fentanyl versus intramuscular administration of butorphanol for analgesia after onychectomy in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:1020-1024.
27. Gilbert DB, Motzel SL, Das SR. Postoperative pain management using fentanyl patches in dogs. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 2003;42:21-26.
28. Van Nimmen NF, Veulemans HA. Development and validation of a highly sensitive gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric screening method for the simultaneous determination of nanogram levels of fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil in air and surface contamination wipes. J Chromatogr A 2004;1035:249-259.
29. Van Nimmen NF, Poels KL, Veulemans HA. Highly sensitive gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric screening method for the determination of picogram levels of fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil and their major metabolites in urine of opioid exposed workers. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2004;804:375-387.
30. Van Nimmen NF, Veulemans HA. Validated GC-MS analysis for the determination of residual fentanyl in applied Durogesic reservoir and Durogesic D-Trans matrix transdermal fentanyl patches. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007;846:264-272.
31. Marier JF, Lor M, Morin J, et al. Comparative bioequivalence study between a novel matrix transdermal delivery system of fentanyl and a commercially available reservoir formulation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:121-124.
32. Marquardt KA, Tharratt RS, Musallam NA. Fentanyl remaining in a transdermal system following three days of continuous use. Ann Pharmacother 1995;29:969-971.