The Economic Consequences of IFRS: The Impact of IAS 32 on Preference Shares in the Netherlands

Accounting in Europe

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 169-185

  de Jong, Abe ^a   Rosellón, Miguel ^a   Verwijmeren, Patrick ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958597183     PISSN: 17449480     EISSN: 17449499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638180600920350     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ali, A. and Kumar, K. R. 1994. The magnitudes of financial statement effects and accounting choice: the case of the adoption of SFAS 87. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18: 89-114.
2. Becht, M. and Boehmer, E. 1999. Transparency of ownership and control in Germany. Working Paper
3. Carter, M. E. and Lynch, L. J. 2003. The consequences of the FASB's 1998 proposal on accounting for stock option repricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35: 51-72.
4. Choi, F. D. S. and Levich, R. M. 1991. The Capital Market Effects of International Accounting Diversity, New York: Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions.
5. Collins, D. W. 1981. The economic determinants of the market reaction to proposed mandatory accounting changes in the oil and gas industry: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3: 37-71.
6. Conac, P. 2005. The new French preferred shares: moving towards a more liberal approach. European Company and Financial Law Review, 2(4): 487-511.
7. Duke, J. and Hunt, H. 1990. An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12: 45-63.
8. Guidry, F. 1999. Earnings-based bonus plans and earnings management by business-unit managers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26: 113-142.
9. Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7: 85-107.
10. Imhoff, E. A. and Thomas, J. K. 1988. Economic consequences of accounting standards: the lease disclosure rule change. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10: 277-310.
11. Laurent, S. 2002. Securities that do the deal: the decision to issue preference shares by UK firms. Working Paper
12. Mittelstaedt, H. F. 1995. SFAS No. 106 and benefit reductions in employer-sponsored retiree health plans. The Accounting Review, 70(4): 535-556.
13. Myers, S. C. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39: 575-592.
14. Press, E. and Weintrop, J. 1990. Accounting-based constraints in public and private debt agreements: their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12: 65-95.
15. Sweeney, A. P. 1994. Debt-covenant violations and managers' accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17: 281-308.
16. Tang, Q. 1994. Economic consequences of the international harmonization of accounting standards: theory and its Chinese application. The International Journal of Accounting, 29(2): 146-160.
17. Watts, R. L. and Zimmerman, J. L. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1): 112-134.
18. Watts, R. L. and Zimmerman, J. L. 1990. Positive accounting theory: a ten year perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1): 131-156.
19. Zeff, S. A. 1978. The rise of economic consequences. The Journal of Accountancy, December: 56-63.
20. Zimmerman, J. L. 1983. Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5: 119-149.
21. Zmijewski, M. and Hagerman, R. 1981. An income strategy approach to the positive theory of accounting standard setting/choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3: 129-149.